Claude Prompt Library

Negotiate With Structured Thinking, Not Guesswork

20 copy-paste prompts

20 Claude prompts for salary negotiations, vendor deals, contract reviews, and difficult conversations — grounded in BATNA, ZOPA, and anchoring frameworks Claude reasons through.

Salary & Offers

5 prompts

Salary Negotiation Script

1/20

<task>Build salary negotiation strategy</task> <offer>[describe]</offer> <leverage>[alternatives, skills, wins]</leverage> <market_data>[paste]</market_data> <output> 1. Target + walk-away with reasoning 2. Anchor opening (confident, data-backed) 3. 3 objection-handlers for "above range" 4. Counter-offer script 5. Non-base items to negotiate (bonus, equity, PTO, remote) </output>

Builds complete salary negotiation with anchor, objection-handlers, and non-base alternatives.

💡

Pro tip: First number spoken = anchor. Flip recruiter's "what's your range?" to your own anchor: "Based on market data, I'm looking at $X-Y. Workable?"

Counter-Offer Email

2/20

<task>Write counter-offer email</task> <offer>[describe]</offer> <counter>[target]</counter> <output> - Gratitude without groveling - Specifically counter with reasoning - 2-3 reasons (experience, competing interest) - End with confidence No apology.

Writes counter-offer emails with confident framing and no apology.

💡

Pro tip: Never apologize when negotiating. "I know this is more than discussed, but..." signals weakness. Replace with "I've reflected on scope and market — $X works."

Raise Request Script

3/20

<task>Prepare raise request</task> <role>[describe]</role> <accomplishments>[specifics with numbers]</accomplishments> <output> 1. Pre-meeting case document 2. Opening 60 seconds 3. How to frame ask 4. Objection-handlers ("not in budget", "not this year") 5. Follow-up email </output>

Prepares raise requests with case, opening, objection-handlers, and follow-up.

💡

Pro tip: Raises aren't given for effort — for impact. Your case should be "here's what I delivered worth $X" not "here's how many hours I worked." Quantify.

Multiple Offer Leverage

4/20

<task>Leverage multiple offers</task> <offers>[describe]</offers> <preferred>[describe]</preferred> <output> 1. Tactful disclosure email 2. Non-ultimatum phrasing 3. Specific asks (base, signing, equity) 4. Handling "can't match" 5. Ethical boundaries — never bluff </output>

Navigates multiple-offer leverage with tactful disclosure and ethical boundaries.

💡

Pro tip: Never bluff about offers. Industry is small; getting caught destroys relationships. Use real offers; negotiate on merit otherwise. One lie undoes ten years of reputation.

Remote/Flexibility Negotiation

5/20

<task>Negotiate remote work / 4-day week / sabbatical</task> <current>[describe]</current> <ask>[specify]</ask> <leverage>[describe]</leverage> <output> 1. Business case framed in their benefit 2. Proposed structure with safeguards 3. Objection-handlers 4. Trial-period framing 5. Written proposal template </output>

Negotiates flexibility with business-case framing and trial-period offers.

💡

Pro tip: Frame flexibility asks as mutual benefit. "I can deliver better outcomes with X" beats "I want X personally." Same ask, different response.

XML tags are just the start. Learn the full Claude workflow.

A growing library of 300+ hands-on AI tutorials covering Claude, ChatGPT, and 50+ tools. New tutorials added every week.

Start 7-Day Free Trial

Vendors & Contracts

5 prompts

Vendor Price Negotiation

6/20

<task>Negotiate vendor contract</task> <vendor>[describe]</vendor> <quote>[describe]</quote> <leverage>[alternatives, volume]</leverage> <target>[describe]</target> <output> 1. Anchored opening 2. Specific asks ranked 3. Concessions willing (longer contract, prepay) 4. Objection-handlers 5. Walk-away 6. Email/call script </output>

Builds vendor negotiation with anchored opening, ranked asks, and concessions.

💡

Pro tip: Most quotes include 10-20% padding for negotiation. Never accept first price. "Is there flexibility?" recovers margin without conflict.

Contract Review Checklist

7/20

<task>Review contract for negotiation leverage</task> <contract>[describe key terms]</contract> <our_role>[buyer / seller]</our_role> <output> 1. Unfavorable clauses 2. Red-flag language 3. Missing protections to request 4. Leverage points 5. Boilerplate vs negotiable 6. Priority order </output>

Reviews contracts for leverage with priority-ordered negotiation points.

