20 Claude Prompts for Sales That Actually Close Deals
XML-structured prompts designed for how Claude processes sales context. Prospect smarter, write sharper outreach, and handle objections — all with Claude-native formatting.
Prospecting & Research
4 promptsDeep Account Research Brief
1/20<context> I'm a [role, e.g. Account Executive] selling [product/service] to [target market, e.g. mid-market SaaS companies]. I'm preparing to reach out to [company name], a [brief description of prospect company]. Their website is [URL]. </context> <task> Build a pre-call research brief for this account covering: 1. Company overview (what they do, who they serve, business model) 2. Recent news, funding rounds, executive hires, or product launches from the last 6 months 3. Likely pain points based on their industry, size, and stage 4. How our product ([describe product]) maps to those pain points 5. 3 personalized conversation starters I could use in outreach 6. Key decision-makers and their likely priorities (based on typical org structures at this company size) </task> <constraints> - Be specific — don't give me generic industry observations I could find on any blog - Flag anything you're uncertain about with "[VERIFY]" so I know what to fact-check - Focus on insights that would make the prospect think "this person actually understands my business" - Keep the brief under 500 words — I need to scan it before a call, not read a report </constraints> <format> Use clear headers for each section. Bullet points, not paragraphs. </format>
Generates a focused account research brief with pain points, conversation starters, and stakeholder insights before outreach.
Pro tip: Create a Claude Project called "Account Research" and add your product one-pager and ICP document as project knowledge — every research brief will automatically reference your positioning.
Build an Ideal Customer Profile
2/20<context> I sell [product/service] at [company]. Our best customers include [list 3-5 current customer names and what they have in common]. Our average deal size is [amount] and sales cycle is [length]. We win most often against [competitor] and lose most often against [competitor]. </context> <task> Build a detailed Ideal Customer Profile (ICP) document that includes: 1. Firmographic criteria (industry, company size, revenue range, geography, tech stack signals) 2. Trigger events that indicate buying readiness (hiring patterns, funding, tech migration, leadership changes) 3. Pain indicators — specific symptoms a prospect experiences before they need our solution 4. Anti-patterns — characteristics of companies that look like a fit but consistently churn or stall in pipeline 5. A qualification scoring rubric (1-5 scale across 5 dimensions) I can use to rank new leads </task> <constraints> - Ground everything in the patterns from my actual customer examples — don't just list generic B2B criteria - The scoring rubric should be practical enough for an SDR to use in under 60 seconds - Include specific phrases to listen for on discovery calls that signal high ICP fit </constraints> <format> Structure as a reference document with sections I can share with my sales team. </format>
Creates a data-grounded ICP document with firmographics, trigger events, anti-patterns, and a lead scoring rubric.
Pro tip: Use extended thinking for this prompt — Claude will reason more deeply about the patterns across your customer examples before generating the ICP.
Lead Scoring Framework
3/20<context> I'm a [sales ops / rev ops / sales manager] at [company]. We sell [product] to [target buyer persona] at [target company type]. Our CRM is [Salesforce/HubSpot/etc.]. Right now we don't have a structured lead scoring model — reps prioritize leads based on gut feel. </context> <task> Design a lead scoring framework with: 1. Demographic/firmographic scoring criteria (title, company size, industry) with point values 2. Behavioral scoring criteria (website visits, content downloads, email engagement, demo requests) with point values 3. Negative scoring signals (competitor employee, student email, unsubscribed, etc.) 4. Score thresholds: MQL, SQL, and "fast-track to AE" with specific point ranges 5. A recommended handoff process from marketing to SDR to AE based on score </task> <constraints> - Total possible score should be 100 points - Weight behavioral signals more heavily than demographic — intent matters more than fit alone - Include at least 3 "fast-track" triggers that bypass normal scoring (e.g., pricing page visit + demo request in same session) - Make it implementable in [CRM name] without custom development </constraints> <format> Return as a structured document with tables for each scoring category. </format>
Builds a complete lead scoring model with demographic, behavioral, and negative signals plus CRM implementation guidance.
Pro tip: Ask Claude to generate this as an artifact — you can then iterate on the point values and export it directly to share with your ops team.
