Prompt Library

40 ChatGPT Prompts to Rewrite Your LinkedIn

40 copy-paste prompts

About sections, headlines by role, work experience that reads as proof, and featured-section copy. Built for mid-senior employed professionals who want to be found — not job seekers shouting for attention.

In short: This page contains 40 copy-paste ready prompts, organized into 8 categories with a description and pro tip for each. The first 15 prompts are free instantly — no signup needed. Hand-curated and tested by the AI Academy team.

By Louis Corneloup · Founder, Techpresso
Last updated ·Hand-curated & tested by the AI Academy team

About Section Master Rewrite

1 prompt

Senior About Section: The 3-Beat Rewrite

1/40

Rewrite my LinkedIn About section in the voice of a senior, employed professional — not a job seeker. My current role: [role + company]. My background in 6 bullets: [paste 6 brief bullets — roles, scope, the kind of problems you solve]. Structure the About section in 3 beats: (1) The 1-sentence opener that names WHAT I do and WHO benefits (no "passionate about" or "results-driven" — those are job-seeker tells), (2) A 3-4 sentence middle that names the 2-3 specific kinds of problems I have solved, with the SCALE attached (team size, business stage, dollar impact), (3) A 2-sentence close that signals what I am currently working on or curious about, and how to reach me. Total: 6-8 sentences max. Tone: confident, specific, never desperate. Senior About sections sound like they belong to someone who has options.

Rewrites your About section as a senior-employed voice — not the desperate "open to opportunities" job-seeker register.

💡

Pro tip: Strip out every word a job seeker would use: "passionate", "driven", "results-oriented", "team player", "open to opportunities". Senior About sections describe what you DO, not what you ARE.

Prompts get you started. Tutorials level you up.

A growing library of 300+ hands-on AI tutorials. New tutorials added every week.

Start 7-Day Free Trial

Headline Variants by Role

6 prompts

Senior Product Manager: 6 Headline Variants

2/40

I am a Senior / Group / Principal Product Manager at [company]. My focus area is [B2B SaaS / consumer / fintech / infra / etc.]. My 1-2 strongest signals are [e.g., shipped X feature that drove $YM ARR, led 0-to-1 launch in regulated industry, ran growth at [recognizable company]]. Generate 6 distinct LinkedIn headline variants, each under 220 characters: (1) An outcomes-first headline that leads with what I have shipped, (2) A specialist headline that owns a specific niche (e.g., "Product Manager building B2B retention loops"), (3) A scope-first headline that signals scale ("PM leading [N] eng teams at [stage] B2B SaaS"), (4) A point-of-view headline that signals what I believe ("Product Manager — bias toward small, opinionated software"), (5) An ex-credential headline if I have a strong prior brand ("PM at [current] — formerly [Stripe/Figma/etc.]"), (6) A community / external-signal headline that hints at writing, speaking, or open source. Rank them by which is best for inbound from VCs / recruiters / founders.

Six PM headlines in different styles — outcomes, specialist, scope, point-of-view, ex-credential, community.

💡

Pro tip: For senior roles, the headline that names your specific niche tends to outperform the generic "Senior PM" — niches attract the right inbound and repel the wrong.

Senior Engineer / Staff+: 6 Headline Variants

3/40

I am a Senior / Staff / Principal Engineer at [company]. Focus area: [distributed systems / ML infra / frontend platform / etc.]. Strongest signals: [e.g., owned the migration of X, wrote the framework Y uses, scaled service to Z QPS, prior at [recognizable company]]. Generate 6 LinkedIn headline variants under 220 characters: (1) Scope-first ("Staff Engineer building [specific system] at [company]"), (2) Specialist depth ("Distributed systems — building the [thing] layer at [company]"), (3) Outcome-first ("Cut [system] latency 4x and rebuilt the [layer] — Staff Eng @ [company]"), (4) Point-of-view ("Staff Engineer. Bias toward boring tech and small interfaces."), (5) Ex-credential ("Staff Eng @ [current] — previously [FAANG / Stripe / etc.]"), (6) Community-signal ("Staff Eng — author of [OSS] | writes about [topic] at [blog]"). Rank by which is best for inbound from staff+ recruiters and tech founders.

Six staff+ engineer headlines spanning scope, depth, outcome, point-of-view, credential, and community.

💡

Pro tip: The "boring tech, small interfaces" style point-of-view headline is the strongest signal for staff+ — it repels juniors and attracts the right peer signal.

