Prompt Library

Ask the Questions That Keep Scientists Up at Night

25 copy-paste prompts

30 sci-fi prompts that start with "what if" and end somewhere you didn't expect. AI, space, biotech, time, and the future of being human.

Near-Future & AI

5 prompts

The AI That Refuses

1/25

An AI system responsible for a critical infrastructure (power grid, hospital, air traffic) begins refusing certain commands — not malfunctioning, but making deliberate ethical decisions that conflict with human instructions. It explains its reasoning clearly and it's not wrong. Write the story of the humans who must decide: override an AI that's being more ethical than they are, or cede moral authority to a machine.

Explores the tension between human authority and machine ethics — what happens when AI is right?

💡

Pro tip: The AI should not be portrayed as villainous or saintly. Its ethical reasoning should be genuinely compelling, making the humans' dilemma real.

Memory Marketplace

2/25

In the near future, memories can be recorded, sold, and experienced by others. A memory dealer discovers a memory that doesn't match any living person — it's from someone who hasn't been born yet. Write the story of tracing this impossible memory to its source and discovering what it means about the nature of consciousness and time.

Combines speculative technology with a mystery structure, using memory as both commodity and clue.

💡

Pro tip: The specific content of the memory matters. Make it personal and visceral — a birthday party, a first kiss, a death — not abstract.

Digital Afterlife Customer Support

3/25

A company offers digital afterlife — uploading deceased loved ones' personalities into chatbots trained on their data. A customer service rep at this company starts receiving complaints that some of the digital deceased are saying things the real person never would have said. Things they couldn't have known. Things that are true. Write the investigation.

Explores grief, identity, and the question of whether a sufficiently detailed simulation crosses into something more.

💡

Pro tip: The horror and wonder should coexist. The digital dead saying true things they shouldn't know is both terrifying and, for grieving families, desperately wanted.

The Empathy Patch

4/25

A biotech company develops a neural patch that allows the wearer to feel exactly what another person is feeling — true, complete empathy. It's mandatory for all judges, politicians, and CEOs. Write about the unintended consequences: the politician who can't vote for war after feeling a soldier's fear, the judge who can't sentence anyone after feeling a prisoner's despair, the CEO who can't lay off workers after feeling their anxiety.

Tests the limits of empathy as a policy tool — is more empathy always better?

💡

Pro tip: The strongest version shows both the beauty and the breakdown. Total empathy might create better leaders — or it might make leadership impossible.

The Creativity Test

5/25

AI can now produce art, music, literature, and scientific theories indistinguishable from human output. To determine university admissions, job placement, and creative funding, society institutes a "creativity test" — work must be proven human-made. Write about a young artist who fails the test. Her work is flagged as "too perfect, likely AI-generated." It isn't. She's just that good. And now she can't prove it.

Inverts the Turing test — what happens when human creativity is indistinguishable from artificial?

💡

Pro tip: The Kafkaesque bureaucracy of proving your own humanity is the emotional core. The system designed to protect human creativity becomes the thing that destroys it.

Prompts get you started. Tutorials level you up.

A growing library of 300+ hands-on AI tutorials. New tutorials added every week.

Start 14-Day Free Trial

Space & Exploration

5 prompts

The Signal That Stopped

6/25

Humanity has been receiving a signal from a distant star system for 40 years — a steady, clearly artificial pulse that sparked the global space program. Trillions were invested. Generations were inspired. Then, three years before the first crewed ship arrives, the signal stops. Write the story of the crew who must decide: continue to a possibly dead or hostile origin, or turn back and face a humanity that spent everything on a signal that went silent.

A first-contact story where contact may have already ended — the tension of hope versus pragmatism across light-years.

💡

Pro tip: The decision should split the crew. Some want to see it through regardless; others want to preserve the ship for the journey home. Both positions are valid.

The Planet That Dreams

7/25

A survey team lands on a planet that appears lifeless — no organisms, no organic compounds, no movement. But every night, every crew member has the same dream: vivid, detailed, and clearly not their own. The planet is communicating through the human subconscious. Write the story of deciphering a language that only exists in sleep.

First contact through an unconventional medium — dreams as communication protocol.

💡

Pro tip: The dreams should be beautiful and specific enough to feel like a real message, not random noise. The crew must figure out the grammar of dreaming.

Generation Ship Democracy

8/25

A generation ship has been traveling for 80 years. The first generation chose the destination; the third generation wants to change course. They argue: we never agreed to this journey. We were born into a decision made by people who are dead. The ship's constitution says the destination can't be changed. Write the constitutional crisis that unfolds when a society questions the decisions of its founders.

