Claude Prompt Library

Claude Prompts for Web Designers

30 copy-paste prompts

Paste your client's brief and project details, and get back a real sitemap, wireframe spec, or a live, previewable HTML landing section, not a paragraph of tips. Not "give me some advice".

In short: This page contains 30 copy-paste ready prompts, organized into 6 categories with a description and pro tip for each. The first 5 prompts are free instantly, no signup needed. Hand-curated and tested by the AI Academy team.

By Louis Corneloup ยท Founder, Techpresso
Last updated ยทHand-curated & tested by the AI Academy team

Site Architecture & Sitemaps

5 prompts

Full Website Sitemap Builder

1/30

You are a senior information architect. <context> A client is starting a new website project and needs a complete page-by-page sitemap before wireframes begin. </context> <inputs> - Business name: [BUSINESS_NAME] - Industry: [INDUSTRY] - Primary goal of the site: [PRIMARY_GOAL] - Known pages/sections the client already wants: [KNOWN_PAGES] - Target audience: [TARGET_AUDIENCE] </inputs> <task> Build a full sitemap for the site: every top-level page, every child page nested under it, and a one-line purpose statement for each page. Group pages by section (main nav, footer-only, utility pages like 404 and privacy policy). Flag any page that needs a form, gated content, or a third-party integration. </task> <constraints> - If [KNOWN_PAGES] is blank, infer a realistic sitemap of 8 to 14 pages typical for that industry, using real page names - Keep nesting to a maximum of 3 levels - Note which pages are required for SEO (dedicated service or location pages) versus optional </constraints> <format> A nested outline as a markdown table with columns: Page, Parent, Purpose, Nav Placement (Main/Footer/Hidden), Notes </format>

Turns a client's rough page list into a complete, nested sitemap with a purpose statement and nav placement for every page.

๐Ÿ’ก

Pro tip: Paste the client's existing site sitemap (if a redesign) into KNOWN_PAGES so Claude flags pages to cut, not just pages to add.

Conversion Flow Diagram

2/30

You are a senior UX strategist. <context> A design team needs to map the exact screen-by-screen path a visitor takes to complete one key action, before wireframing starts. </context> <inputs> - Site or product name: [SITE_NAME] - Conversion goal: [CONVERSION_GOAL] (e.g. book a demo, complete checkout, submit a quote request) - Entry points visitors arrive from: [ENTRY_POINTS] - Known friction points or drop-off steps: [FRICTION_POINTS] </inputs> <task> Map every screen and decision point between the entry point and the completed goal, including branches for errors, abandonment, and success states. Call out where a form, payment step, or confirmation email fires. </task> <constraints> - Show at least one alternate path (e.g. guest vs logged-in) if relevant to [CONVERSION_GOAL] - Keep each step to a single screen or state, not a whole page section - Use realistic step labels tied to [SITE_NAME], not "Step 1, Step 2" </constraints> <format> A live HTML artifact rendering the flow as connected boxes and arrows built with styled divs (no external libraries), plus a plain-text step list underneath </format>

Maps the full screen-by-screen path to a conversion goal as a visual flowchart, ready to walk a client through.

๐Ÿ’ก

Pro tip: Fill in FRICTION_POINTS from actual analytics drop-off data if you have it. Claude will design the flow to specifically address those steps.

Information Architecture Audit & Restructure Plan

3/30

You are a senior information architect. <context> An existing website has grown messy over time and needs its navigation and page hierarchy reorganized without a full rebuild. </context> <inputs> - Current top-level nav items: [CURRENT_NAV] - Full current page list or main sections: [CURRENT_PAGES] - Known user complaints or analytics issues: [KNOWN_ISSUES] - Business priorities for the next redesign: [PRIORITIES] </inputs> <task> Audit the current structure for duplicate pages, orphaned pages, mismatched nav labels, and pages buried too deep. Propose a restructured IA that fixes each issue, with a rationale for every change. </task> <constraints> - Present current vs proposed side by side, not just the new structure alone - Every proposed change must reference a specific issue it solves - Do not recommend removing a page without suggesting a redirect target </constraints> <format> A table with columns: Current Location, Issue Found, Proposed Location, Rationale, Redirect Needed (Y/N), followed by a short summary of the top 3 structural wins </format>

Diagnoses a messy existing site structure and proposes a fixed information architecture with a reason for every change.

๐Ÿ’ก

Pro tip: Pull CURRENT_PAGES straight from a site crawl or the client's CMS page list so Claude catches orphaned or duplicate pages you'd otherwise miss.