💡

Pro tip: Contracts are 80% boilerplate, 20% deal-specific. Focus on indemnification, payment, termination, IP. Boilerplate disputes eat time without real benefit.

SaaS Renewal

8/20

<task>Negotiate SaaS renewal</task> <vendor>[describe]</vendor> <current_spend>[describe]</current_spend> <alternatives>[describe]</alternatives> <output> 1. Renewal conversation script 2. Specific asks (reduction, feature unlock, multi-year lock) 3. Leverage points (competitor quotes, budget pressure) 4. Timing — when to start 5. Escalation path </output>

Negotiates SaaS renewals with leverage, escalation, and multi-year terms.

💡

Pro tip: SaaS vendors dread losing accounts. Start renewal conversations 60-90 days before expiration. Mention you're "evaluating alternatives" — price almost always moves.

Scope Change Negotiation

9/20

<task>Negotiate scope change with client</task> <original>[describe]</original> <new_request>[describe]</new_request> <output> 1. "Yes and" framing script 2. Pricing for additional work 3. Change order documentation 4. Relationship preservation 5. "Thought it was included" handling </output>

Negotiates scope changes with "yes and" framing and documentation.

💡

Pro tip: Scope creep kills service businesses. "Yes, we can do that — it'll add $X and extend 2 weeks" beats both "no" and silent acceptance.

Partnership Terms

10/20

<task>Negotiate partnership terms</task> <our_contribution>[describe]</our_contribution> <their_contribution>[describe]</their_contribution> <output> 1. Fair split proposal 2. Rights + decision-making clauses 3. Exit clauses 4. IP + confidentiality 5. Non-compete boundaries </output>

Negotiates partnerships with fair splits, exit clauses, and IP terms.

💡

Pro tip: Partnerships die on exit clauses, not opening terms. Negotiate divorce when everyone's in love. "What if one of us wants out in 2 years?" is most valuable JV question.

Difficult Conversations

5 prompts

Performance Conversation

11/20

<task>Prepare performance conversation with employee</task> <issue>[describe]</issue> <desired_outcome>[describe]</desired_outcome> <output> 1. Direct non-accusatory opening 2. Specific examples to cite 3. Impact on team/business 4. Change needed 5. Agreed next steps with dates 6. Follow-up email </output>

Prepares performance conversations with specific examples and agreed next steps.

💡

Pro tip: Vague performance talks fail. Specific observations with clear impact ("X happened, Y broke, Z behind") are undeniable. Data prevents emotional debates.

Difficult Email

12/20

<task>Write difficult email about [issue]</task> <recipient>[describe]</recipient> <goal>[describe]</goal> <output> Acknowledge context (not excessive apology) → state message directly 1-2 sentences → explain briefly → path forward → close warmly. No passive voice, no walls of justification.

Writes difficult emails with direct messaging and minimal over-apology.

💡

Pro tip: Difficult emails are shorter than you think. Long emails signal anxiety, invite nit-picking. Say it in 2 sentences; explain briefly.

Saying No Gracefully

13/20

<task>Say no to [request]</task> <context>[describe]</context> <relationship>[boss / peer / client]</relationship> <output> 2-3 sentence no script, one specific reason, alternative if genuine, pushback handling, variations for written/verbal. No excessive apology.

Builds "no" scripts with single reason, alternative, and pushback handling.

💡

Pro tip: Over-apologizing for no weakens it and invites pressure. "Thanks for thinking of me — can't take this on right now" is enough.

Termination Script

14/20

<task>Prepare termination conversation</task> <context>[describe]</context> <severance>[describe]</severance> <output> 1. Direct opening (no misleading softening) 2. Decision is final 3. Logistics (last day, severance, COBRA) 4. Emotional response handling 5. What NOT to say (legal risk) 6. Post-conversation checklist </output>

Prepares terminations with direct opening, logistics, and legal guardrails.

💡

Pro tip: Terminations go wrong with softening that misleads. Be direct in sentence 2: "This is a termination conversation." Softening prolongs anxiety.