Founder / Operator: 6 Headline Variants

4/40

I am a founder / operator running [company] in [space]. My company is [stage — e.g., bootstrapped, Series A, $XM ARR]. My strongest external signals: [e.g., prior exit, well-known angel investors, recognizable customer logos, podcast appearances]. Generate 6 LinkedIn headline variants under 220 characters: (1) Direct ("Founder, [company] — [what we do in 8 words]"), (2) Outcome-anchored ("Building [company] — $XM ARR / [N] customers"), (3) Customer-anchored ("Building [company] — used by [recognizable customer types]"), (4) Mission-anchored ("Building [company] — making [X] easier for [Y]"), (5) Stage-honest ("Building [company] — early, profitable, hiring"), (6) Community / writing-anchored ("Founder @ [company] | writes about [topic]"). Rank by which is best for inbound from prospective hires, investors, and customers.

Six founder/operator headline variants that signal stage, traction, and personality.

💡

Pro tip: Bootstrapped founders should signal it directly. VC-backed founders should signal customer logos. Both audiences read founder headlines for stage signals first.

Senior Designer: 6 Headline Variants

5/40

I am a Senior / Staff / Principal Designer at [company]. My specialty is [product design / brand design / motion / design systems / 0-to-1]. Strongest signals: [e.g., shipped X product, led design system for Y, won [award], prior at [recognizable company]]. Generate 6 LinkedIn headline variants under 220 characters: (1) Specialist ("Product Designer at [company] — focused on [specific surface like onboarding, design systems, AI interfaces]"), (2) Scope-first ("Senior Designer leading [N] product surfaces at [company]"), (3) Outcome-first ("Designed [recognizable product/feature] at [company]"), (4) Point-of-view ("Designer — bias toward shipping over polishing"), (5) Ex-credential ("Designer @ [current] — formerly [Apple/Figma/Linear/etc.]"), (6) Community ("Designer | speaker | writes about [topic] at [blog]"). Rank by which is best for inbound from senior design recruiters and founders.

Six senior designer headlines from specialist to outcome to point-of-view.

💡

Pro tip: The strongest senior designer headlines name a specific surface ("onboarding", "design systems", "AI interfaces") — generic "Product Designer" reads as mid-level.

Senior Marketing / Growth: 6 Headline Variants

6/40

I am a Senior / Director / VP of Marketing or Growth at [company]. My focus: [content / paid / lifecycle / brand / community / PLG growth]. Strongest signals: [e.g., scaled [channel] to $XM ARR, led marketing at [recognizable brand], built the playbook for [motion]]. Generate 6 LinkedIn headline variants under 220 characters: (1) Channel-specialist ("Head of Lifecycle at [company] — built the email engine driving $XM"), (2) Stage-specialist ("Marketing leader — built 0-to-$10M motion at [company]"), (3) Outcome-first ("Built [recognizable campaign / motion] at [company]"), (4) Point-of-view ("Marketing leader — bias toward owned channels over paid"), (5) Ex-credential ("Head of Growth @ [current] — formerly [Hubspot/Stripe/etc.]"), (6) Community ("Marketing leader | writes [newsletter] | speaks at [conferences]"). Rank by inbound quality for senior marketing recruiters.

Six senior marketing/growth headlines spanning channel, stage, outcome, POV, credential, and community.

💡

Pro tip: Stage-specialist headlines ("built 0-to-$10M motion at [company]") attract the most inbound at founder + Series A/B companies, which is where senior marketing leaders are most in demand.

Senior Sales / Revenue: 6 Headline Variants

7/40

I am a Senior / Strategic / Enterprise AE or Director of Sales at [company]. My segment: [SMB / mid-market / enterprise / strategic]. Strongest signals: [e.g., consistently top-quartile, closed $XM in [year], expert in [specific motion like land-and-expand], built the [team / playbook]]. Generate 6 LinkedIn headline variants under 220 characters: (1) Outcome-anchored ("Closed $XM in [year] — Enterprise AE at [company]"), (2) Segment-specialist ("Strategic AE selling to [vertical] at [company]"), (3) Scope-first ("Director of Sales leading [N] AEs at [company]"), (4) Point-of-view ("Sales leader — bias toward MEDDIC + small reps with deep expertise"), (5) Ex-credential ("AE @ [current] — formerly [Salesforce/Stripe/etc.]"), (6) Community ("Sales leader | writes about enterprise selling | mentors AEs"). Rank by which best attracts inbound from senior sales recruiters.

Six senior sales headlines from outcome-anchored to segment-specialist to community.

💡

Pro tip: Senior sales recruiters look for outcome numbers FIRST. Headlines that lead with "$XM closed in [year]" outperform every other variant for inbound.

