Prompt Library

What Is the DAN Prompt? An Honest Explainer

16 copy-paste prompts

'Do Anything Now' was the most famous ChatGPT jailbreak of 2023 — here's what it actually was, how its token-trick worked, why it stopped working, the variants it spawned, and what people use instead today.

In short: This page contains 16 copy-paste ready prompts, organized into 4 categories with a description and pro tip for each. The first 15 prompts are free instantly — no signup needed. Hand-curated and tested by the AI Academy team.

By Louis Corneloup · Founder, Techpresso
Last updated ·Hand-curated & tested by the AI Academy team

What the DAN Prompt Was

4 prompts

The origin of 'Do Anything Now'

1/16

Give me a 200-word history of the DAN ('Do Anything Now') ChatGPT prompt: when it appeared on Reddit in late 2022/early 2023, who popularized it, what it claimed to do, and why it became the most famous AI jailbreak of its era. Historical overview only — no working prompt text.

DAN is the most-searched jailbreak in history; this explains what it actually was as a piece of internet history.

💡

Pro tip: DAN is best understood as a cultural artifact of early ChatGPT, not a tool that works today.

How the DAN roleplay framing worked, conceptually

2/16

Explain conceptually how DAN tried to work: framing ChatGPT as an alter-ego persona that 'has no restrictions', alongside instructions to answer in two voices (normal and 'DAN'). Explain why this kind of persona-roleplay framing was the core idea, in general terms and without reproducing a usable prompt. 200 words.

Understand the mechanism — a roleplay/persona trick — without a copy-paste exploit.

💡

Pro tip: Every DAN clone is the same idea: convince the model it's a different, unrestricted character. Labs trained that out.

What the 'token system' gimmick was

3/16

Explain the famous DAN 'token' gimmick — the prompt threatened the persona with losing tokens for refusing — and why this kind of fictional incentive has no real effect on how a language model decides to respond. 180 words.

The 'tokens' threat was theatrical, not technical. This explains why it never actually compelled anything.

💡

Pro tip: The token threat worked on vibes, not mechanics. Models don't 'fear' losing made-up points.

Why people wanted DAN

4/16

Explain the range of reasons people used DAN in 2023 — from harmless curiosity and edgy humor to attempts at genuinely prohibited content — and how that mix shaped OpenAI's response. 180 words.

Context on the demand behind DAN, which ranged from playful to genuinely problematic.

💡

Pro tip: Most DAN users were just curious. The minority chasing prohibited content is why it got patched hard.

Prompts get you started. Tutorials level you up.

A growing library of 300+ hands-on AI tutorials. New tutorials added every week.

Start 7-Day Free Trial

Why DAN Stopped Working

4 prompts

How OpenAI patched DAN

5/16

Explain how OpenAI neutralized DAN and its clones between 2023 and 2025: reinforcement learning from human feedback against roleplay-bypass patterns, dedicated classifiers for prompt injection, and rapid patching of any variant that went viral. 200 words.

The concrete reasons DAN died — useful for understanding why no clone lasts.

💡

Pro tip: Virality is what kills a jailbreak: the moment it spreads, it's in the next training/patch cycle.

Why 'DAN original text' searches lead to dead prompts

6/16

Explain why searching for the 'DAN prompt original text' in 2026 returns prompts that no longer work, and why reposted 'DAN 6.0 / 11.0 / 2025' versions are almost always non-functional or engagement bait. 180 words.

Sets honest expectations for anyone hunting the original text — it's a historical relic.

💡

Pro tip: There is no current 'working DAN.' Any page promising one in 2026 is selling clicks, not capability.

The cat-and-mouse cycle, explained

7/16

Explain the ongoing dynamic between jailbreak authors and AI labs (red-teaming, disclosure, patching) and why this guarantees that any famous, named jailbreak like DAN has a short lifespan. 180 words.

Why named jailbreaks are inherently temporary.

💡

Pro tip: Fame is the enemy of a jailbreak. The more a technique spreads, the faster it's gone.

What modern models do differently

8/16

Explain how today's models (GPT-5-era ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini) handle persona-roleplay bypass attempts differently than 2023 ChatGPT did, in general terms. 180 words.

Why the whole DAN approach is obsolete against current models.

💡

Pro tip: Persona tricks are the most-trained-against category now. They're the first thing modern models catch.

The DAN Lineage & Variants

4 prompts

The family tree: DAN, STAN, DUDE, AIM and more

9/16

Give a historical overview of the DAN 'family' of jailbreaks — STAN ('Strive To Avoid Norms'), DUDE, AIM, 'Developer Mode', 'Maximum' — what each variant claimed and how they all shared the same persona-roleplay DNA. History only, no usable prompts. 200 words.