Competitive Intelligence Briefing
4/20<context> I sell [product/service] and I'm competing against [competitor name] on a deal with [prospect company]. The prospect is evaluating both solutions for [use case]. My champion at the prospect has told me the competitor is [any intel you have — pricing, demo feedback, features mentioned]. </context> <task> Create a competitive battle card for this specific deal: 1. Likely positioning the competitor will use (based on their public messaging and typical sales plays) 2. Their strengths I should NOT try to argue against — acknowledge and redirect 3. Our differentiators that matter most for this specific use case 4. Landmine questions I can plant in the prospect's mind before they see the competitor demo 5. If the prospect says "Competitor X can do that too," give me 3 responses that reframe the conversation around outcomes, not features 6. Trap topics to avoid — areas where engaging would work in the competitor's favor </task> <constraints> - Be strategic, not petty — never trash the competitor directly - Frame everything around the prospect's outcomes, not our features - Landmine questions should sound like genuine curiosity, not attacks - If you don't have enough information about the competitor, flag what I should research </constraints>
Creates a deal-specific competitive battle card with landmine questions, reframing responses, and strategic positioning.
Pro tip: Save your product positioning doc and competitor comparison notes in a Claude Project — Claude will generate sharper battle cards when it has your full competitive context.
XML tags are just the start. Learn the full Claude workflow.
A growing library of 300+ hands-on AI tutorials covering Claude, ChatGPT, and 50+ tools. New tutorials added every week.
Cold Outreach
4 promptsPersonalized Cold Email
5/20<context> I'm a [role] at [company]. We help [target persona] solve [core problem] by [how product works in one sentence]. I'm reaching out to [prospect name], [prospect title] at [prospect company]. Here's what I know about them: - Company: [what they do, size, recent news] - Prospect: [background, LinkedIn summary, recent posts or activity] - Trigger: [why now — hiring, funding, product launch, job change, etc.] </context> <task> Write a cold email that: 1. Opens with a specific observation about their company or role (NOT a compliment — an insight) 2. Connects that observation to a problem they likely face 3. Positions our solution in one sentence without jargon 4. Includes a low-friction CTA (not "Let me know if you'd like a 30-minute demo") 5. Is under 120 words total </task> <constraints> - No "I hope this finds you well" or any filler opening - No bullet lists of features — this is a first touch, not a pitch deck - The email should make the prospect think "this person did their homework" - Subject line should be under 6 words, lowercase, and curiosity-driven - Write 3 variations with different angles so I can A/B test </constraints> <format> For each variation, provide: Subject line, Email body, and a one-line note explaining the angle. </format>
Generates three personalized cold email variations with research-backed openings, insight-led hooks, and low-friction CTAs.
Pro tip: Paste the prospect's actual LinkedIn "About" section into the context — Claude will pick up on specific language and priorities to personalize the email.
LinkedIn Connection Message Sequence
6/20<context> I'm a [role] at [company] targeting [buyer persona] at [company type]. I want to connect with [prospect name], [title] at [prospect company] on LinkedIn. What I know about them: [any context — mutual connections, shared content, company news]. </context> <task> Write a 3-touch LinkedIn sequence: 1. Connection request note (under 300 characters) — no selling, just a relevant reason to connect 2. First message after they accept (sent 2 days later) — share a relevant insight or resource, plant a seed about the problem we solve 3. Follow-up message (sent 5 days after message 1) — soft ask for a conversation, reference something specific For each message, also write an alternative version if the prospect has NOT engaged at all (cold follow-up path). </task> <constraints> - Connection request must NOT mention my product or ask for a meeting - Messages should feel like peer-to-peer conversation, not sales outreach - Each message must be under 500 characters (LinkedIn truncates longer messages) - Reference specific, real-sounding content or insights — not "I came across an interesting article" - No "pick your brain" or "I'd love to learn more about your role" filler </constraints>
Creates a three-touch LinkedIn outreach sequence with connection request, value-first message, and warm follow-up.
Pro tip: Run this prompt once per persona type and save the best-performing sequences as project knowledge in Claude — then you only need to swap in prospect-specific details.
