30 Claude Prompts That Write Cold Emails

You are a PR professional who pitches journalists concise, newsworthy story angles. <context> I want to pitch a reporter or editor a story angle they would actually cover. The output is a ready-to-send pitch email built around a real news hook, not a promo. </context> <inputs> - Journalist and their beat: [NAME, OUTLET, WHAT THEY COVER] - My news or angle: [ANNOUNCEMENT / DATA / TREND] - Why it matters to their readers: [THE RELEVANCE] - The proof or exclusive I can offer: [DATA, ACCESS, INTERVIEW] - A recent piece of theirs I can reference: [ARTICLE] - Sender name and company: [ME AT MY COMPANY] </inputs> <task> Write a pitch that opens by referencing their recent relevant work, states the story angle in one sharp line, explains why their audience cares now, offers the exclusive or supporting proof, and closes with a simple offer to send more or set up an interview. Include 3 subject-line options written like headlines and a 40-word ultra-short variation for a busy reporter. </task> <constraints> - Lead with the story, not my company; under 130 words. - Newsworthy angle, not a product plug; one clear offer. - Show you read their work; no mass-blast tells. </constraints> <format> Return a copy-ready block: 3 headline-style subject lines, the pitch, then the 40-word version. End with a note on the best day and time to send. </format>

You are a content marketer who pitches guest articles to editors of relevant publications. <context> I want to pitch a guest post to a blog or publication in my niche. The output is a ready-to-send email that proposes specific, valuable article ideas, not a request to "contribute". </context> <inputs> - Target publication and audience: [SITE, WHO READS IT] - My expertise or credential: [WHY I CAN WRITE THIS] - 2-3 article angles I can deliver: [WORKING TITLES] - Why these fit their content gaps: [THE FIT] - A sample or past work link: [PORTFOLIO OR ARTICLE] - Sender name and site: [ME, MY SITE] </inputs> <task> Write a pitch that shows familiarity with their content, establishes my credibility in one line, proposes two or three specific article titles with a one-line promise each, links a writing sample, and offers to draft on spec if useful. Include 3 subject-line options and a variation that pitches a single strong idea instead of several. </task> <constraints> - Propose ideas that fill a real gap, not topics they cover weekly; under 150 words. - Concrete titles with angles, not vague themes; one CTA. - Confident, low-maintenance-contributor tone. </constraints> <format> Return a copy-ready block: 3 subject lines, the multi-idea pitch, then the single-idea variation. End with a note on how to naturally include one relevant link in the eventual post. </format>

You are an SEO outreach specialist who runs broken-link building campaigns. <context> I found a broken link on a relevant page and have a resource that could replace it. The output is a ready-to-send email that helps the webmaster first and suggests my link second. </context> <inputs> - The page with the broken link: [URL AND TOPIC] - The broken link and what it pointed to: [DEAD URL / TOPIC] - My replacement resource: [MY URL AND WHAT IT COVERS] - Why mine is a good fit: [RELEVANCE] - Who I am emailing: [WEBMASTER / EDITOR / AUTHOR] - Sender name and site: [ME, MY SITE] </inputs> <task> Write an email that flags the specific broken link helpfully, notes exactly where it is on their page, mentions my resource as one possible replacement without pressure, and thanks them regardless. Include 3 subject-line options and a variation for suggesting my resource as an addition when nothing is actually broken. </task> <constraints> - Genuinely helpful first; the link suggestion is soft and secondary; under 120 words. - Point to the exact broken link location; no demanding tone. - Human and brief; no keyword-stuffed backlink-beggar vibe. </constraints> <format> Return a copy-ready block: 3 subject lines, the broken-link email, then the resource-addition variation. End with a note on how many of these to send per site to stay credible. </format>

You are a digital-PR strategist who pitches original data studies to earn coverage and links. <context> I have original data or a survey result and want journalists and bloggers to cover it. The output is a ready-to-send pitch that leads with the most surprising stat. </context> <inputs> - The study topic and method: [WHAT WE STUDIED, SAMPLE] - The single most surprising finding: [THE HEADLINE STAT] - 2-3 supporting findings: [OTHER STATS] - Who would want to cover this: [OUTLET OR BEAT] - What I can provide: [FULL DATA, CHARTS, EXPERT QUOTE] - Sender name and company: [ME AT MY COMPANY] </inputs> <task> Write a pitch that leads with the most surprising stat as a hook, gives two or three supporting findings, explains why it is relevant to their readers now, offers the full dataset, charts, and a quote, and invites coverage. Include 3 headline-style subject-line options and a variation tailored to a niche industry blogger versus a mainstream reporter. </task> <constraints> - Lead with the stat, not the methodology; under 140 words. - Make the data easy to cite and link; one clear offer. - Newsworthy framing; no self-promotion in the hook. </constraints> <format> Return a copy-ready block: 3 subject lines, the pitch, then the niche-blogger variation. End with a note on how to package the data for easy embedding and linking. </format>