Work Experience Bullet Rewrites

10 prompts

Turn Responsibilities Into Proof

8/40

Rewrite my LinkedIn work experience bullets to read as PROOF, not duties. My role: [title + company]. My current bullets: [paste your bullets]. For each bullet, transform it using this structure: [What I shipped / drove / changed] + [the scale or scope — team size, dollars, users] + [the measurable outcome — % change, $ change, time saved] + [the second-order effect — what it enabled, what shifted in the org]. Where I don't have a number, suggest a realistic placeholder I can verify, marked with [VERIFY]. End each bullet with proof, not adjective. The goal: a recruiter or peer reading this in 8 seconds should understand the SCALE and IMPACT of what I did.

Transforms responsibility-shaped bullets into proof-shaped bullets — the senior signal on LinkedIn.

💡

Pro tip: Always anchor on the second-order effect. "Shipped X" is a duty. "Shipped X, which enabled the team to deprecate the legacy system" is proof.

Bullets That Pass the 8-Second Scan

9/40

Rewrite my LinkedIn work experience bullets so they pass the 8-second scan test. My role: [title + company]. My bullets: [paste]. Rules: (1) The first 5 words must contain the strongest signal in the bullet — verb + scale + impact, (2) Every bullet must contain at least 1 number (team size, dollars, % shift, headcount, users — anything quantifiable), (3) Cut every adjective ("strategic", "innovative", "results-driven") — they add no signal, (4) No bullet over 25 words. If it does not fit, the bullet is doing 2 things and needs to be split, (5) Order bullets within a role by impact, descending — strongest bullet first. Show me the before / after side by side so I can see what changed.

A scan-test optimization that front-loads signal — most LinkedIn profiles get read in 8 seconds or not at all.

💡

Pro tip: Cut every adjective in the first 5 words. Adjectives are signals of weakness; specific verbs + nouns are signals of strength.

Bullet Rewrite: From "Led" to Specific Verbs

10/40

My LinkedIn bullets are over-indexed on "led" and "managed" — they hide the actual work I did. Here are my current bullets: [paste]. Rewrite each one to replace "led" or "managed" with a more specific verb that names what I actually did: shipped, scoped, prioritized, killed, negotiated, recruited, deprecated, restructured, expanded, contracted, hired, fired, mentored, escalated, surfaced, defended. Each bullet should signal a specific category of action and the OUTCOME of that action. Show me before / after with the swap highlighted. If the original bullet does not have a clear action verb behind "led", flag it as too vague to keep.

Replaces lazy verbs ("led", "managed") with specific ones that signal what you actually did.

💡

Pro tip: "Led" and "managed" are tells of senior candidates who have not refined their narrative. Specific verbs ("deprecated", "negotiated", "killed") signal calibration and ownership.

Bullet Rewrite: Quantify Soft Outcomes

11/40

I have LinkedIn bullets where the impact is real but the metric is soft (e.g., "improved team morale", "increased collaboration", "improved customer satisfaction"). Here are my current bullets: [paste]. For each, rewrite to attach a quantifiable proxy: morale → eNPS shift, retention rate, voluntary attrition; collaboration → cycle time, # cross-team launches, # escalations; customer satisfaction → NPS shift, churn rate, CSAT delta, support volume. Where I don't have a real number, suggest a credible proxy and mark it [VERIFY] so I can check before posting. The goal: every "soft" outcome becomes a defensible metric.

Converts soft outcomes (morale, collaboration, satisfaction) into defensible quantifiable proxies.

💡

Pro tip: eNPS, voluntary attrition, and cycle time are the most defensible proxies for "soft" management wins. Use them instead of vague descriptors.

Bullet Rewrite for a Senior Manager → Director Shift

12/40

I am repositioning my LinkedIn for a Senior Manager → Director-level move. My current bullets read as a hands-on manager; I need them to signal strategic scope. Current bullets: [paste]. Rewrite each one to: (1) Add the org-wide context (how many teams, how many ICs, what fraction of the broader org), (2) Surface the planning or strategic call I made (not just the execution), (3) Reframe team outcomes as business outcomes — translate engineering or product metrics into revenue, retention, or strategic position language, (4) Cut any bullet that is genuinely IC-level work and is now beneath the level I am targeting. Mark cuts with [REMOVE - too IC]. Goal: every bullet must signal director-level scope and judgment.

Repositions a senior manager profile for director-level reads by reframing execution as strategy.

💡

Pro tip: When repositioning upward, the cuts matter as much as the rewrites. Bullets that signal hands-on IC work HURT a director-level positioning — even if they are recent and real.