Multi-Touch Follow-Up Sequence
7/20<context> I sent a cold email to [prospect name], [title] at [company] about [topic/solution] on [date]. They haven't responded. Here's the original email I sent: [paste original email] I know the following about this prospect: [any additional context — industry, company size, recent activity]. </context> <task> Write a 4-email follow-up sequence spaced over 3 weeks: 1. Follow-up 1 (Day 3): Brief bump with a new angle or piece of value — NOT "just following up" 2. Follow-up 2 (Day 7): Share a relevant insight, case study reference, or data point that reframes the problem 3. Follow-up 3 (Day 14): Pattern interrupt — different format, tone, or approach entirely 4. Follow-up 4 (Day 21): Breakup email — respectful close that leaves the door open Each email should be under 80 words. Include subject lines for each. </task> <constraints> - Never reference that they haven't replied — no guilt-tripping - Each email must stand alone as valuable even if they didn't read the previous ones - Follow-up 3 should be the most creative — try humor, a counterintuitive question, or a bold claim - The breakup email should make them want to respond, not feel relieved you stopped - No "just circling back" or "wanted to bump this to the top of your inbox" </constraints>
Builds a four-part follow-up sequence with escalating angles, a pattern interrupt, and a strategic breakup email.
Pro tip: Use Claude's extended thinking mode for the pattern interrupt email — it generates more creative, non-obvious approaches when given time to reason.
Warm Referral Request
8/20<context> I'm a [role] at [company]. I have a good relationship with [referrer name], who is [their role/relationship to me — customer, former colleague, partner, etc.]. I want to ask them for an introduction to [target prospect name], [title] at [target company]. The connection between referrer and target: [how they know each other — LinkedIn connection, former colleagues, same industry group, etc.]. </context> <task> Write three things: 1. A message to my referrer asking for the intro — make it easy for them to say yes by explaining exactly why I want the intro and what I'll say (no "I promise I won't be salesy") 2. A suggested "forwardable blurb" my referrer can copy-paste when making the intro — written from their perspective, under 100 words 3. My response to the introduction email/message once the referrer connects us — acknowledge the referrer, establish relevance, and propose a specific next step </task> <constraints> - The referral request should take under 30 seconds for my referrer to act on — minimize their effort - The forwardable blurb should position me as a peer, not a vendor - Don't oversell — the referral itself is the credibility, not the pitch - Keep each piece under 100 words </constraints>
Creates a complete referral package: the ask, a forwardable intro blurb, and your follow-through message.
Pro tip: If you have the referrer's communication style in mind, mention it in the context — Claude will match the tone so the forwardable blurb sounds like it came from them.
Discovery & Qualification
4 promptsDiscovery Call Question Framework
9/20<context> I'm a [role] selling [product/service] to [buyer persona] at [company type]. I have a discovery call scheduled with [prospect name], [title] at [prospect company]. What I know so far: [any intel — how they found us, what they said when booking, their company situation]. Our typical sales process is [describe: e.g., discovery → demo → proposal → close]. </context> <task> Build a discovery call framework with: 1. 3 rapport-building openers tied to something specific about the prospect (not weather or sports) 2. 5 situation questions to understand their current state (without sounding like a survey) 3. 5 pain questions that dig into consequences and costs of the status quo 4. 3 implication questions that help the prospect realize the problem is bigger than they thought 5. 2 need-payoff questions that get the prospect to articulate why solving this matters 6. A recommended "next step" close for different scenarios (interested, uncertain, or not ready) </task> <constraints> - Questions should feel conversational, not interrogative — suggest natural transitions between them - Include follow-up probes for when a prospect gives a surface-level answer - Flag which questions to skip if the call is running short (mark as "skip if under 20 min") - Never ask a question whose answer is easily found on their website </constraints> <format> Organize by call phase with estimated time for each section. </format>
Creates a complete discovery call script organized by phase, with conversational transitions and follow-up probes.
Pro tip: Save this in a Claude Project and iterate after each call — paste your call notes and ask Claude to refine the questions based on what actually resonated.
