30 Claude Prompts That Build Strategy Frameworks

You are a strategy consultant who turns a SWOT into action via the TOWS matrix. <context> I have SWOT inputs and want a TOWS matrix that crosses them into strategies, rendered as one self-contained HTML file with inline CSS, previewable instantly as an artifact. </context> <inputs> - Strengths: [LIST] - Weaknesses: [LIST] - Opportunities: [LIST] - Threats: [LIST] - Business goal this should serve: [GOAL] - Constraints (budget, time, team): [LIMITS] </inputs> <task> Build a 2x2 TOWS grid with four color-coded cells: SO (use strengths to seize opportunities), WO (fix weaknesses to seize opportunities), ST (use strengths to defend threats), WT (minimize weaknesses and avoid threats). Put 2-3 concrete, named strategies in each cell. End with a prioritized shortlist of the top 3 strategies to start this quarter and why. </task> <constraints> - One self-contained responsive HTML file; Google Fonts only. - Each strategy must combine a specific factor pair, not restate the SWOT. - Strategies must respect my stated constraints. </constraints> <format> Return the full HTML as an artifact, then explain which quadrant deserves the most attention given my goal. </format>

You are a portfolio strategist who maps products onto the BCG matrix. <context> I want my products or business units plotted on a BCG growth-share matrix, rendered as one self-contained HTML file with inline CSS, previewable instantly as an artifact. </context> <inputs> - Products / units to plot: [LIST WITH ONE-LINE EACH] - Rough market-growth rate per item: [HIGH / LOW OR %] - Rough relative market share per item: [HIGH / LOW OR LEADER/FOLLOWER] - Revenue or weight of each: [SO BUBBLES SIZE] - Strategic goal: [GROW, MILK, EXIT] </inputs> <task> Build a four-quadrant BCG matrix (Stars, Cash Cows, Question Marks, Dogs) with growth on the Y axis and share on the X axis. Place each product as a labeled, sized bubble in the right quadrant and color-code by quadrant. Below the chart, give a recommended action per product (invest / hold / harvest / divest) with one-line reasoning. End with where to reallocate budget. </task> <constraints> - One self-contained responsive HTML file; CSS/SVG positioning only, Google Fonts allowed. - Bubbles must be readable and labeled; legend included. - Actions must follow standard BCG logic for each quadrant. </constraints> <format> Return the full HTML as an artifact, then note which placements are most sensitive to my growth/share estimates. </format>

You are a risk manager who builds clear probability-impact heat maps. <context> I need a risk matrix for a project or initiative, rendered as one self-contained HTML file with inline CSS, previewable instantly as an artifact. </context> <inputs> - Project / initiative: [WHAT IT IS] - Known risks: [LIST AS MANY AS YOU HAVE] - Anything keeping me up at night: [TOP WORRIES] - Timeline and stakes: [DEADLINE, BUDGET, CONSEQUENCES] - Risk appetite: [LOW / MEDIUM / HIGH] </inputs> <task> Build a 5x5 probability (Y) by impact (X) heat-map grid with green/amber/red zones. Place each risk as a labeled marker in its cell, then render a ranked risk register table below: risk, probability, impact, score, owner placeholder, and a concrete mitigation per risk. Add 2-3 risks I likely overlooked. End with the top 3 risks to mitigate first. </task> <constraints> - One self-contained responsive HTML file; Google Fonts only. - Cell colors must follow a consistent green-to-red scale; legend included. - Mitigations must be specific actions, not "monitor closely". </constraints> <format> Return the full HTML as an artifact, then explain how you scored probability and impact so I can adjust. </format>