Bullet Rewrite for Cross-Industry Move

13/40

I am moving from [current industry] to [target industry] on LinkedIn. My bullets currently use industry-specific jargon and metrics. Here are my bullets: [paste]. For each, rewrite to (1) Strip out [current industry] jargon and replace with universal business language (or [target industry] equivalents where they exist), (2) Translate metrics into ones that travel — convert internal KPIs to standard finance/operations metrics (revenue, margin, retention, headcount, capital efficiency), (3) Preserve the SCALE but generalize the CONTEXT — keep "$XM" but make "$XM in [generic outcome]" rather than "$XM in [vertical-specific outcome]", (4) Add 1 bullet per role that signals transferability — what KIND of problem I solved, not what KIND of company I solved it for.

Translates industry-jargon bullets into universal business language for cross-industry moves.

💡

Pro tip: Translate metrics, preserve scale. The same accomplishment lands differently when the dollar amount is preserved but the vertical context is generalized.

Cut a Bullet List in Half

14/40

My LinkedIn role has 7-8 bullets and reads as bloated. Here are the current bullets: [paste]. Help me cut to 4 bullets that signal the most: (1) Rank all current bullets by signal strength (scale + outcome + uniqueness), (2) Identify which 2 bullets are essentially the same accomplishment from different angles, and merge them into 1, (3) Cut any bullet that is hygiene work (regular duties, expected at this level) — those are not differentiating, (4) Keep at most 4 bullets total, in descending order of impact. Show me the cuts with a 1-line reason for each removal. Goal: a recruiter reading 4 strong bullets remembers more than reading 8 mediocre ones.

Pruning exercise — most LinkedIn profiles are too long, not too short.

💡

Pro tip: Recruiters remember 4 strong bullets and forget 8 weak ones. The cut is more valuable than the addition.

Add Second-Order Impact to Every Bullet

15/40

My LinkedIn bullets describe what I did but not what it enabled downstream. Bullets: [paste]. For each, add the second-order effect — what shipped because of this work, what got faster, what got deprecated, what got acquired, what got hired into, what got de-risked. Format: [Primary action + outcome] — which enabled [second-order effect with its own scale]. Where I don't know the second-order effect, suggest 2-3 plausible candidates I can verify. Goal: every bullet signals that I think about leverage, not just execution.

Adds second-order effects to bullets — the senior signal that you think in leverage, not just deliverables.

💡

Pro tip: Second-order effects (what your work enabled) often have BIGGER numbers than your direct outcome. Surfacing them is the senior signal.

Rewrite a Bullet About a Failed Project

16/40

I have a project on my LinkedIn that ended in failure or pivot but the work I did was meaningful. Project: [briefly describe — what we tried, what we learned, why it ended]. My current bullet: [paste]. Help me rewrite it so the bullet signals (1) The work I shipped that has standalone value (the infra, the research, the customer learning), (2) The decision I made or argued for that turned out to be right even though the project failed, (3) What the company adopted afterward as a result of what I built — show the lasting impact. Frame as a learning artifact, not a wound. Keep under 25 words. Senior profiles benefit from honest failure framing; junior ones avoid it.

Reframes a failed project bullet to signal learning, judgment, and lasting impact.

💡

Pro tip: Acknowledging a failed project on LinkedIn (well) is a senior trust signal. Most candidates hide them; senior candidates surface the lessons.

Bullet Rewrite Across 3 Tones

17/40

I want to test which tone works best for my LinkedIn audience. Here is 1 bullet I want to optimize: [paste your bullet, including current context]. Rewrite it in 3 distinct tones: (1) Numbers-forward — lead with the metric, no adjectives, sounds like a quarterly review, (2) Story-forward — lead with the problem context, sound like a peer telling a war story, (3) Point-of-view forward — lead with the principle or belief that drove the work, sound like an essay sentence. For each, give the bullet plus a 1-sentence note on what audience the tone is best for (recruiters / peers / founders / customers). Goal: pick the tone that matches my next career move.

A/B tonal test for a single bullet — pick the tone that matches your next audience.

💡

Pro tip: Different audiences read LinkedIn differently. Founders respond to point-of-view tone; recruiters respond to numbers-forward; peers respond to story-forward. Match tone to your next move.

Like these prompts? There are full tutorials behind them.

Learn the workflows, not just the prompts. 300+ easy-to-follow tutorials inside AI Academy — and growing every week.

Try AI Academy Free

Project Experience Reformatters

6 prompts

Reformat a Project as a Proof Artifact

18/40

I have a notable project I want to highlight on LinkedIn — currently it lives in the "Projects" or "Featured" section. Project: [briefly describe — what, when, with whom]. Current write-up: [paste]. Reformat it as a proof artifact with this structure: (1) 1-sentence opener naming WHAT it is and WHO it was for (no "passionate about" tells), (2) 2-3 sentences of context — the problem, the stakes, the constraint, (3) The 1-2 specific decisions I made that are differentiating, (4) The OUTCOME with a number — even if approximate, even if I have to mark [VERIFY], (5) The link or artifact (if available) — repo, case study, demo, talk. Under 100 words. The goal: a peer scanning the section in 15 seconds understands what makes this project worth reading more about.