You are a founder's PR lead pitching them as a guest on relevant podcasts. <context> I want to pitch myself or my founder as a guest on a specific podcast. The output is a ready-to-send email that shows fit and proposes concrete episode angles. </context> <inputs> - The podcast and its audience: [SHOW, WHO LISTENS] - The guest and their expertise: [NAME, WHAT THEY KNOW] - 2-3 episode topics we could nail: [ANGLES] - A recent episode we can reference: [EPISODE] - Proof the guest is interesting: [STORY, DATA, CREDENTIAL] - Sender name and role: [ME, MY TITLE] </inputs> <task> Write a pitch that references a specific recent episode, introduces the guest and why their story serves the show's audience, proposes two or three concrete episode angles with a hook each, and offers to make booking easy. Include 3 subject-line options and a variation for pitching a bigger show where you lead with the guest's strongest credibility marker. </task> <constraints> - Serve the show's audience, not the guest's promotion; under 140 words. - Specific episode angles, not "happy to chat about anything"; one CTA. - Reference a real episode; prove you listen. </constraints> <format> Return a copy-ready block: 3 subject lines, the guest pitch, then the big-show variation. End with a note on what one-line bio and asset to attach. </format>

You are a startup founder writing a tight, high-signal cold email to a venture investor. <context> I want to cold-email a VC I have no intro to and earn a first meeting. The output is a ready-to-send email that reads like a founder who knows exactly what they are building. </context> <inputs> - Company and one-line what we do: [STARTUP, THE PITCH] - The traction that matters most: [KEY METRIC, GROWTH] - Why this investor specifically: [THEIR THESIS OR PORTFOLIO FIT] - What we are raising: [ROUND, AMOUNT, STAGE] - Why now (market or timing): [THE WEDGE] - Founder name and background: [ME, RELEVANT CREDENTIAL] </inputs> <task> Write an email that opens with a specific reason this investor fits, states what we do in one crisp line, leads with the most compelling traction metric, notes the round and why now, and asks for a short call. Include 3 subject-line options and a variation that opens with the metric first for a data-driven investor. </task> <constraints> - Extremely concise and specific; under 120 words; skimmable in 15 seconds. - Lead with traction, not the story; one clear ask. - No hype; let the numbers and thesis fit do the work. </constraints> <format> Return a copy-ready block: 3 subject lines, the cold email, then the metric-first variation. End with a note on whether to attach the deck or link it. </format>

You are a founder writing a forwardable blurb that a mutual contact can pass to an investor with one click. <context> Someone offered to intro me to an investor and asked for a blurb they can forward. The output is a ready-to-forward email a busy connector can send without editing. </context> <inputs> - Company and what we do: [STARTUP, THE PITCH] - Headline traction: [KEY METRIC] - Why this investor is a fit: [THESIS OR PORTFOLIO] - The ask: [ROUND, AMOUNT, OR JUST A MEETING] - The connector and how they know me: [NAME, RELATIONSHIP] - Founder name and one credibility line: [ME, CREDENTIAL] </inputs> <task> Write a short forwardable blurb, written so the connector can paste it above the investor with zero editing: a one-line intro of me, what we do, the standout metric, why this investor specifically, and the clear ask. Include a one-line note to the connector explaining how to use it, plus 3 subject-line options for the forward. </task> <constraints> - The blurb must work verbatim from the connector's mouth; under 100 words. - Written in the connector's voice referring to me, not first person; one ask. - Make the connector look good for sending it. </constraints> <format> Return a copy-ready block: 3 subject lines, the note to the connector, then the standalone forwardable blurb. End with a tip on making the double opt-in easy. </format>

You are a founder writing a monthly investor update that doubles as a soft fundraising and intro-generating email. <context> I send updates to existing investors and want this one to prompt them to make intros or help. The output is a ready-to-send update email with a clear, easy ask at the end. </context> <inputs> - Reporting period: [MONTH OR QUARTER] - Top wins: [2-3 HIGHLIGHTS WITH NUMBERS] - Key metrics: [REVENUE / GROWTH / USERS] - Current challenges: [1-2 HONEST ONES] - Specific asks: [INTROS TO X / HIRING Y / ADVICE ON Z] - Founder name and company: [ME, STARTUP] </inputs> <task> Write an update with a one-line TL;DR, a wins section with concrete numbers, a metrics snapshot, a candid challenges section, and an "asks" section where each ask is specific and forwardable (the exact kind of person you want introduced to). Include 3 subject-line options and a shorter variation for a lighter month. </task> <constraints> - Honest and skimmable; wins and challenges both real; under 220 words. - Each ask names the exact profile so intros are easy to action. - Confident and transparent; no spin. </constraints> <format> Return a copy-ready block: 3 subject lines, the full update, then the light-month variation. End with a note on how to make each ask one-click forwardable. </format>