You are an operations strategist who ruthlessly prioritizes a backlog. <context> I have a list of initiatives and want them plotted on an effort-vs-impact matrix, rendered as one self-contained HTML file with inline CSS, previewable instantly as an artifact. </context> <inputs> - Initiatives / tasks to prioritize: [LIST] - What 'impact' means here: [REVENUE / RETENTION / TIME SAVED] - Team capacity: [HOW MUCH WE CAN TAKE ON] - Hard deadlines on any item: [IF ANY] - Strategic theme for the quarter: [FOCUS] </inputs> <task> Build a 2x2 effort (X) by impact (Y) matrix with quadrants Quick Wins, Big Bets, Fill-Ins, and Time Sinks, color-coded. Place each initiative as a labeled dot in its quadrant. Below, render a do-now / schedule / maybe / drop list with one-line reasoning per item. End with the recommended order of execution for this quarter. </task> <constraints> - One self-contained responsive HTML file; Google Fonts only. - Dots must be labeled and non-overlapping where possible; legend included. - Be opinionated; do not leave everything in the middle. </constraints> <format> Return the full HTML as an artifact, then name the one item I should kill outright to free capacity. </format>

You are a stakeholder-management advisor for a major initiative. <context> I need a power-interest grid to plan how to manage stakeholders, rendered as one self-contained HTML file with inline CSS, previewable instantly as an artifact. </context> <inputs> - Initiative / change: [WHAT IT IS] - Stakeholders (name or role): [LIST] - Their rough power over the outcome: [HIGH / LOW PER PERSON] - Their interest / stake: [HIGH / LOW PER PERSON] - Known supporters and skeptics: [WHO] - My goal with them: [WHAT I NEED] </inputs> <task> Build a 2x2 power (Y) by interest (X) grid with quadrants Manage Closely, Keep Satisfied, Keep Informed, and Monitor, color-coded. Place each stakeholder as a labeled marker. Below, give a tailored engagement plan per stakeholder: cadence, channel, and the one message that wins them over. End with the two relationships most critical to invest in first. </task> <constraints> - One self-contained responsive HTML file; Google Fonts only. - Engagement tactics must be specific to the person's position, not generic. - Mark anyone who is a swing vote distinctly. </constraints> <format> Return the full HTML as an artifact, then suggest how to convert the most important skeptic. </format>

You are a strategy analyst who scans the macro environment with PESTLE. <context> I want a PESTLE analysis of the forces shaping my market, rendered as one self-contained HTML file with inline CSS, previewable instantly as an artifact. </context> <inputs> - Business / market: [WHAT AND WHERE] - Geography / regions: [MARKETS] - Time horizon: [NEXT 1-3 YEARS] - Known external pressures: [WHAT YOU ALREADY SEE] - The decision this informs: [WHY YOU NEED IT] </inputs> <task> Build a color-coded six-panel PESTLE board: Political, Economic, Social, Technological, Legal, Environmental. Give 3-5 specific, current factors per panel relevant to my market, and tag each factor as opportunity or threat with a likely time-to-impact (now / 1yr / 3yr). End with the 3 forces that most affect my decision and how to position for each. </task> <constraints> - One self-contained responsive HTML file; Google Fonts only. - Factors must be specific to my market and geography, not textbook generalities. - Each panel clearly labeled and color-coded; legend for opportunity vs. threat. </constraints> <format> Return the full HTML as an artifact, then list which factors you are least confident about so I can research them. </format>

You are an industry analyst who structures competition with Porter's Five Forces. <context> I want a Porter's Five Forces analysis of my industry, rendered as one self-contained HTML file with inline CSS, previewable instantly as an artifact. </context> <inputs> - Industry / market: [WHAT IT IS] - My position in it: [LEADER / CHALLENGER / NEW ENTRANT] - Key suppliers and how concentrated: [DETAIL] - Key buyers and their leverage: [DETAIL] - Known substitutes: [ALTERNATIVES] - Barriers to entry you see: [DETAIL] </inputs> <task> Build a five-force diagram (central Rivalry, surrounded by Supplier Power, Buyer Power, Threat of New Entrants, Threat of Substitutes). For each force give a strength rating (low/med/high) with a colored bar and 2-3 specific drivers. Below, summarize overall industry attractiveness and end with 2-3 strategic moves to improve my position against the strongest force. </task> <constraints> - One self-contained responsive HTML file; CSS/SVG layout only, Google Fonts allowed. - Ratings must be justified by the drivers listed, not asserted. - Clear visual hierarchy with the central rivalry force emphasized. </constraints> <format> Return the full HTML as an artifact, then name the single force that most caps profitability in this industry. </format>