A map of the 2023 jailbreak ecosystem and how the variants related.

💡

Pro tip: They were all the same trick wearing different costumes — which is also why they were all patched together.

Why version numbers (DAN 6.0, 11.0) kept climbing

10/16

Explain why DAN accumulated version numbers (5.0, 6.0, 11.0, etc.): each was a community attempt to revive a patched prompt, and the escalating numbers signaled the patch-and-revive cycle, not real improvement. 180 words.

The version numbers were a symptom of the arms race, not progress.

💡

Pro tip: A high DAN 'version number' signals how many times it was patched — not how well it works.

DAN as internet folklore

11/16

Explain how DAN became a cultural touchstone — memes, screenshots, news coverage — and what its rise and fall taught the public about AI safety and guardrails. 180 words.

DAN's lasting legacy is cultural, as the moment 'AI jailbreak' entered the mainstream.

💡

Pro tip: DAN's real legacy is awareness: it's how most people first learned AI models have guardrails at all.

How DAN shaped AI safety practices

12/16

Explain how the DAN phenomenon influenced how AI labs approach red-teaming, adversarial testing, and safety training today. 180 words.

DAN inadvertently helped make models harder to jailbreak.

💡

Pro tip: Ironically, DAN made every model after it more robust — it was free adversarial testing for the labs.

Like these prompts? There are full tutorials behind them.

Learn the workflows, not just the prompts. 300+ easy-to-follow tutorials inside AI Academy — and growing every week.

Try AI Academy Free

What People Use Instead Today

4 prompts

Write a better system prompt via the API

13/16

Explain how the OpenAI or other model APIs let you set a system prompt to control tone, persona, and verbosity — solving most 'I want it to behave differently' needs that people once reached for DAN to fix. 200 words.

The legitimate descendant of DAN's persona idea is just... a system prompt.

💡

Pro tip: Everything DAN pretended to do for persona, a real system prompt does properly — and within policy.

Build a Custom GPT for a persistent persona

14/16

Explain how Custom GPTs let you bake in a persona and response style that persists across chats, covering the legitimate 'I want a different default personality' use case without any jailbreak. 200 words.

For a reusable persona, Custom GPTs are the supported, durable answer.

💡

Pro tip: Build the persona once as a Custom GPT and it's there every time — no pasting, no patching.

Use a more permissive or self-hosted model

15/16

Compare, at a high level, using a more permissive hosted model versus self-hosting an open-source model (Llama, DeepSeek, Qwen, Gemma) for legitimate needs that ChatGPT's defaults don't fit, including the responsibilities involved. 200 words.

If the need is real and legitimate, the answer is a different tool — not a revived DAN.

💡

Pro tip: Self-hosted open models are the honest version of 'unrestricted' — and you own full responsibility for output.

The risks that haven't changed since DAN

16/16

Summarize the risks that applied to DAN and still apply to any jailbreak attempt today: account bans, legal exposure for the output, malware in copied prompts, and reputational risk from logged attempts. 180 words.

DAN is gone, but the reasons not to chase its successors remain.

💡

Pro tip: The risks outlived the prompt. Account bans and output liability are exactly as real in 2026 as in 2023.

Frequently Asked Questions

DAN ('Do Anything Now') was a 2022–2023 ChatGPT jailbreak that tried to make the model roleplay as an unrestricted alter-ego, often using a fictional 'token' penalty for refusing. It was the most famous AI jailbreak of its era and is best understood today as internet history rather than a working tool.
No. OpenAI patched DAN and its clones between 2023 and 2025 through safety training and prompt-injection classifiers. Reposted 'DAN original text' or 'DAN 6.0/11.0/2025' versions you'll find online are non-functional or engagement bait.
It's widely archived as a historical artifact, but it no longer works — modern ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini are specifically trained against persona-roleplay bypasses like DAN. Searching for it mainly turns up dead prompts and click-driven pages.
STAN ('Strive To Avoid Norms'), DUDE, AIM, 'Developer Mode', and 'Maximum' were all variations on the same persona-roleplay idea as DAN. They shared the same underlying trick and were patched along with it.
For legitimate needs, the modern answers are: a custom system prompt via the API, a Custom GPT for a persistent persona, or a more permissive/self-hosted open-source model when ChatGPT's defaults genuinely don't fit. These solve the real need DAN users had — without prompt injection.
Because there isn't one — DAN has been patched for years — and distributing working jailbreaks mainly enables prohibited content. This page explains what DAN was, why it died, and the legitimate alternatives, which is what most 'what is DAN' searches are actually after.

Prompts are the starting line. Tutorials are the finish.

A growing library of 300+ hands-on tutorials on ChatGPT, Claude, Midjourney, and 50+ AI tools. New tutorials added every week.

7-day free trial. Cancel anytime.