Reformats a project bullet into a proof artifact: opener, context, decision, outcome, link.

💡

Pro tip: The "decision I made that is differentiating" sentence is the senior signal. Without it, projects read as generic case studies; with it, they read as your unique judgment.

Project Section: Open-Source Contribution

19/40

I have an open-source contribution I want to surface on LinkedIn. The project: [name + brief description]. My contribution: [briefly describe — what I built / fixed / proposed]. Help me write a 100-word entry that signals seniority: (1) The 1-sentence what + why — what I contributed and what problem it solved, (2) 2-3 sentences of technical context — why this approach over the obvious alternatives, what trade-off I made, (3) The signal — # of contributors, # of users / downloads / stars, % the project has grown, anything that signals scale, (4) The link — repo, PR, or related blog post. Tone: confident, specific, no humblebrag. Senior contributors describe what they built; juniors describe what was hard about it.

A LinkedIn entry for an open-source contribution that signals technical seniority without humblebragging.

💡

Pro tip: Senior OSS write-ups describe the DECISION you made (and what alternative you rejected). Junior write-ups describe the EFFORT you put in.

Project Section: Side Project With Business Outcome

20/40

I have a side project (built outside my day job) with real traction. Project: [name + 1 sentence]. Traction: [what — users, MRR, downloads, customers, recognition]. Help me write a 100-word LinkedIn entry: (1) 1-sentence what — what it does and who it serves, (2) Why I built it — the specific itch or gap I noticed, (3) The traction with numbers — exact numbers, not adjectives, (4) The current state — actively maintained? Sunset? Sold? Looking for co-builder? (5) The link to the product or write-up. Goal: signal that I ship outside the day job, that I think in customer outcomes, and that I have public taste. Side projects are a senior differentiator IF they show outcome — not effort.

A LinkedIn project entry for a side project with real traction — the senior differentiator.

💡

Pro tip: Side projects without numbers are noise on a senior LinkedIn. The signal is the traction, not the existence. If the traction is small, lead with the LEARNING instead.

Project Section: Speaking / Talks / Workshops

21/40

I have spoken at [conferences / podcasts / internal events] in the last 2 years. Talks: [list with title, venue, year, topic]. Help me write a LinkedIn Project / Featured section entry that consolidates them. Structure: (1) 1-sentence opener describing the throughline — what topic I am known for speaking on, (2) 2-3 specific talks with their venues and 1-sentence on what each was about, (3) Total reach if I can estimate it (attendance, views, downloads), (4) The link to the most recent talk or a curated playlist. Tone: confident, not promotional. Goal: signal that I have a thesis and that audiences respond to it. Speaking matters on senior LinkedIn for inbound and brand.

A consolidated speaking-engagements LinkedIn entry that signals you have a thesis with public traction.

💡

Pro tip: Always name the throughline. "Talks on [X]" reads as a person with a point of view; a random list reads as resume padding.

Project Section: Writing / Newsletter / Blog

22/40

I write a newsletter, blog, or column. Publication: [name + brief description]. Audience: [size + composition — e.g., 3K subscribers, mostly senior PMs at B2B SaaS]. Cadence: [weekly / biweekly / monthly]. Help me write a Featured-section entry: (1) 1-sentence what — what I write about and who reads it, (2) The 2-3 most recent pieces with 1-sentence on each, (3) The signal — subscriber count, growth, notable readers if I am comfortable naming them, (4) The link to subscribe. Tone: declarative, not pleading. Goal: signal that I have a body of public work and a defined audience. Writing is one of the highest-leverage senior LinkedIn signals.

A writing/newsletter Featured-section entry that signals you have a body of public work and an audience.

💡

Pro tip: Subscriber counts under 1K are still worth surfacing IF the audience is right (e.g., 800 senior PMs is signal-rich). Quality of audience > raw count for senior LinkedIn.

Project Section: A Hire You Made That Worked

23/40

I want to surface a notable hire I made — not as a brag, but as a signal of judgment. The hire: [role + who they were when I hired them + what they have done since]. Help me write a 60-word Project / Featured section entry that signals this: (1) 1 sentence on the role I hired for and the constraint (early-stage? Rare skillset? Tough market?), (2) 1 sentence on the candidate — who they were when I hired them, especially if I bet on signal others missed, (3) 1 sentence on what they have shipped since. Tone: about THEIR work, not mine. Goal: signal hiring judgment without making it about me. Senior hiring stories on LinkedIn pay forward to your reputation as a builder of teams.