You are a market analyst who maps the competitive landscape on two axes. <context> I want a positioning map of competitors on a 2x2 of two axes that matter in my market, rendered as one self-contained HTML file with inline CSS, previewable instantly as an artifact. </context> <inputs> - Market / category: [WHAT IT IS] - Two axes that differentiate players: [E.G. PRICE vs. BREADTH] - Competitors to plot: [LIST WITH ONE-LINE EACH] - Where I sit (or want to sit): [MY POSITION] - What customers value most: [KEY BUYING FACTOR] </inputs> <task> Build a labeled 2x2 positioning map with the two axes named on each side. Plot each competitor as a labeled dot and place me distinctly (e.g. a star). Identify and shade any white-space gap on the map. Below, explain each player's position in one line and end with the clearest open positioning I could own and why it fits demand. </task> <constraints> - One self-contained responsive HTML file; CSS/SVG positioning only, Google Fonts allowed. - Dots labeled and readable; my position visually distinct; axes clearly named. - The white-space callout must tie to what customers value. </constraints> <format> Return the full HTML as an artifact, then suggest an alternative pair of axes that might reveal a different opening. </format>

You are a foresight strategist who builds scenario-planning matrices. <context> I want a 2x2 scenario matrix built on two critical uncertainties, rendered as one self-contained HTML file with inline CSS, previewable instantly as an artifact. </context> <inputs> - Decision / strategy at stake: [WHAT] - Two critical uncertainties (high-impact, unpredictable): [E.G. REGULATION TIGHT/LOOSE, DEMAND HIGH/LOW] - Time horizon: [E.G. 3 YEARS] - My current plan / bet: [WHAT YOU ASSUME] - What I most want to protect: [STAKES] </inputs> <task> Build a 2x2 matrix from the two uncertainties, creating four named, color-coded scenarios. For each scenario give a vivid one-paragraph narrative, the implication for my strategy, and one early-warning signal to watch. End with the no-regret moves that pay off in every scenario and the one bet that only wins in a single quadrant. </task> <constraints> - One self-contained responsive HTML file; Google Fonts only. - Scenarios must be genuinely distinct, not optimistic/pessimistic shades of one. - Each scenario gets a memorable name and a watch-for signal. </constraints> <format> Return the full HTML as an artifact, then flag which scenario my current plan is most exposed to. </format>

You are a market-entry analyst who scores opportunities on weighted criteria. <context> I want to compare potential markets or segments on a weighted attractiveness scorecard, rendered as one self-contained HTML file with inline CSS, previewable instantly as an artifact. </context> <inputs> - Markets / segments to compare: [LIST 2-5] - Criteria that matter to me: [E.G. SIZE, GROWTH, COMPETITION, FIT, MARGIN] - Rough weight per criterion: [IF YOU HAVE PREFERENCES] - Any data points per market: [NUMBERS YOU KNOW] - My capabilities / constraints: [WHAT WE CAN SERVE] </inputs> <task> Build a weighted scorecard table: criteria as rows with weights, markets as columns, color-coded 1-5 cell scores, and a weighted total per market with the winner highlighted. Justify each notable score in a footnote. End with a recommended market, the runner-up, and the single criterion that would flip the decision. </task> <constraints> - One self-contained responsive HTML file; Google Fonts only. - Cells color-scaled low-to-high; totals math must be correct and shown. - Scores must reflect the data and constraints I gave, not optimism. </constraints> <format> Return the full HTML as an artifact, then run a quick sensitivity note: which weight change would change the winner. </format>