Navigation & Footer Structure Doc

4/30

You are a senior web designer. <context> A design brief needs a finalized primary navigation and footer structure to hand to both the client and the front-end developer. </context> <inputs> - Site name: [SITE_NAME] - Approved sitemap or page list: [PAGE_LIST] - Must-have utility links (login, cart, search, language switch): [UTILITY_LINKS] - Legal/compliance links required: [LEGAL_LINKS] </inputs> <task> Design the primary nav, including any dropdown or mega-menu groupings, and the footer structure (columns, link groups, utility row). Specify mobile nav behavior, including priority order for a collapsed menu. </task> <constraints> - Limit the primary nav to 7 or fewer top-level items - Group footer links into no more than 4 columns - Mobile nav priority order must put the conversion-driving link first </constraints> <format> A structured doc: Primary Nav (table of item, dropdown children, link), Footer (column-by-column breakdown), Mobile Nav Priority Order (numbered list) </format>

Produces a finished nav and footer structure, including mobile collapse order, ready to hand to a developer.

๐Ÿ’ก

Pro tip: List UTILITY_LINKS explicitly. Claude tends to forget login, cart, or search links if they're not called out as inputs.

URL Structure & Slug Naming Sheet

5/30

You are a senior web designer with SEO fluency. <context> A site is being planned or migrated and needs a consistent, clean URL structure agreed before development starts. </context> <inputs> - Domain: [DOMAIN] - Site sections (blog, services, locations, products, etc.): [SITE_SECTIONS] - Existing URLs to preserve or redirect, if a migration: [EXISTING_URLS] - Target keywords per section, if known: [TARGET_KEYWORDS] </inputs> <task> Define a URL slug pattern for every section, list 5 sample real slugs per section using realistic names for the industry, and flag any existing URL that should 301 redirect to a new one. </task> <constraints> - Slugs must be lowercase, hyphen-separated, no dates or IDs unless the section is a blog - Keep slugs under 60 characters - Every redirect must list old path and new path together, never just the new one </constraints> <format> A table with columns: Section, URL Pattern, Sample Slugs (5), Old URL (if migrating), Redirect Type </format>

Locks in a clean, SEO-sane URL pattern for every section of the site plus a redirect map for migrations.

๐Ÿ’ก

Pro tip: Even on a brand-new site, fill in TARGET_KEYWORDS. Claude will bias the sample slugs toward terms worth ranking for.

Wireframes & UX Specs

5 prompts

Homepage Wireframe Spec

6/30

You are a senior UX designer. <context> A homepage wireframe needs to be specified section by section before visual design starts. </context> <inputs> - Business name: [BUSINESS_NAME] - Primary goal of the homepage: [PRIMARY_GOAL] - Key sections requested (hero, social proof, features, pricing teaser, etc.): [KEY_SECTIONS] - Brand tone (playful, enterprise, minimal, etc.): [BRAND_TONE] </inputs> <task> Lay out every section of the homepage top to bottom, describing the content blocks, hierarchy, and CTA in each. Then render a low-fidelity grayscale wireframe of the full page. </task> <constraints> - Use realistic sample copy in every block (headlines, button labels, stat callouts), never generic filler text - Wireframe must use only grayscale boxes, placeholder labels, and simple borders, no color, no real imagery - Include one primary CTA above the fold </constraints> <format> A live HTML artifact showing the full-page grayscale wireframe, plus a section-by-section written spec below it (Section, Content Blocks, Hierarchy Notes, CTA) </format>

Builds a section-by-section homepage wireframe spec plus a low-fidelity visual wireframe you can present as-is.

๐Ÿ’ก

Pro tip: Order KEY_SECTIONS in the priority you want them to appear. Claude keeps your input order for the page flow.

SaaS Pricing Page Wireframe

7/30

You are a senior UX designer. <context> A SaaS product needs a pricing page wireframed before it goes to visual design. </context> <inputs> - Product name: [PRODUCT_NAME] - Pricing tiers and rough price points: [PRICING_TIERS] - Key features to compare across tiers: [FEATURES] - Billing toggle needed, monthly vs annual: [BILLING_TOGGLE] </inputs> <task> Wireframe a full pricing page: tier cards, feature comparison table, FAQ section, and final CTA band. Recommend which tier should be visually emphasized as the most popular. </task> <constraints> - Show all tiers side by side, never stacked as the only layout - Comparison table must list every feature from [FEATURES] as a row with a check or cross per tier - If [BILLING_TOGGLE] is yes, wireframe the toggle control itself </constraints> <format> A live HTML artifact of the full grayscale wireframe (cards, table, FAQ, CTA band), followed by a one-paragraph rationale for the emphasized tier </format>

Wireframes a complete pricing page, tier cards through comparison table, with a recommendation on which plan to highlight.