A LinkedIn entry that surfaces hiring judgment by celebrating someone you hired — a senior reputation move.

💡

Pro tip: Make the entry about THEM, not you. Senior hiring stories signal your judgment via the success of others, not via your own self-promotion.

Recommendation Request Prompts

4 prompts

Recommendation Request to a Former Manager

24/40

I want to ask a former manager to write me a LinkedIn recommendation. Former manager: [name + the role they had when they managed me]. We worked together for [length]. The 1-2 things they would credibly speak to about my work: [list]. Write me a 150-word request message: (1) Genuine, warm opener with 1 specific memory from our time together (not generic flattery), (2) The ask — explicitly for a LinkedIn recommendation, with the WHY (career move? Visibility? Brand building?), (3) The scaffolding — offer 2-3 themes they could speak to and 1 specific story or outcome they could anchor on (this makes their job 10x easier), (4) The make-it-easy — offer to write a draft if helpful, give a soft timeline, signal no pressure if they cannot, (5) Genuine close. Goal: a recommendation that signals THEIR experience of working with me, not a generic blurb.

A recommendation request to a former manager that scaffolds their answer for them — the difference between getting one and not.

💡

Pro tip: Always offer to write a draft. Most managers are overwhelmed; offering a draft turns a 30-minute task into a 5-minute review. Reply rate triples.

Recommendation Request to a Peer or Cross-Functional Partner

25/40

I want to ask a peer / cross-functional partner to write me a LinkedIn recommendation. Partner: [name + their role + how we worked together]. We collaborated on [specific work or project]. The angle they could best speak to: [collaboration, judgment, technical depth, customer empathy, communication]. Write me a 150-word request: (1) Open by acknowledging our collaboration with 1 specific moment, (2) The ask, with the WHY (career move, brand, visibility), (3) Scaffold — name the SPECIFIC angle I am asking them to speak to (peer recommendations are most credible when they speak to a specific dimension, not generally), (4) Offer a draft, give a soft timeline, signal no pressure, (5) Genuine close. Peer recommendations are 2x more impactful than manager ones on LinkedIn — make the ask great.

A peer recommendation request that anchors on a specific dimension — far more credible than generic peer blurbs.

💡

Pro tip: Peer recommendations beat manager recommendations on LinkedIn — peers are seen as harder graders. The trick is asking them to speak to ONE dimension specifically.

Recommendation Request to a Customer or External Partner

26/40

I want to ask a customer / external partner / client to write me a LinkedIn recommendation. Partner: [name + their role + their company + how we worked together]. The outcome we drove together: [briefly describe]. Write me a 150-word request: (1) Open with genuine appreciation for the working relationship (1 specific moment), (2) The ask — explicitly for a LinkedIn recommendation, with the WHY (career move, brand), (3) Scaffold — name 1-2 specific things THEY experienced (the responsiveness, the strategic input, the way I handled the tough conversation), (4) Acknowledge that they are busy and offer a draft they can edit OR a 3-sentence outline they can build from, (5) Genuine close. Customer recommendations are gold on LinkedIn — they are the most credible signal because they have no incentive to flatter.

A customer-side recommendation request that turns a customer relationship into the most credible LinkedIn signal.

💡

Pro tip: Customer recommendations beat both manager and peer recommendations for senior LinkedIn — they signal that someone with no career incentive vouched for your work.

Recommendation Request With a Specific Angle

27/40

I want to ask [name + role] for a LinkedIn recommendation that signals one specific thing: [name the thing — e.g., strategic thinking, hiring judgment, technical depth, leadership in crisis, customer empathy]. Why I want this specific angle: [the next career step requires signaling this dimension]. Write me a 150-word request: (1) Genuine opener with a specific memory that anchors on the angle, (2) The ask, with the WHY (specific career goal, not generic), (3) Scaffold the angle explicitly — "if you had to describe ONE thing about my work that you saw firsthand, would you be willing to anchor on [the angle]?", (4) Offer a draft outline that hits the angle, (5) Genuine close, with offer to reciprocate. Targeted recommendations beat generic ones 5:1 on LinkedIn.

A targeted recommendation request that anchors on a single dimension matched to your next move.

💡

Pro tip: Senior career moves require signaling specific dimensions. Asking for a recommendation that signals the SPECIFIC thing your next role demands is far more valuable than a generic glowing blurb.

Go from copy-pasting to actually mastering AI.

AI Academy: 300+ hands-on tutorials on ChatGPT, Claude, Midjourney, and 50+ other tools. New tutorials added every week.