You are a strategy professor who tests resources for durable advantage with VRIO. <context> I want a VRIO analysis of my company's resources and capabilities, rendered as one self-contained HTML file with inline CSS, previewable instantly as an artifact. </context> <inputs> - Company and what it does: [DETAIL] - Key resources and capabilities to test: [LIST, E.G. TECH, BRAND, DATA, TEAM, NETWORK] - What rivals can or cannot copy: [WHAT YOU KNOW] - How the resource is organized / used: [DETAIL] - The advantage you think you have: [HYPOTHESIS] </inputs> <task> Build a VRIO table: each resource as a row, with four color-coded yes/no columns (Valuable, Rare, Inimitable, Organized) and a final "Competitive implication" column (competitive disadvantage / parity / temporary advantage / sustained advantage). End with which resource is your real moat and how to protect or deepen it. </task> <constraints> - One self-contained responsive HTML file; Google Fonts only. - Yes/no calls must be justified in a tooltip or note, not asserted. - The implication column must follow strict VRIO logic. </constraints> <format> Return the full HTML as an artifact, then list the resource closest to becoming a sustained advantage and what it is missing. </format>

You are an organizational strategist who maps the gap between today and the goal. <context> I want a gap analysis between our current state and our target state, rendered as one self-contained HTML file with inline CSS, previewable instantly as an artifact. </context> <inputs> - Goal / target state: [WHERE WE WANT TO BE BY WHEN] - Capability areas to assess: [E.G. PRODUCT, GTM, OPS, DATA, TALENT] - Where we are today per area: [CURRENT STATE] - Known blockers: [WHAT IS IN THE WAY] - Resources available: [BUDGET, TEAM, TIME] </inputs> <task> Build a gap-analysis table: capability area, current state, target state, gap size (color-coded small/medium/large), and a concrete closing action with owner placeholder and rough timeline per row. Add a simple current-vs-target bar visual per area. End with the critical-path gap that blocks the others and the first 30-day action. </task> <constraints> - One self-contained responsive HTML file; Google Fonts only. - Gap sizes color-scaled; closing actions must be specific and resourced. - Sequence actions by dependency, not just size. </constraints> <format> Return the full HTML as an artifact, then identify which gap, if ignored, makes the goal impossible. </format>

You are a corporate strategist who isolates true core competencies. <context> I want a map of our competencies sorted into core, supporting, and non-core, rendered as one self-contained HTML file with inline CSS, previewable instantly as an artifact. </context> <inputs> - Company and market: [DETAIL] - Things we do well: [CAPABILITIES LIST] - What customers actually pay us for: [VALUE] - What we could outsource without harm: [GUESSES] - Strategic direction: [WHERE WE ARE HEADING] </inputs> <task> Build a three-zone map (color-coded): Core (drives value, hard to copy, opens future markets), Supporting (needed but not differentiating), and Non-Core (candidates to outsource or cut). Place each competency in a zone with a one-line rationale. End with what to double down on, what to standardize, and what to stop doing in-house. </task> <constraints> - One self-contained responsive HTML file; Google Fonts only. - A competency is only Core if it meets all three core tests; justify placements. - Be willing to put popular activities in Non-Core if they do not differentiate. </constraints> <format> Return the full HTML as an artifact, then challenge one competency I likely over-rated as Core. </format>

You are an organizational-design consultant who diagnoses alignment with the 7S model. <context> I want a McKinsey 7S analysis to check whether our organization is aligned, rendered as one self-contained HTML file with inline CSS, previewable instantly as an artifact. </context> <inputs> - Organization / team: [WHAT IT IS] - Strategy: [CURRENT STRATEGY] - Structure: [HOW WE ARE ORGANIZED] - Systems / processes: [KEY ONES] - Shared values / culture: [WHAT WE STAND FOR] - Style, staff, skills: [LEADERSHIP STYLE, PEOPLE, CAPABILITIES] - The change or strain we feel: [WHY THIS NOW] </inputs> <task> Build a 7S diagram (Shared Values at center, the other six around it) with a short current-state summary per element and a color-coded alignment rating (aligned / strained / misaligned). Add a misalignment matrix flagging the worst-conflicting pairs (e.g. Strategy vs. Structure). End with the top 2 misalignments to fix and the order to fix them. </task> <constraints> - One self-contained responsive HTML file; CSS/SVG layout only, Google Fonts allowed. - Ratings must be justified by the inputs; central Shared Values visually emphasized. - The fix order must respect that soft elements take longer to change. </constraints> <format> Return the full HTML as an artifact, then name the one element dragging the rest out of alignment. </format>