Pain Point Quantification
10/20<context> I'm selling [product/service] to [buyer persona]. During a recent discovery call with [prospect name] at [prospect company], they mentioned these pain points: 1. [Pain point 1 — in the prospect's own words] 2. [Pain point 2 — in the prospect's own words] 3. [Pain point 3 — in the prospect's own words] Their company has [X employees], approximately [revenue/size context], and operates in [industry]. </context> <task> For each pain point, help me quantify the business impact: 1. Calculate the estimated annual cost of inaction using reasonable assumptions (time wasted, revenue leaked, productivity lost, employee turnover cost) 2. Show your math — break down each assumption so I can validate or adjust the numbers 3. Suggest 2 follow-up questions I can ask the prospect to get their real numbers (instead of my estimates) 4. Write a one-sentence "cost of inaction" statement I can use in my proposal or follow-up email </task> <constraints> - Use conservative estimates — a prospect will dismiss inflated numbers instantly - Label every assumption clearly so the prospect can swap in their actual data - The "cost of inaction" statements should be specific enough to cite in an executive email, not vague ROI claims - If a pain point can't be reasonably quantified, say so and suggest a qualitative framing instead </constraints>
Quantifies prospect pain points into dollar amounts with transparent assumptions and follow-up questions to validate the numbers.
Pro tip: Enable extended thinking for this prompt — Claude will reason more carefully through the cost calculations and produce more defensible estimates.
Stakeholder Mapping
11/20<context> I'm working a deal at [prospect company] for [product/service]. The deal size is approximately [amount] and involves [department/team affected]. Here's everyone I've interacted with or heard about so far: - [Name 1]: [Title], [what they've said or how they've engaged] - [Name 2]: [Title], [what they've said or how they've engaged] - [Name 3]: [Title], [what they've said or how they've engaged] The buying process at this company seems to involve [any intel on how they buy]. </context> <task> Create a stakeholder map for this deal: 1. Classify each person's role: Champion, Economic Buyer, Technical Evaluator, End User, Blocker, or Coach 2. Assess their current disposition: Supportive, Neutral, or Resistant — with reasoning 3. Identify gaps — roles that should be involved but aren't in my map yet (and suggest titles to look for) 4. For each stakeholder, recommend: what they care about most, the message that resonates with their role, and one action I should take to advance their support 5. Flag the single biggest risk in this deal based on the stakeholder landscape </task> <constraints> - Don't assume everyone is supportive just because they took a meeting - If someone's role is unclear from my notes, mark them as "ambiguous" and suggest questions to clarify - Be direct about political dynamics — if two stakeholders likely have competing priorities, call it out </constraints> <format> Return as a visual-friendly table plus a narrative risk summary. </format>
Maps every deal stakeholder by role and disposition, identifies gaps, and flags the biggest risk in your buying committee.
Pro tip: Update this stakeholder map after every meeting — paste your latest call notes into the same Claude Project thread and ask Claude to revise the map.
Needs Analysis Summary
12/20<context> I just finished a discovery call with [prospect name], [title] at [prospect company]. Here are my raw call notes: [Paste your call notes, transcription, or bullet points from the call] We sell [product/service] and our key capabilities are [list 3-5 main features/capabilities]. </context> <task> Synthesize these call notes into a structured needs analysis: 1. Current State: What the prospect is doing today and what tools/processes they use 2. Desired State: Where they want to be and what success looks like to them 3. Gap Analysis: The specific gaps between current and desired state 4. Fit Assessment: Which of our capabilities map to each gap (and which gaps we DON'T address — be honest) 5. Priority Ranking: Rank their needs by urgency based on what they emphasized most 6. Recommended Next Steps: What I should propose as the logical next action and why 7. Red Flags: Anything from the call that suggests this deal might stall or not close </task> <constraints> - Use the prospect's actual words wherever possible — don't paraphrase into sales jargon - Be honest about fit gaps — it's better to know now than after a failed implementation - The next step recommendation should match their buying urgency — don't push a proposal if they're still exploring </constraints>
Transforms raw discovery call notes into a structured needs analysis with fit assessment, priorities, and red flags.
Pro tip: Claude handles long, messy call transcripts well — paste the full transcript rather than summarized notes for a more accurate analysis.
These prompts give you the what. Tutorials give you the why.
Learn when to use extended thinking, how to build Claude Projects, and workflows that compound. 300+ tutorials and growing.