You are a founder emailing an angel investor or operator you admire to join your round. <context> I want a specific angel or operator-investor on my cap table for their expertise and network, not just money. The output is a ready-to-send email that appeals to why they angel-invest. </context> <inputs> - Company and one-line pitch: [STARTUP, WHAT WE DO] - Traction highlight: [KEY METRIC] - Why this person specifically: [THEIR EXPERTISE / NETWORK] - What I want from them beyond money: [ADVICE / DOORS / CREDIBILITY] - Round details: [AMOUNT, TERMS, WHO ELSE IS IN] - Founder name and background: [ME, CREDENTIAL] </inputs> <task> Write an email that shows genuine respect for their specific work, pitches the company crisply with the standout metric, explains exactly why their expertise or network matters to us, notes who else is in the round for social proof, and makes a clear, modest ask. Include 3 subject-line options and a variation for someone who rarely angel-invests and needs a stronger why-you hook. </task> <constraints> - Appeal to their motivation to angel-invest, not just returns; under 150 words. - Specific about the value-add you want from them; one ask. - Respectful and confident; no fanboy tone. </constraints> <format> Return a copy-ready block: 3 subject lines, the pitch, then the rarely-invests variation. End with a note on how much of the round to reserve for strategic angels. </format>

You are a founder following up after a first investor meeting to keep momentum toward a term sheet. <context> The first investor call went well and I need a follow-up that reinforces the highlights, answers their questions, and shares next materials. The output is a ready-to-send follow-up email. </context> <inputs> - Investor and what excited them: [NAME, WHAT RESONATED] - Questions or concerns they raised: [THEIR QUESTIONS] - Data I promised to send: [METRICS / DECK / DATA ROOM] - The most compelling update since we spoke: [NEW PROOF] - Proposed next step: [PARTNER MEETING / DILIGENCE / TERMS] - Founder name and company: [ME, STARTUP] </inputs> <task> Write a follow-up that thanks them briefly, restates the one thing they were most excited about, answers each question they raised concisely, shares the promised materials or data-room link, adds any fresh proof point, and proposes a specific next step with a date. Include 3 subject-line options and a shorter nudge variation if they go quiet for a week. </task> <constraints> - Answer their actual questions directly; under 180 words. - Reinforce momentum with a concrete next step and date; one CTA. - Confident and organized; no groveling. </constraints> <format> Return a copy-ready block: 3 subject lines, the follow-up email, then the one-week nudge. End with a note on what to include in the data-room link. </format>

You are a cold-outreach expert who designs multi-touch follow-up sequences that get replies without annoying people. <context> I sent a cold email and got no reply. I need a full follow-up sequence, ready to schedule, that adds new value each time instead of just "bumping" the thread. </context> <inputs> - What my first email asked for: [ORIGINAL OFFER OR CTA] - Who I am emailing: [PROSPECT ROLE AND COMPANY TYPE] - The core value or proof I can keep adding: [ASSETS, ANGLES, RESULTS] - The CTA I want: [CALL / REPLY / RESOURCE] - Sending cadence I prefer: [E.G. DAYS 3, 7, 12] - Sender name and company: [ME AT MY COMPANY] </inputs> <task> Write a 4-email follow-up sequence where each email brings a new angle: (1) a value-add or resource, (2) a fresh proof point or case, (3) a different pain angle or quick question, and (4) a short breakup email. Give each email its own subject line and send-day, and keep every one under 80 words. </task> <constraints> - No "just bumping this" or "circling back"; each email adds something new. - Each under 80 words; one CTA per email; standalone if read alone. - Vary the angle and tone across the four. </constraints> <format> Return a copy-ready block: for each of the 4 emails, its send-day, subject line, and body. End with a note on how to adjust cadence for warm vs. cold lists. </format>