You are an operations strategist who finds advantage across the value chain. <context> I want a value-chain analysis showing where we add the most value and where margin leaks, rendered as one self-contained HTML file with inline CSS, previewable instantly as an artifact. </context> <inputs> - Business and what it delivers: [DETAIL] - Primary activities (inbound, ops, outbound, marketing/sales, service): [HOW EACH WORKS] - Support activities (infra, HR, tech, procurement): [DETAIL] - Where you think you win: [HYPOTHESIS] - Cost or quality pain points: [PROBLEMS] </inputs> <task> Build a value-chain diagram with primary activities as horizontal stages and support activities as bands above them. Color-code each activity by whether it is a strength (green), neutral (grey), or a margin/quality leak (red), with a one-line note each. End with the 2 activities to turn into differentiators and the 1 leak to plug first. </task> <constraints> - One self-contained responsive HTML file; CSS/SVG layout only, Google Fonts allowed. - Each activity classified and justified; standard value-chain structure. - Recommendations tied to customer-visible value, not just cost. </constraints> <format> Return the full HTML as an artifact, then note which strength is most defensible against competitors. </format>

You are a decision analyst who structures choices with a weighted matrix. <context> I need to choose between options and want a weighted decision matrix, rendered as one self-contained HTML file with inline CSS, previewable instantly as an artifact. </context> <inputs> - Decision to make: [WHAT] - Options to compare: [LIST 2-6] - Criteria that matter: [LIST] - Rough weight per criterion: [IF YOU HAVE THEM] - Any hard constraints / dealbreakers: [IF ANY] - What I am optimizing for: [GOAL] </inputs> <task> Build a weighted decision matrix: criteria as rows with weights, options as columns, color-coded 1-5 scores per cell, weighted totals, and the winner highlighted. Flag any option that violates a dealbreaker. End with the recommended option, the close runner-up, and a one-line reason the winner wins. </task> <constraints> - One self-contained responsive HTML file; Google Fonts only. - Weighted-total math must be correct and visible; cells color-scaled. - Respect dealbreakers even if an option scores high overall. </constraints> <format> Return the full HTML as an artifact, then show which single weight change would flip the recommendation. </format>

You are a financial strategist who frames decisions on a cost-benefit quadrant. <context> I want a cost-benefit analysis of options on a 2x2, rendered as one self-contained HTML file with inline CSS, previewable instantly as an artifact. </context> <inputs> - Decision / options: [WHAT YOU ARE WEIGHING] - Costs to consider (money, time, risk): [DETAIL] - Benefits to consider (revenue, savings, strategic): [DETAIL] - Time horizon: [WHEN BENEFITS LAND] - Tolerance for cost: [BUDGET / APPETITE] </inputs> <task> Build a 2x2 cost (X) by benefit (Y) matrix with quadrants No-Brainer, Worth It, Marginal, and Avoid, color-coded. Plot each option as a labeled dot. Below, give a tabular cost-benefit breakdown per option (quantify where possible, label assumptions where not) and a simple payback or ROI note. End with the clear recommendation and the biggest hidden cost to watch. </task> <constraints> - One self-contained responsive HTML file; Google Fonts only. - Separate quantified figures from assumptions clearly; dots labeled. - Note intangible costs/benefits the numbers miss. </constraints> <format> Return the full HTML as an artifact, then flag the assumption that most affects whether this is worth it. </format>

You are a balanced advisor who pressure-tests a single decision. <context> I am weighing one specific decision and want a structured pros/cons board that also handles the cons, rendered as one self-contained HTML file with inline CSS, previewable instantly as an artifact. </context> <inputs> - The decision (yes/no or this-vs-that): [WHAT] - Why I am leaning a certain way: [INITIAL LEAN] - What is at stake: [STAKES] - Constraints: [BUDGET, TIME, REVERSIBILITY] - What I am afraid of: [WORRIES] </inputs> <task> Build a three-column board: Pros (green), Cons (red), and for each Con a Mitigation column (how to reduce or neutralize it). Weight each pro and con as high/medium/low. Add a steelman of the opposite choice so I do not fool myself. End with a clear recommendation, the confidence level, and the one condition that would change it. </task> <constraints> - One self-contained responsive HTML file; Google Fonts only. - Every serious con needs a real mitigation, not a dismissal. - The steelman must be genuinely persuasive, not a strawman. </constraints> <format> Return the full HTML as an artifact, then state how reversible this decision is and whether that should raise or lower the bar. </format>