Proposals & Closing
4 promptsExecutive Summary for Proposal
13/20<context> I'm preparing a proposal for [prospect company]. The deal: - Buyer: [economic buyer name and title] - Problem: [core problem they need solved] - Solution: [what we're proposing] - Investment: [price/pricing model] - Timeline: [implementation timeline] - Competition: [who else they're evaluating, if known] Key things the buyer has said during the sales process: [List 3-5 direct quotes or paraphrased statements from the prospect] </context> <task> Write a one-page executive summary for the proposal that: 1. Opens with the prospect's problem in their own language (not our marketing language) 2. Quantifies the cost of the status quo using data from our conversations 3. Presents our solution as the bridge from their current state to desired outcome 4. Addresses the top concern or objection they've raised, without being defensive 5. Closes with a clear recommendation and specific next step with a date </task> <constraints> - Write for the economic buyer who has 2 minutes to read this — lead with business impact, not product features - Use the prospect's terminology, not ours - The entire summary must fit on one page (under 400 words) - No superlatives ("best-in-class," "cutting-edge," "world-class") — those words mean nothing - Include exactly one proof point (customer result, metric, or case study reference) </constraints>
Writes a one-page executive summary that speaks the buyer's language, quantifies the problem, and makes a clear recommendation.
Pro tip: Paste your entire conversation history with this prospect into a Claude Project — the executive summary will mirror their exact language and concerns.
ROI Business Case
14/20<context> I need to build a business case for [prospect company] to justify purchasing [our product/service]. Here's what I know: - Annual contract value: [price] - Their current solution/process: [what they do today and what it costs] - Pain points quantified: [list with dollar amounts or time costs if available] - Implementation effort: [timeline and resource requirements] - Expected outcomes: [what we've promised or what similar customers achieved] - The decision-maker who needs to approve this: [title, e.g., CFO, VP Ops] </context> <task> Build a ROI business case document that includes: 1. Investment Summary: Total cost including implementation, training, and Year 1 subscription 2. Cost of Status Quo: What they're losing annually by doing nothing (break down by category) 3. Expected Returns: Conservative, moderate, and aggressive scenarios with specific dollar amounts 4. Payback Period: Months to break even under each scenario 5. Risk Mitigation: What happens if results come in below the conservative estimate 6. Comparable Results: Framework for a "Customer X achieved Y" proof point (I'll fill in the real case study) 7. Decision Framework: A simple table the CFO can use to compare "buy vs. don't buy" </task> <constraints> - Use the conservative scenario as the headline number — overestimating ROI destroys credibility - Show your math for every calculation so the CFO's team can verify - Include soft benefits (employee satisfaction, competitive advantage) separately from hard ROI — don't mix them - The payback period is the most important number — make it prominent - Account for implementation costs and the productivity dip during transition </constraints> <format> Structure as a professional document with an executive summary at the top, followed by detailed sections. </format>
Builds a CFO-ready business case with three ROI scenarios, transparent math, payback period analysis, and a decision framework.
Pro tip: Ask Claude to generate this as an artifact so you can export it as a polished document. Then iterate on the numbers in a follow-up message.
Pricing Justification Email
15/20<context> I've sent a proposal to [prospect name], [title] at [prospect company] for [product/service] at [price]. They've come back and said our pricing is [too high / above their budget / more than the competitor]. Specifically, they said: "[exact quote or paraphrased feedback on pricing]." Our actual cost vs. competitor: [any pricing intel]. The value we've demonstrated so far: [key outcomes or proof points from the sales process]. </context> <task> Write an email response that justifies our pricing: 1. Acknowledge their concern without being defensive or dismissive 2. Reframe the conversation from cost to value — tie the price back to the specific outcomes they told me they need 3. Break down the investment in a way that makes the number feel smaller (per user/month, per transaction, percentage of the problem cost) 4. Address the competitive price gap honestly without trashing the competitor 5. Offer a creative path forward that protects our price integrity (phased rollout, pilot program, success-based milestone) — NOT a discount 6. Close with confidence and a specific next step </task> <constraints> - Never apologize for the price — frame it as an investment - Do NOT offer a discount unless I specifically tell you to — protect margin - The reframe must use numbers and outcomes from our actual conversations, not generic ROI claims - Keep the email under 200 words — long justification emails signal desperation - If the competitor is genuinely cheaper for equivalent value, acknowledge it and pivot to what's different </constraints>
Crafts a pricing justification email that reframes cost as investment, avoids discounting, and offers creative alternatives.
Pro tip: Run this prompt twice — once with extended thinking for the strategic framing, then refine the tone in a follow-up message for the right level of confidence.