Boundary-Setting

15/20

<task>Set boundary with [person]</task> <pattern>[describe]</pattern> <desired_outcome>[describe]</desired_outcome> <output> 1. Name the pattern non-accusatorily 2. Specific boundary 3. Consequence if crossed 4. Pushback handling 5. Follow-up enforcement </output>

Sets boundaries with non-accusatory language, specific terms, and enforcement.

💡

Pro tip: Boundaries without consequences are requests. "I'll need you to X, and if not, I'll Y." Consequence makes boundary real. Vague boundaries get crossed.

Frameworks

5 prompts

BATNA Analysis

16/20

<task>Analyze BATNA for [negotiation]</task> <situation>[describe]</situation> <output> 1. All alternatives if negotiation fails 2. Rank by attractiveness 3. Strongest BATNA 4. How to strengthen before negotiation 5. How to reference during (without bluffing) 6. When to walk </output>

Analyzes BATNA with alternatives ranking, strengthening, and walk triggers.

💡

Pro tip: Your BATNA is your real power. Weak BATNA = give in to avoid losing deal. Strengthen BATNA BEFORE negotiation (other offers, vendors, buyers), not during.

ZOPA Mapping

17/20

<task>Map ZOPA</task> <my_position>[target + walkaway]</my_position> <their_position>[estimate]</their_position> <output> 1. Overlap zone 2. Signals revealing their walkaway 3. Widen ZOPA — add variables 4. Creative trades 5. Opening anchor at far edge 6. Concession strategy </output>

Maps ZOPA with overlap, creative trades, and anchor/concession strategy.

💡

Pro tip: Narrow ZOPA? Widen by adding variables. If price is fixed, trade timeline, volume, exclusivity. Best negotiators create value, not just divide it.

Anchor Strategy

18/20

<task>Design opening anchor</task> <market>[describe]</market> <target>[number]</target> <output> 1. Specific opening (precise, backed) 2. Delivery method 3. Justifying story 4. How to hold firm vs counter-anchor 5. When/how much to move </output>

Designs anchor strategy with precise numbers, justification, and concession discipline.

💡

Pro tip: Precise anchors ($47,850) beat round numbers ($50,000). Precision signals research. Round numbers get haggled; precise numbers get debated.

Concession Strategy

19/20

<task>Plan concession strategy</task> <anchor>[number]</anchor> <walkaway>[number]</walkaway> <output> 1. Gap I can concede 2. Pacing (big first, smaller after) 3. Ask for something back per concession 4. Verbal markers ("this is a stretch") </output>

Plans concessions with pacing, reciprocity, and "stretch" verbal markers.

💡

Pro tip: Always ask for something back when conceding. Unilateral concessions train other side to keep pushing. Every concession should cost them something.

Role-Play Simulator

20/20

<task>Role-play negotiation counterpart for [scenario]</task> <their_role>[describe]</their_role> <style>[hard / soft / collaborative]</style> <output> 5 rounds: you open anchor → I respond → pushback → counter → close. Realistic pressure tactics. Coaching after each round.

Runs 5-round negotiation role-plays with pressure tactics and per-round coaching.

💡

Pro tip: Negotiations are muscle memory. Role-play with Claude 3-5 times before high-stakes negotiations. Responses become second nature instead of improvised.

Frequently Asked Questions

Claude's structured thinking (BATNA, ZOPA, Four Actions) and role-play capability dramatically accelerate negotiation prep. It's patient, doesn't get tired, and can run the same scenario 5 different ways.
Yes — specify their style (hard/soft/collaborative), priorities, and likely tactics. Claude brings realistic pressure, silence, flinches. Best used 3-5 times before a real negotiation.
Claude excels at spotting unfavorable clauses, missing protections, and sneaky provisions hidden in innocuous sections. Always pair with human lawyer review for signing — but Claude catches 80% before that review.
Claude won't help you bluff, lie, or use manipulative tactics. It defaults to principled negotiation (Fisher/Ury) over adversarial tactics. This is a feature — bluff-based negotiation costs long-term reputation.
Real-time market data — salary benchmarks, industry rates, competitor pricing. Feed it current data you've gathered; Claude's frameworks apply it rigorously.

Prompts are the starting line. Tutorials are the finish.

A growing library of 300+ hands-on tutorials on ChatGPT, Claude, Midjourney, and 50+ AI tools. New tutorials added every week.

7-day free trial. Cancel anytime.