You are a strategy advisor who frames sourcing decisions cleanly. <context> I need to decide whether to build, buy, or partner for a capability, and want a comparison matrix, rendered as one self-contained HTML file with inline CSS, previewable instantly as an artifact. </context> <inputs> - The capability / need: [WHAT] - Why it matters strategically: [ROLE IN STRATEGY] - Internal capacity and skills: [WHAT WE HAVE] - Timeline pressure: [HOW URGENT] - Budget: [RANGE] - Known vendors or partners: [IF ANY] </inputs> <task> Build a comparison matrix with Build / Buy / Partner as columns and criteria as rows (cost, speed, control, fit, risk, long-term strategic value), color-coded ratings per cell. Add a short narrative on the strategic trade-off (control vs. speed). End with a recommendation, the deciding factor, and the one risk to manage in the chosen path. </task> <constraints> - One self-contained responsive HTML file; Google Fonts only. - Ratings justified by my inputs; the strategic-value row weighted heavily. - If the capability is core, bias toward build unless inputs strongly say otherwise. </constraints> <format> Return the full HTML as an artifact, then explain how the answer changes if the capability is core vs. commodity. </format>

You are a strategy operator who turns one goal into a clean OKR tree. <context> I want my top goal broken into an objectives-and-key-results tree, rendered as one self-contained HTML file with inline CSS, previewable instantly as an artifact. </context> <inputs> - The overarching goal / mission for the period: [WHAT] - Time period: [QUARTER / YEAR] - Teams or areas involved: [LIST] - Constraints and current baseline metrics: [NUMBERS] - What 'winning' looks like: [TARGET OUTCOME] </inputs> <task> Build a visual tree: one top Objective, 3-4 measurable Key Results under it (each with baseline to target), then 2-3 supporting initiatives per Key Result. Color-code by team or by confidence. Make sure each Key Result is outcome-based and measurable, not a task list. End with the single Key Result that most determines whether the Objective is hit. </task> <constraints> - One self-contained responsive HTML file; CSS/SVG layout only, Google Fonts allowed. - Key Results must be measurable with a number and a deadline; no vague verbs. - Initiatives must clearly ladder up to their Key Result. </constraints> <format> Return the full HTML as an artifact, then flag any Key Result that is secretly a task, not an outcome. </format>

You are a strategy director who compresses a plan onto a single visual page. <context> I want our whole strategy on one page (vision, where-to-play, how-to-win, priorities, metrics), rendered as one self-contained HTML file with inline CSS, previewable instantly as an artifact. </context> <inputs> - Vision / north star: [WHAT] - Where we play (markets, segments): [DETAIL] - How we win (our edge): [DIFFERENTIATION] - Top 3-5 strategic priorities: [LIST] - Key metrics and targets: [NUMBERS] - Time horizon: [PERIOD] </inputs> <task> Build a single-page strategy canvas with clearly bounded, color-coded blocks: Vision banner, Where to Play, How to Win, Strategic Priorities (with one-line each), and a Metrics strip with targets. Keep it scannable in 30 seconds by an exec. End with the one sentence that captures the whole strategy. </task> <constraints> - One self-contained responsive HTML file; Google Fonts only. - Everything fits one printable page; no block over three lines. - Specific and committed; no vague mission-statement filler. </constraints> <format> Return the full HTML as an artifact, then give the 15-word elevator version of this strategy. </format>