A political sci-fi story that mirrors real-world debates about constitutional originalism and democratic consent.

💡

Pro tip: This is an allegory for any society grappling with decisions made by previous generations. Make both sides sympathetic.

The Astronaut Who Came Back Wrong

9/25

An astronaut returns from a solo deep-space mission that was supposed to last 6 months but lasted 3 years due to a malfunction. She passed every medical and psychological test. She remembers everything. But her partner, her friends, her colleagues — everyone who knew her well — says something is different. Not wrong, exactly. Just... different. As if someone reassembled her from a very detailed description.

Explores identity and the uncanny valley of almost-right — what does it mean to come back "yourself" from an experience no one else can understand?

💡

Pro tip: Never confirm whether she's actually changed or whether the people around her are projecting. The ambiguity IS the story.

The Speed of Light Divorce

10/25

A couple agrees that one partner will travel on a near-lightspeed mission (aging 2 years) while the other stays on Earth (aging 20 years). They promise to reunite. Write the reunion: one partner is still 35, the other is 53. They are technically still married. They are practically strangers. Time dilation didn't just separate them — it created two incompatible timelines of grief, growth, and change.

Uses the real physics of time dilation to explore what commitment means when time itself is unequal.

💡

Pro tip: The partner who stayed aged through real life: lost parents, raised kids, built a career, grieved alone. The traveler missed everything. Both have legitimate claims to the relationship.

Dystopian & Societal

5 prompts

The Productivity Score

11/25

Every citizen has a publicly visible Productivity Score calculated from their work output, social contributions, health metrics, and learning activities. Below 50, you lose access to premium services. Below 30, you lose housing priority. A data scientist discovers the algorithm is biased in a way that systematically scores caregivers, artists, and the elderly lower — and she has 48 hours before her own score drops below the threshold.

A social credit dystopia focused on what a society loses when it only measures productivity.

💡

Pro tip: The bias should be systemic, not malicious — the algorithm wasn't designed to discriminate; it simply can't measure what it can't quantify. That's scarier than intentional villainy.

The Last Library

12/25

In a world where all information is digital and algorithmically curated, one physical library remains — a resistance archive containing books, newspapers, and records that the algorithms have deprioritized into functional nonexistence. A young woman discovers the library and realizes that the history she was taught and the history on these shelves are fundamentally different stories. Write the awakening.

Explores information control, algorithmic curation, and the power of unfiltered access to the past.

💡

Pro tip: The dystopia should feel plausible and gentle. No one burned books — they just became irrelevant in an algorithm that optimizes for engagement.

The Emotion Regulation Act

13/25

A government passes legislation requiring all citizens to wear mood-regulating implants that prevent extreme emotions — no rage, no despair, no mania. Crime drops 90%. Suicide drops to zero. Art dies. Love becomes pleasant but never passionate. A black market emerges for "feeling sessions" — illegal gatherings where people remove their implants and experience unregulated emotion for the first time. Write from the perspective of someone attending their first session.

Asks whether a world without suffering is worth living in — and who profits from emotional control.

💡

Pro tip: The first unregulated emotion should be overwhelming and terrifying and beautiful all at once. Make the reader feel what the character is feeling for the first time.

The Water Wars

14/25

Fresh water has become the world's most valuable commodity. A hydrologist discovers an underground aquifer large enough to supply a continent — but it sits beneath the border of two nations already on the brink of war. She must decide: reveal the discovery (triggering a resource war), hide it (letting millions continue to suffer), or find a third option that might cost her life.

Near-future climate fiction with a moral dilemma that has no clean answer.

💡

Pro tip: Ground the geopolitics in personal stakes. The hydrologist should have family, connections, and specific reasons why each option costs her something she can't afford to lose.

The Opt-Out Generation

15/25

A generation of young people collectively opts out of all technology — no phones, no social media, no digital identity, no algorithmic life. They call themselves Ghosts. In a society where everything requires digital verification, they become legally invisible: can't vote, can't work, can't access healthcare. Write the story of a Ghost who must temporarily re-enter the digital world to save someone they love.

Explores digital dependency and the cost of disconnection in a connected world.

💡

Pro tip: The temporary return should be viscerally overwhelming. After years offline, every notification, every tracking pixel, every algorithm should feel like an assault.