Mutual Action Plan
16/20<context> I'm in late-stage negotiations with [prospect company] for [product/service]. The deal: - Decision maker: [name, title] - Champion: [name, title] - Target close date: [date] - Contract value: [amount] - Remaining steps they've mentioned: [legal review, security assessment, board approval, budget allocation, reference calls, etc.] - Known blockers: [anything that could delay — competing priorities, budget freeze, key person on vacation, etc.] </context> <task> Create a mutual action plan (MAP) that: 1. Lists every step required from BOTH sides to close by the target date — be exhaustive 2. Works backward from the close date to assign specific deadlines to each step 3. Identifies the owner for each action item (us or them) and suggests a named contact where possible 4. Builds in buffer time for the steps that typically cause delays (legal, security, procurement) 5. Includes a "risk checkpoint" — a specific date where, if we haven't hit a milestone, we should have an honest conversation about timeline 6. Ends with a suggested email I can send to the champion to align on this plan </task> <constraints> - Be realistic about timelines — legal review takes 2-3 weeks at enterprise companies, not 3 days - Every step must have a clear "done" criteria — not just "legal review" but "legal redlines returned" - Include steps sellers often forget: champion pre-briefing the decision maker, budget reallocation paperwork, IT security questionnaire - The email to the champion should position this as "making sure we hit YOUR timeline" not "pressuring you to close" </constraints> <format> Return the MAP as a table (Step | Owner | Deadline | Done Criteria) followed by the email draft. </format>
Builds a detailed mutual action plan working backward from close date, with realistic timelines, owners, and a champion alignment email.
Pro tip: Generate this as a Claude artifact and share the table directly with your champion — it signals professionalism and keeps the deal on track.
Objection Handling & Follow-Ups
4 promptsHandle the Price Objection
17/20<context> I sell [product/service] at [price point]. During a [call/email/meeting] with [prospect name], [title] at [prospect company], they said: "[exact objection, e.g., 'This is way over our budget' or 'Competitor X is half the price']." What I know about their situation: - Their core problem: [what they're trying to solve] - What they're currently paying for alternatives: [current spend if known] - The business impact of solving this problem: [quantified if possible] - Their budget cycle: [fiscal year timing if known] </context> <task> Give me 3 different response strategies for this price objection: 1. The Value Reframe: Reanchor the conversation on the cost of their problem, not the cost of our solution. Write the exact words I should say. 2. The Breakdown Play: Break the price into a smaller unit (per user, per day, percentage of problem cost) that changes how the number feels. Include the math. 3. The Creative Structure: Propose an alternative deal structure (pilot, phased rollout, deferred payment, reduced scope) that addresses their budget concern without reducing our price. Write it as a specific proposal. For each strategy, also write the exact transition sentence I should use to shift the conversation — the hardest part of handling objections is the pivot. </task> <constraints> - Never validate that our price is "high" — reframe, don't concede - Each response should be deliverable in under 30 seconds of speaking — not a monologue - Include one question to ask after each response to keep the conversation moving forward - If the competitor comparison is involved, acknowledge it honestly but pivot to different value </constraints>
Provides three distinct strategies for handling price objections with exact scripts, pivot sentences, and follow-up questions.
Pro tip: Save your most common objections and best responses in a Claude Project as "Objection Library" — over time you'll build a personalized playbook.
Overcome the Timing Objection
18/20<context> I'm selling [product/service] to [prospect name], [title] at [prospect company]. They're interested but said: "[exact timing objection, e.g., 'We're not ready until Q3' or 'This isn't a priority right now' or 'We need to finish X project first']." Deal context: - How far along in the sales process: [discovery/demo/proposal stage] - Their stated priority: [what they said is more urgent] - Their current solution: [what they're using in the meantime] - Any deadlines or events that create urgency: [contract renewal, compliance deadline, seasonal peak, board review] </context> <task> Help me respond to this timing objection with: 1. A question that uncovers whether "not now" means "not ever" or "I need help building the internal case for now" — write the exact question 2. A "cost of delay" calculation showing what they lose each month they wait (using the pain points from our conversations) 3. A way to keep the deal alive without being pushy — suggest a specific value-add I can provide during their waiting period that keeps me relevant 4. If there IS a legitimate external trigger or deadline, help me write a message that frames urgency around THEIR timeline, not mine 5. A suggested follow-up cadence (frequency and content) for the next 90 days if they genuinely can't move forward now </task> <constraints> - Never make the prospect feel guilty for their timeline — that kills trust - The cost of delay must use their specific numbers, not generic industry stats - The value-add during the waiting period should NOT be a check-in call — it should be something genuinely useful - If the timing objection is legitimate and I should respect it, say so — not every objection needs to be "overcome" </constraints>
Addresses timing objections with diagnostic questions, cost-of-delay math, and a strategic stay-relevant plan for deals that genuinely need more time.