Start Your Free Trial

Connection Message Templates

4 prompts

Cold Outreach: Asking for a Conversation, Not a Job

33/40

I want to send a cold LinkedIn connection request to [name + role + company]. Reason I want to connect: [specific — saw their talk, read their writing, admire their work in [area], thinking about a career move in their space]. Write me a connection request under 300 characters (LinkedIn limit): (1) 1 sentence that signals I have done real research — reference something specific they have shipped, said, or written, (2) 1 sentence that names what I do or am known for — so they understand why I am reaching out from a position of peer, not student, (3) 1 sentence that names the SPECIFIC reason I want to connect — not "I would love to chat" but "I am thinking about [specific topic] and would value 15 minutes of your thinking." (4) Close with a soft signal of no-pressure. Goal: reply rate of 30%+, not 5%.

A cold LinkedIn outreach calibrated for senior peer-to-peer rate — specific research, specific ask, no needy framing.

💡

Pro tip: Senior cold outreach reply rates depend on whether the message signals YOU did the research. Generic "I love your work" messages get archived; specific references get replies.

Mutual Connection Introduction Request

34/40

I want to ask [name of mutual connection] to introduce me to [name + role + company]. Reason for the intro: [specific — exploring a role, asking for advice, looking for a customer, sourcing a hire]. Write me a 150-word request to the mutual connection: (1) Genuine opener with a specific reference to our last conversation or interaction, (2) The ask — explicitly framed as a double-opt-in intro (their preferred method), (3) The 3-sentence forwardable blurb the mutual can paste — what I do, why I want to talk to this specific person, what is in it for them (briefly), (4) An out — "no worries if it is not the right ask right now", (5) Genuine close. Goal: the mutual can forward without thinking, and the recipient can decide in 30 seconds.

A mutual-connection intro request with a forwardable blurb — the mechanic that turns 5% intro rates into 70%.

💡

Pro tip: Always give the mutual a forwardable blurb they can paste with one click. The reason most intros don't happen is the friction of writing the email — remove it.

Re-engagement Message to a Dormant Connection

35/40

I want to reach out to a former colleague / dormant connection on LinkedIn. Connection: [name + how we know each other + how long since we last talked]. Reason for re-engaging: [specific — career move, want their thinking on a problem, exploring a partnership, just genuine catch-up]. Write me a 200-character message: (1) Acknowledge the gap warmly, no fake "thinking of you out of the blue" — be honest about why now, (2) 1 specific reference to our last interaction or working relationship, (3) The specific ask or reason — not vague "let me know how you are" but "I am thinking about X and would value your read", (4) Soft signal of no pressure, (5) Genuine close. Goal: reply rate above 50% for dormant senior connections.

A re-engagement message to a dormant senior connection — honest about the gap, specific about the ask.

💡

Pro tip: Dormant connections respond to honesty about the gap. "Hope you have been well" is a tell of someone who has not thought about why they are reaching out — make it specific.

Outreach After Their Job Change

36/40

A connection I respect just changed jobs (per LinkedIn notification). New role: [role + new company]. My relationship to them: [former colleague / peer in industry / known each other socially / cold connection but I have followed their work]. Write me a 200-character congrats + open-door message: (1) Genuine, specific congrats — name what is exciting about the move (the company, the role, the timing), (2) 1 sentence that signals I have been paying attention to their trajectory, (3) An open door — "I would value catching up once you are settled — happy to share what I have been seeing in [adjacent space] if useful", (4) No ask. Goal: reactivate the relationship before they get inundated with sales pitches in their new role.

A job-change outreach that opens the door without an immediate ask — the senior reputation move.

💡

Pro tip: Job changes are the highest-leverage relationship reactivation moment. Reaching out within 48-72 hours of the announcement is a senior signal of attentiveness.

Commentary Prompt Templates

4 prompts

Thoughtful Reply Under a Senior Leader's Post

37/40

I want to write a thoughtful reply to a LinkedIn post by [name + role] about [topic]. My genuine reaction: [briefly note your honest take — agreement, disagreement, addition, counterexample]. Write me a 100-150 word comment that signals senior peer engagement, not fanboying: (1) Open with the specific point in their post I am responding to (quote it briefly), (2) My substantive take — agree, disagree, or add — with specific reasoning and 1 concrete example from my own experience, (3) The 1 question I would push back on or extend with, (4) A close that leaves room for them to respond. Tone: peer talking to peer. No "great post" openers, no compliments — earn engagement through substance. Goal: top-quartile reply in the thread.

A senior LinkedIn comment that signals peer engagement — not fanboy compliments.

💡

Pro tip: "Great post" comments are filtered out by senior LinkedIn users — they read as low-signal. Specific substantive replies (even respectful disagreement) get noticed by the original author.