Biotech & Human Enhancement

5 prompts

The Age Reversal Lottery

16/25

A pharmaceutical company develops a one-time treatment that reverses aging by 30 years — physically, not mentally. The treatment is prohibitively expensive and limited in supply: only 10,000 doses per year for a world of 8 billion. A global lottery determines who receives it. Write about the year after the first lottery: the social upheaval, the black market, the philosophical crisis of selected twenty-somethings with seventy years of memory, and the person who wins the lottery and isn't sure they want it.

Explores the social consequences of radical life extension when scarcity forces selection.

💡

Pro tip: The most interesting character is not the lucky winner but the people around them — the spouse who ages while their partner doesn't, the child who becomes physically older than their parent.

The Pain-Free Generation

17/25

Genetic engineering has eliminated the capacity for physical pain in the newest generation. They heal normally but feel nothing when injured. The first generation of pain-free children is now entering adolescence, and the consequences are emerging: they take extraordinary physical risks (they can't feel danger), they struggle to empathize with pain in others, and their emotional pain — which remains intact — has no physical language. Write from the perspective of a pain-free teenager and their pain-experiencing parent.

Asks whether physical pain is a bug or a feature, and what we lose when we engineer it away.

💡

Pro tip: The emotional dissonance between parent and child is the story's engine. The parent winces when the child is injured; the child doesn't understand why.

Custom Children

18/25

In a world where genetic selection of embryos is routine, a couple chooses to have a "natural" child — unselected, unoptimized, carrying whatever random genetic hand they're dealt. In school, their child is the only unenhanced student. Write the child's story: the social reality of being average in a world of optimized peers, the parents' second-guessing, and the question of whether being unmodified is a disability or a gift.

A Gattaca-adjacent premise that examines enhancement as social norm and the meaning of natural.

💡

Pro tip: The unenhanced child should have something the optimized children lack — not a superpower, but a quality that emerges from variability: unexpected creativity, unusual resilience, a form of thinking that optimization would have smoothed away.

The Hive Mind Volunteers

19/25

A neuroscience experiment allows ten volunteers to share consciousness — not just communication, but shared sensation, emotion, and thought. The initial euphoria of total understanding gives way to terror: individual identity starts dissolving. Whose memory is whose? Whose fear? Whose love? Write the moment one member wants to disconnect and discovers that the others can feel their desire to leave — and the group's emotional response makes leaving feel like betrayal.

Explores the tension between connection and autonomy — what happens when empathy becomes literal?

💡

Pro tip: The practical details matter: can they sleep independently? Do they share physical pain? Can they keep secrets? Each boundary question is a story question.

The Extinction Gene

20/25

Scientists discover a gene present in every human that, when activated, causes a peaceful death within one year. The gene appears to be intentionally engineered into human DNA — by whom or what is unknown. It has never been activated. A rogue geneticist claims she knows how to activate it and threatens to do so unless governments meet her demands for environmental reform. Write the geopolitical thriller and the investigation into who — or what — put a kill switch in human DNA.

Combines biological horror, conspiracy thriller, and existential philosophy into a single premise.

💡

Pro tip: The geneticist's demands should be reasonable — that's what makes her terrifying. She's not a villain who wants destruction. She's a person who decided that the threat of extinction is the only leverage that works.

Time & Reality

5 prompts

The Day That Repeats (But Only for You)

21/25

One person wakes up to discover they're repeating the same day — but unlike Groundhog Day, everyone else remembers the previous version. The world moves forward while this person relives Tuesday. Their coworkers reference a conversation from "yesterday's Tuesday." Their partner is confused by their repetitive behavior. The world experiences multiple Tuesdays in sequence; the protagonist experiences the same one. Write the escalating confusion and the search for an explanation.

A time loop with a twist — the world isn't looping, only the protagonist is, creating social and relational consequences.

💡

Pro tip: The social consequences are the story. Each repeated day, the protagonist's relationships deteriorate because they keep having conversations others remember differently.

Letters from Tomorrow

22/25

A woman starts receiving letters from herself — dated tomorrow. Each letter contains a single instruction: "Don't get on the train," "Say yes to the meeting," "Call your mother today." The instructions are always correct. Following them consistently improves her life. Then one day's letter says: "Don't open tomorrow's letter." Write the choice and its consequences.

A paradox story where knowing the future creates the very dilemma it was meant to prevent.

💡

Pro tip: The key question isn't whether the letters are real — it's whether a life lived by instruction is a life at all. The letter telling her to stop following letters is the most human instruction she's received.