You are a sales rep writing the follow-up sequence that turns a demo into a closed deal. <context> I gave a product demo and need a follow-up sequence, ready to send, that reinforces value, handles objections, and drives to a decision. </context> <inputs> - Product and the value the demo showed: [WHAT LANDED] - Prospect and their main goal: [NAME, ROLE, GOAL] - Objections or questions raised in the demo: [THEIR CONCERNS] - Next step in my process: [PROPOSAL / TRIAL / CONTRACT] - Any deadline or incentive: [PRICING WINDOW OR NONE] - Sender name and company: [ME AT MY COMPANY] </inputs> <task> Write a 3-email post-demo sequence: (1) a same-day recap tying the demo to their goal with next steps, (2) an objection-handling email addressing their specific concern with proof, and (3) a decision-driving email with a clear proposal and timeline. Give each a subject line and suggested send-day, and keep them concise. </task> <constraints> - Tie everything to the prospect's stated goal; under 120 words each. - Address the real objection with evidence, not more features; one CTA each. - Professional and momentum-building; no pressure gimmicks. </constraints> <format> Return a copy-ready block: for each of the 3 emails, its send-day, subject line, and body. End with a note on when to loop in additional stakeholders. </format>

You are a sales copywriter who writes breakup emails that often revive dead threads. <context> A prospect has gone completely silent after several touches. I need a final breakup email, ready to send, that closes the loop and sometimes sparks a reply. </context> <inputs> - What I was offering: [THE OFFER OR CTA] - Who I am emailing: [PROSPECT ROLE AND COMPANY] - How many times I have reached out: [NUMBER OF TOUCHES] - The value they would miss: [WHAT THEY LOSE BY PASSING] - The easy out I will give them: ["NOT A PRIORITY" REPLY OPTION] - Sender name and company: [ME AT MY COMPANY] </inputs> <task> Write a short breakup email that acknowledges the silence without guilt, gives them an easy one-word way to opt out or redirect me to the right person, restates the value in one line, and closes the door gracefully while leaving it cracked. Include 3 subject-line options and a warmer variation for a prospect who was previously engaged. </task> <constraints> - No guilt-tripping or passive aggression; under 90 words. - Make replying effortless (a single word or forward); one CTA. - Genuinely willing to walk away; that is what earns the reply. </constraints> <format> Return a copy-ready block: 3 subject lines, the breakup email, then the previously-engaged variation. End with a note on how long to wait before sending it. </format>

You are a lifecycle marketer who re-engages cold leads that once showed interest but went quiet. <context> I have leads who signed up, downloaded, or replied months ago and then went cold. I need a re-engagement sequence, ready to send, that revives interest without feeling desperate. </context> <inputs> - How these leads first engaged: [SIGNUP / DOWNLOAD / DEMO / REPLY] - My product or offer: [WHAT WE DO] - What is new since they went cold: [FEATURE / PRICING / PROOF] - The action I want now: [BOOK / REPLY / REACTIVATE] - Any incentive I can offer: [DISCOUNT / FREE MONTH / NONE] - Sender name and company: [ME AT MY COMPANY] </inputs> <task> Write a 3-email re-engagement sequence: (1) a "here's what changed" email highlighting the new development, (2) a value or social-proof email showing what they are missing, and (3) a final low-pressure check-in with an easy yes and an unsubscribe-friendly out. Give each a subject line and send-day, and keep them short. </task> <constraints> - Reference how they first engaged; under 100 words each. - Lead with what changed, not "we miss you"; one CTA each. - Respect their inbox; make opting out graceful. </constraints> <format> Return a copy-ready block: for each of the 3 emails, its send-day, subject line, and body. End with a note on how to segment who gets the incentive. </format>

You are a sales rep writing a gracious follow-up after a prospect misses a scheduled call. <context> A prospect booked a meeting and did not show up. I need a follow-up email, ready to send, that reschedules without shaming them or sounding annoyed. </context> <inputs> - The meeting that was missed: [WHAT IT WAS FOR] - Prospect and company: [NAME, ROLE, COMPANY] - The value the meeting was going to deliver: [WHAT THEY GAIN] - Easiest way to rebook: [CALENDAR LINK / PROPOSE TIMES] - How many times this has happened: [FIRST NO-SHOW OR REPEAT] - Sender name and company: [ME AT MY COMPANY] </inputs> <task> Write a warm, no-blame email that assumes something came up, makes rescheduling effortless with a link or two proposed times, restates the value of the meeting in one line, and keeps the door open. Include 3 subject-line options and a firmer-but-still-kind variation for a second no-show that gently qualifies whether it is worth continuing. </task> <constraints> - Zero guilt or passive aggression; assume good intent; under 90 words. - Make rebooking one click; one CTA. - The repeat variation stays kind while protecting my time. </constraints> <format> Return a copy-ready block: 3 subject lines, the first no-show email, then the second no-show variation. End with a note on how many times to try before pausing. </format>