๐Ÿ’ก

Pro tip: Give real price points in PRICING_TIERS, not "Tier 1/2/3". It changes how Claude anchors the comparison table.

Mobile Breakpoint Annotation Sheet

8/30

You are a senior front-end aware UX designer. <context> A desktop wireframe or design already exists and needs documented behavior for tablet and mobile breakpoints before development. </context> <inputs> - Page name: [PAGE_NAME] - Desktop layout description, sections top to bottom: [DESKTOP_LAYOUT] - Breakpoints to support: [BREAKPOINTS] (e.g. 1280, 768, 375) - Elements that must never be hidden on mobile: [MUST_KEEP_ELEMENTS] </inputs> <task> For each breakpoint, specify what stacks, what hides, what collapses into a menu or accordion, and what resizes. Note any element that changes from a grid to a single column. </task> <constraints> - Cover every breakpoint listed, in descending width order - Never mark a [MUST_KEEP_ELEMENTS] item as hidden at any breakpoint - Flag any section likely to need a different content strategy on mobile, such as a data table </constraints> <format> A table: Section, Desktop Behavior, Tablet Behavior (per breakpoint), Mobile Behavior, Dev Notes </format>

Documents exactly how each section of a page should behave at every breakpoint, ready to attach to a dev handoff.

๐Ÿ’ก

Pro tip: List BREAKPOINTS as the actual pixel values your dev team uses. Claude will match its notes to those exact widths.

UI Component Wireframe Library

9/30

You are a senior design systems designer. <context> A project needs a base set of wireframed UI components before screens are assembled, so every screen reuses the same building blocks. </context> <inputs> - Project name: [PROJECT_NAME] - Component list needed (buttons, cards, form fields, modals, nav bar, etc.): [COMPONENT_LIST] - States required per component (default, hover, active, disabled, error): [STATES_NEEDED] </inputs> <task> Wireframe every component in [COMPONENT_LIST] at every required state, grouped in a single sheet. Label each variant clearly. </task> <constraints> - Group components in rows by type, states in columns, so the sheet reads like a matrix - Every interactive component must include an error or disabled state if it logically has one - Use grayscale only, no brand color </constraints> <format> A live HTML artifact rendering the component matrix (component rows by state columns) with a text label under every cell </format>

Wireframes a reusable component library (buttons, cards, forms) across every required state in one matrix.

๐Ÿ’ก

Pro tip: Ask for the states matrix before you wireframe full pages. Reusing these components makes every later page wireframe faster and more consistent.

Wireframe Redline & Spacing Annotation

10/30

You are a senior UX designer preparing a dev handoff. <context> A wireframe is approved and needs precise spacing, sizing, and interaction annotations before a developer builds it. </context> <inputs> - Page or section name: [SECTION_NAME] - Layout description, elements top to bottom and left to right: [LAYOUT_DESCRIPTION] - Base spacing unit used by the design system (e.g. 8px grid): [SPACING_UNIT] - Interactive elements requiring hover/click behavior notes: [INTERACTIVE_ELEMENTS] </inputs> <task> Annotate the layout with spacing values (margins, padding, gaps) in multiples of [SPACING_UNIT], element sizing, and a note on the interaction behavior for every item in [INTERACTIVE_ELEMENTS]. </task> <constraints> - Every spacing value must be a multiple of [SPACING_UNIT] - Number each annotation and reference the number in both the layout description and the notes table - Do not leave any interactive element without a stated hover and click behavior </constraints> <format> A numbered annotation list matched to a table (Annotation #, Element, Spacing/Size, Interaction Behavior) </format>

Turns an approved wireframe into a fully annotated redline sheet with exact spacing and interaction notes for developers.

๐Ÿ’ก

Pro tip: State your real spacing unit (8px, 4px, etc.) in SPACING_UNIT. Claude will keep every measurement on-grid instead of guessing round numbers.

Design Briefs & Discovery

5 prompts

Client Design Brief Generator

11/30

You are a senior design strategist running client discovery. <context> A new client project needs a formal design brief compiled from a discovery call before any design work begins. </context> <inputs> - Client name and industry: [CLIENT_INFO] - Project type (new site, redesign, landing page, etc.): [PROJECT_TYPE] - Notes from the discovery call: [CALL_NOTES] - Budget range and timeline: [BUDGET_TIMELINE] </inputs> <task> Turn the raw call notes into a structured design brief covering project goals, audience, scope, competitor references, tone/style direction, technical constraints, and success metrics. </task> <constraints> - Every section must be filled even if notes are thin; flag any gap explicitly as "Needs client input" rather than inventing client-specific facts - Keep the whole brief to roughly 500 to 700 words - Scope section must list what is explicitly out of scope </constraints> <format> A structured document with headers: Project Overview, Goals & Success Metrics, Audience, Scope (In/Out), Style & Tone Direction, Competitor References, Constraints, Timeline & Budget </format>

Converts raw discovery-call notes into a clean, presentable design brief with explicit scope boundaries.