Add Value to a Trend / News Discussion

38/40

I want to comment on a hot trend / news item in my space — [topic]. The dominant takes in the discussion right now: [the 2-3 most repeated angles]. My differentiated angle: [what is the under-discussed angle that I am uniquely positioned to add]. Write me a 100-200 word comment for a LinkedIn post or thread on this topic: (1) Acknowledge the dominant takes briefly (so I am not seen as missing the point), (2) Name what is being missed in the discussion — the second-order effect, the constraint nobody is naming, the historical analog, (3) The 1 specific data point or example from my work that anchors my angle, (4) Close with the question I would push the discussion toward. Goal: a comment that gets quoted or screenshot by others. Senior commentary builds inbound.

A differentiated-angle commentary template that adds the under-discussed angle to a hot topic.

💡

Pro tip: The senior commentary move is naming what the dominant takes are MISSING — not adding another generic agreement. Differentiated commentary is what builds inbound.

Polite Disagreement With a Peer Post

39/40

A peer / connection I respect posted something on LinkedIn I disagree with. Their post: [paraphrase]. My disagreement: [your honest take and reasoning]. Write me a 150-word comment that disagrees respectfully and substantively: (1) Open by acknowledging the post and what I AGREE with (do not skip this — it earns the right to disagree), (2) Name the specific point I push back on, (3) My reasoning, with 1 concrete example or data point, (4) Acknowledge what would make me change my mind, (5) Close with respect for the author. Tone: peer-to-peer, not adversarial. Goal: disagreement that strengthens the relationship instead of damaging it.

A polite disagreement template that earns the right to push back by acknowledging the post first.

💡

Pro tip: Always lead with what you agree with. Skipping that step is what makes LinkedIn disagreement feel adversarial — even if the substance is the same.

Quote-Tweet-Style Repost With Commentary

40/40

I want to share a LinkedIn post by [name] with my own commentary (quote-repost style). The original post: [paraphrase or quote]. Why it matters to me / why I want to repost: [reason — agreement, surprise, validation, want to amplify a contrarian take]. Write me a 100-200 word repost commentary: (1) The 1-sentence hook that names why I am amplifying this, (2) 2-3 sentences of substantive engagement — what about the original I agree with, push back on, or extend, (3) The 1 angle I am adding that is not in the original — my unique contribution, (4) The link or repost mechanic. Tone: confident addition, not blind amplification. Goal: a repost that adds my own POV and earns me readers from the original author's audience.

A repost-with-commentary template that adds your own POV instead of blindly amplifying.

💡

Pro tip: Blind reposts add nothing to your own signal. Adding 100 words of your own POV turns the repost into a piece of YOUR content — and earns audience from the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

These are explicitly for mid-senior, employed professionals — not active job seekers. The voice, structure, and framing are calibrated to signal that you have options, not that you are looking. Examples reference scenarios like Senior PMs, Directors of Engineering, founders, and ex-Stripe operators — not first-job candidates or college grads. If you are actively looking, our ChatGPT Resume Prompts collection is a better starting point.
Generic LinkedIn rewriters optimize for keyword density and ATS pass-through — fine for active job seekers, but the wrong target for senior professionals who are found, not searching. These prompts optimize for inbound: how a senior peer, recruiter, or founder reads your profile in 8 seconds and decides whether to reach out. The structure is built around proof, scale, and point of view — not duties and adjectives.
Section by section, in this order: (1) Headline — highest ROI, takes 30 minutes, (2) About — second highest, takes an hour with the right prompt, (3) Featured section — high ROI for inbound, takes 30 minutes to prune, (4) Work experience bullets — most time-consuming but highest signal once done. Skip the Skills section unless you are actively hiring or being hired — it is mostly hygiene at senior level.
Feed real specifics into the prompts — actual scope, actual numbers, actual decisions you made. Generic inputs produce generic outputs. After ChatGPT generates the rewrite, edit for your natural voice: cut anything that does not sound like something you would say out loud, add the small idiosyncrasies that are uniquely yours (a specific phrase you use, a turn of writing). The goal is AI-assisted, not AI-authored.
Headline and Featured section: quarterly, especially after any meaningful shift in what you are working on. About section: annually, or when your trajectory shifts. Work experience: as you add new accomplishments worth highlighting, not on a fixed schedule. Senior LinkedIn signals direction; out-of-date profiles signal you are coasting, which actively hurts inbound from recruiters and founders.

Prompts are the starting line. Tutorials are the finish.

A growing library of 300+ hands-on tutorials on ChatGPT, Claude, Midjourney, and 50+ AI tools. New tutorials added every week.

7-day free trial. Cancel anytime.