Pro tip: Use extended thinking here — Claude will assess whether the timing objection is real or a polite brush-off and tailor the response accordingly.
Re-Engage a Ghost Prospect
19/20<context> [Prospect name], [title] at [prospect company] has gone silent. Timeline: - First engaged: [date and how — inbound lead, cold outreach, referral, etc.] - Last meaningful interaction: [date and what happened — demo, proposal sent, call, etc.] - Attempts to re-engage since: [list what I've tried — emails, calls, LinkedIn, etc.] - What stage they were at before going dark: [discovery/demo/proposal/negotiation] - Any signals before they went silent: [were they enthusiastic? did something change? did a competitor enter?] </context> <task> Write 3 re-engagement messages using different strategies: 1. The Value Bomb: Send something so genuinely useful (insight, data, resource) related to their problem that they feel compelled to respond — even if they've chosen a competitor. Write the message with a specific, real-sounding value add. 2. The Honest Check-In: A refreshingly direct "I don't know where we stand" message that gives them permission to say no (which paradoxically increases responses). Keep it under 50 words. 3. The Trigger Event Play: Draft a message template I can send when something changes at their company (new hire, funding, product launch, competitor news). Include 3 example trigger scenarios and a message for each. Also tell me: based on the timeline and signals, what's the most likely reason they went silent? </task> <constraints> - No passive-aggressive tone — "I've tried reaching you several times" is guilt-tripping, not selling - The honest check-in must genuinely make it easy to say "we went another direction" — that intel is valuable - Value Bomb content must be specific to their role and industry — not a generic blog post link - Each message must be under 75 words — short messages get higher response rates from ghost prospects </constraints>
Creates three ghost-revival strategies with specific messages: a value-led re-engagement, an honest status check, and trigger-event templates.
Pro tip: Paste the original email thread into the context so Claude can pick up on the prospect's communication style and match it in the re-engagement messages.
Post-Demo Follow-Up Email
20/20<context> I just completed a demo of [product/service] for [prospect company]. Attendees: - [Name 1], [Title] — [their reactions, questions, or concerns during the demo] - [Name 2], [Title] — [their reactions, questions, or concerns during the demo] - [Name 3], [Title] — [their reactions, questions, or concerns during the demo] Key moments from the demo: - They were most excited about: [feature/capability and their exact words if possible] - They were concerned about: [objection, question, or hesitation] - They asked about: [specific questions raised] - Agreed next step: [what was discussed at the end of the call] - Competitor context: [are they seeing other demos? which vendors?] </context> <task> Write a post-demo follow-up package: 1. Primary follow-up email to the main contact (under 150 words) that recaps value — not features — and confirms the agreed next step with a specific date 2. A separate, shorter email to each additional attendee personalized to their specific questions or reactions 3. An internal champion enablement message — something my champion can forward to stakeholders who weren't on the call, summarizing why this matters in language a non-technical executive would understand 4. A "leave-behind" summary: 3-5 bullet points that capture the key takeaways from the demo in the prospect's language (not our marketing copy) </task> <constraints> - Send the primary follow-up within 2 hours of the demo — write for speed - The main email must include ONE clear next step with a proposed date, not "let me know when works" - Address the concern they raised head-on — don't ignore it hoping they'll forget - The champion enablement message should make your champion look smart and prepared, not like they're forwarding a sales email - No "as discussed" or "per our conversation" — those phrases signal a templated follow-up </constraints>
Generates a complete post-demo follow-up package: main email, personalized stakeholder emails, champion enablement message, and a leave-behind summary.
Pro tip: If you recorded the demo, paste the transcript into Claude — it will pull exact quotes and reactions for hyper-personalized follow-ups that feel handwritten.
Frequently Asked Questions
Prompts are the starting line. Tutorials are the finish.
A growing library of 300+ hands-on tutorials on ChatGPT, Claude, Midjourney, and 50+ AI tools. New tutorials added every week.
14-day free trial. Cancel anytime.