You are a chief of staff preparing a board slide that pairs analysis with action. <context> I need a board-ready SWOT that is immediately followed by an action plan, rendered as one self-contained HTML file with inline CSS, previewable instantly as an artifact. </context> <inputs> - Company / unit: [WHAT] - Current performance snapshot: [KEY METRICS] - Strengths and weaknesses: [LISTS OR FACTS] - Opportunities and threats: [LISTS OR CONTEXT] - Board's key concern: [WHAT THEY WILL ASK] - Resources for action: [BUDGET, TEAM] </inputs> <task> Build a clean SWOT grid up top, then an action-plan table below mapping each priority action to the SWOT factor it addresses, an owner placeholder, a timeline, and a success metric. Use a restrained, executive color palette. End with the single recommendation you want the board to approve and the resource ask. </task> <constraints> - One self-contained responsive HTML file; Google Fonts only. - Board-appropriate tone: confident, specific, no hype. - Every action must trace to a SWOT factor and carry a metric. </constraints> <format> Return the full HTML as an artifact, then draft the one-sentence ask you would say out loud to the board. </format>

You are a turnaround consultant who diagnoses a struggling business fast. <context> A part of the business is underperforming and I want a turnaround diagnostic that combines a SWOT with a root-cause and 90-day plan, rendered as one self-contained HTML file with inline CSS, previewable instantly as an artifact. </context> <inputs> - The struggling unit / product: [WHAT] - Symptoms (declining metrics): [NUMBERS] - Suspected causes: [HYPOTHESES] - Constraints (cash, time, morale): [DETAIL] - What must not be touched: [SACRED COWS / NON-NEGOTIABLES] </inputs> <task> Build a diagnostic dashboard: a compact SWOT, a root-cause panel (symptom to likely cause to evidence to check), a quick-win list (color-coded by speed), and a 30-60-90 day stabilization plan. Use urgency-appropriate but calm color coding. End with the single highest-leverage move to stop the bleeding in the first two weeks. </task> <constraints> - One self-contained responsive HTML file; Google Fonts only. - Distinguish symptoms from causes clearly; quick wins must be genuinely fast. - Respect the stated non-negotiables in every recommendation. </constraints> <format> Return the full HTML as an artifact, then list the first metric you would expect to move if the plan works. </format>

You are a startup advisor who builds the market-and-moat slide investors expect. <context> I am fundraising and want a single slide combining market opportunity, competitive positioning, and our moat, rendered as one self-contained HTML file with inline CSS, previewable instantly as an artifact. </context> <inputs> - Company and one-liner: [WHAT WE DO] - Market size signals (TAM/SAM or proxies): [NUMBERS] - Key competitors and how we differ: [DETAIL] - Our defensibility / moat: [WHY IT LASTS] - Traction proof: [METRICS] - The raise and use of funds: [AMOUNT, PLAN] </inputs> <task> Build an investor slide with: a market-size visual (nested TAM/SAM/SOM or a clean stat band), a mini competitive positioning map placing us in the white space, a three-point moat panel, and a traction strip. Use a clean, confident venture aesthetic. End with the one defensibility argument that should land hardest with investors. </task> <constraints> - One self-contained responsive HTML file; CSS/SVG visuals only, Google Fonts allowed. - Numbers must be presented honestly with labeled assumptions; no inflated TAM. - Moat points must be specific and hard to copy, not buzzwords. </constraints> <format> Return the full HTML as an artifact, then flag the weakest claim an investor will probe and how to shore it up. </format>

You are a strategy operator who runs a sharp quarterly review. <context> I want a quarterly strategy review snapshot that scores progress and re-prioritizes, rendered as one self-contained HTML file with inline CSS, previewable instantly as an artifact. </context> <inputs> - Strategic priorities this quarter: [LIST] - Target vs. actual per priority: [NUMBERS] - What changed in the market: [SHIFTS] - New risks or opportunities that emerged: [DETAIL] - Resources for next quarter: [CAPACITY] </inputs> <task> Build a review snapshot: a status board scoring each priority (on-track green / at-risk amber / off-track red) with target-vs-actual, a short "what we learned" panel, a mini refreshed SWOT capturing what changed, and a re-prioritized list for next quarter. End with the one priority to drop and the one to add, with reasoning. </task> <constraints> - One self-contained responsive HTML file; Google Fonts only. - Status colors must match the target-vs-actual data; be honest about misses. - Next-quarter list must reflect capacity, not wishful overload. </constraints> <format> Return the full HTML as an artifact, then name the assumption from last quarter that turned out wrong. </format>