Corrections

AI Academy corrections

Found a wrong price, an outdated limit or a feature that does not exist? Email techpresso@dupple.com with the page URL. We check the claim against the vendor’s own page and fix ours when it is wrong.

Published by Dupple·Last updated

How to report an error

Send an email to techpresso@dupple.com with:

  1. the URL of the AI Academy page;
  2. the sentence or number you believe is wrong;
  3. if you have it, a link to the vendor’s own page (pricing page, documentation or changelog) that shows the correct fact.

Vendors disputing a fact about their product should include that link: it is the only kind of source we can use. See the editorial policy for the full sourcing rules.

What happens next

What a correction is not

A correction fixes a fact. It does not change a verdict because a vendor would prefer a different one, and it cannot be bought. Opinions in a review or a comparison, such as who a plan is worth it for, change only when the facts behind them change. How we rate explains how verdicts are reached.

Recent corrections

DatePageWhat changed
Platform comparisons (AI Academy vs ...)Removed the star ratings and review counts shown for AI Academy and for eight other platforms (none had a source), the per-tutorial arithmetic and the "9x cheaper" claims. Rebuilt each page from the provider's own pages, read on October 14, 2026: for example, The Rundown AI Pro is $29 a month, not $999 a year.
Home page, role pages and ad landing pageRemoved a 4.9 rating from "200+ reviews", six testimonials with employer names, a customer logo wall, a "used by teams at" claim, "1,604 professionals" and made-up per-tutorial learner counts. Tutorial and tool counts are now read from our data instead of typed.
Is Cursor worth it (review) and Claude Code vs CursorCursor moved into The X Subscription on October 12, 2026 (Free, Plus $8, Premium $30, Super $100, Ultra $200). The review and the comparison were rewritten from cursor.com/pricing and x.ai on October 14.
Is Claude Pro worth it (review) and Claude comparisonsCorrected a table row that listed Fable as part of Claude Pro (Anthropic lists it through usage credits), updated model names and replaced a 500k-token context claim: Anthropic lists 1M tokens for its current models.
BlogPosts drafted by an article service are no longer indexed or listed in the sitemap, and every post is credited to the AI Academy editorial team instead of a named person who had not written or reviewed it.
About pageUpdated the Techpresso audience figure from 750,000+ to 780,000+ and the network figure to 930,000, as published on dupple.com/about on October 11, 2026.
Is Gamma worth it (review)An unchecked draft of this review was merged with another batch by mistake. We pulled it before it went live and published it only after its fact-check passed.
llms.txt and llms-full.txtRemoved claims that no longer held: that tutorials are text only (many now include video), a weekly publishing rate, a free trial on every plan (it applies to the annual plan only) and a reader count we do not publish. Both files are now generated from the same data as the pages.
Is Runway worth it (review)Corrected the Gen-4.5 video cost from 25 to 12 credits per second, the rate Runway publishes.
Free toolsThe page copy said results were emailed to you. They are not: the result appears on screen, and the email unlocks a download. The copy now says so.