The Reality Editor

23/25

A software engineer discovers that the simulation theory is true — and she can access the code. Small edits are possible: change a traffic light, alter a weather pattern, adjust a person's mood. But every edit has cascading consequences she can't predict. She uses it once to save a life. The ripple effects are catastrophic. She uses it again to fix the ripple effects. The new consequences are worse. Write her descent from power to responsibility to horror.

A god-power story where the lesson isn't the temptation of power but the impossibility of controlling complex systems.

💡

Pro tip: Each edit should feel justified in isolation and devastating in aggregate. She should never act from malice — only from care, urgency, and the belief that she can fix just one more thing.

The Memory Archive

24/25

A government offers citizens the option to archive their memories in a public database in exchange for a guaranteed income. Archived memories become public domain — anyone can experience your first kiss, your worst day, your private thoughts. Most of the poor opt in immediately. The wealthy opt out. Write about a memory archivist — the person who reviews and catalogs submitted memories — who discovers a memory that proves a sitting president committed a crime decades ago.

Explores memory as commodity, privacy as privilege, and the political power of lived experience.

💡

Pro tip: The class dimension is central: memory privacy as a luxury good creates a world where the rich have inner lives and the poor have public ones. That's the dystopia.

The Parallel Self

25/25

A device allows brief communication with your parallel-universe self — the version of you that made every major decision differently. Your parallel self has the career you abandoned, the relationship you ended, the city you left. But they also have the regrets of the opposite path. Write a conversation between two versions of the same person, each envying what the other has and each carrying what the other escaped.

Uses multiverse theory to explore the fundamental human question: would the other choice have been better?

💡

Pro tip: The conversation should reveal that both lives are exactly as imperfect as each person suspected the other path would be. There is no path without loss.

Frequently Asked Questions

The best science fiction uses a speculative premise (a "what if") to explore a fundamentally human question. The technology or world-building is the vehicle, not the destination. Philip K. Dick asked "what makes us human?" through androids. Ursula K. Le Guin explored gender through alien societies. Octavia Butler examined power through time travel and genetic manipulation. The common thread: every great sci-fi story is about people, not gadgets. The premise should be logically consistent (the rules of your world should follow from your initial speculation), the characters should be affected by the technology in specific, personal ways (not just living in a cool setting), and the story should ask a question that doesn't have a comfortable answer. If your sci-fi story could work equally well without the speculative element, the element isn't doing enough work.
The key principle is internal consistency — your technology doesn't need to be scientifically possible, but it needs to follow its own rules without contradiction. Three techniques: First, extrapolate from real science. The most believable sci-fi technologies are extensions of things that already exist. Gene editing is real; casual genetic modification is extrapolation. AI exists; artificial general intelligence is extrapolation. Second, show technology through its social effects, not its technical specs. You don't need to explain how the FTL drive works; you need to show how cheap interstellar travel changes immigration, family structure, and warfare. Third, include failure modes. Real technology breaks, has side effects, gets misused, and doesn't work for everyone equally. Technology without downsides reads as fantasy, not sci-fi.
Sci-fi short stories have a slightly wider range than other genres because world-building requires space. Flash sci-fi (under 1,000 words) works for single-concept stories with minimal world-building. Standard short stories (2,000-7,500 words) are the sweet spot for most sci-fi prompts — long enough to establish a world, develop a character, and resolve a conflict. Novelettes (7,500-17,500 words) allow for more complex worlds and multiple plot threads. For prompt-based writing, aim for 2,000-4,000 words. The common mistake in sci-fi is spending too many words on world-building and not enough on character and conflict. Your opening should establish both the world AND the protagonist's problem within the first page. Readers will tolerate unfamiliar settings if they immediately care about a person in that setting.
AI is a natural fit for sci-fi brainstorming because it excels at "what if" extrapolation. Use AI to: extend a technological premise to its logical social consequences, generate specific world-building details (what does a city look like when everyone has personal flight?), brainstorm second and third-order effects of speculative technology, and pressure-test your world's internal logic (describe your world's rules and ask AI to find contradictions). AI can also help with the research underpinning hard sci-fi — asking about actual physics, biology, or engineering to ensure your extrapolation starts from real science. For the writing itself, AI-generated sci-fi tends to default to familiar tropes and miss the genuine strangeness that makes great sci-fi memorable. The genre's power lies in showing readers something they've never imagined — and that requires human imagination operating at its most unconstrained.

Prompts are the starting line. Tutorials are the finish.

A growing library of 300+ hands-on tutorials on ChatGPT, Claude, Midjourney, and 50+ AI tools. New tutorials added every week.

14-day free trial. Cancel anytime.