I want the obvious stuff caught before I open a PR. This is my pre-review pass.

The workflow
- Open the diff in Cursor
- Ask it to review for bugs and edge cases
- Have it suggest tests for the risky paths
- Fix, then open the PR
Result: Fewer review comments and fewer regressions.
The prompt
Review this diff. List correctness bugs first, then missing edge cases, then suggested tests. Be specific and skip style nits.