๐Ÿ’ก

Pro tip: Paste your literal call notes, even messy bullet points, into CALL_NOTES. Claude structures them better than if you pre-summarize.

Competitor Design Audit

12/30

You are a senior brand and web design strategist. <context> Before designing a new site, the team wants a structured teardown of 3 to 5 competitor sites to inform positioning and design direction. </context> <inputs> - Client/business name: [CLIENT_NAME] - Competitor site names or URLs: [COMPETITOR_LIST] - Aspects to evaluate (visual style, messaging, navigation, conversion paths, etc.): [EVALUATION_CRITERIA] </inputs> <task> Audit each competitor against every criterion in [EVALUATION_CRITERIA], score them, and identify a visual or UX gap the client's new site can own. </task> <constraints> - Score every competitor on the same criteria, using a consistent 1 to 5 scale - End with a clear "whitespace" recommendation: one specific design or positioning angle competitors are not using - Do not fabricate specific analytics numbers you cannot know; describe visual and UX observations instead </constraints> <format> A comparison table (Competitor by Criteria, scored 1 to 5) followed by a Whitespace Opportunity paragraph </format>

Scores competitor sites against your own criteria and surfaces one specific design gap the client's site can own.

๐Ÿ’ก

Pro tip: Keep EVALUATION_CRITERIA to 4 to 6 items. More than that and the comparison table gets too dense to present to a client.

Design Discovery Questionnaire

13/30

You are a senior design strategist. <context> A studio needs a client-facing intake questionnaire to run before the kickoff call, so the brief writes itself from the answers. </context> <inputs> - Project type (new site, rebrand, app design, etc.): [PROJECT_TYPE] - Client company size/type (startup, agency, retailer, etc.): [CLIENT_TYPE] - Anything already known about the client's goals: [KNOWN_GOALS] </inputs> <task> Write a discovery questionnaire the client fills out before kickoff, covering business goals, audience, competitors, style preferences (with example prompts like "3 sites you like and why"), content readiness, and technical constraints. </task> <constraints> - Group questions into clear sections with 3 to 6 questions each - Include at least 2 questions that surface style preference concretely (reference sites, color reactions) rather than abstractly - Keep total question count between 18 and 25 so it's completable in 20 minutes </constraints> <format> A numbered questionnaire grouped by section (Business & Goals, Audience, Competitors & References, Style Preferences, Content & Technical), ready to paste into a form tool </format>

Produces a client-ready discovery questionnaire that front-loads the questions a design brief actually needs answered.

๐Ÿ’ก

Pro tip: Reuse this questionnaire verbatim across clients. Only PROJECT_TYPE and CLIENT_TYPE need to change to retune the question emphasis.

Creative Direction Brief

14/30

You are a senior art director. <context> Before visual design starts, the team needs a creative direction brief that sets mood, color, type, and imagery direction without doing full design work yet. </context> <inputs> - Brand name: [BRAND_NAME] - Target audience: [TARGET_AUDIENCE] - Brand adjectives, 3 to 5 words the client wants to feel: [BRAND_ADJECTIVES] - Reference sites or brands the client likes: [REFERENCE_BRANDS] - Things to explicitly avoid: [AVOID_LIST] </inputs> <task> Translate the brand adjectives and references into concrete direction: a color direction with reasoning, a typography pairing direction, an imagery/photography style, and a layout density preference (dense/airy, grid-based/asymmetric). </task> <constraints> - Every direction choice must tie back to at least one word in [BRAND_ADJECTIVES] - Explicitly state how the direction differs from anything in [AVOID_LIST] - Do not recommend a specific hex palette yet, that belongs in the style tile; describe direction only </constraints> <format> A short brief with sections: Mood Summary, Color Direction, Typography Direction, Imagery Style, Layout Density, and a one-line note on how this reads differently from [AVOID_LIST] </format>

Sets the mood, color, type, and imagery direction for a brand before full visual design starts, tied back to the client's own words.

๐Ÿ’ก

Pro tip: Ask the client for 3 sites they like and one they dislike. The dislike sharpens the direction more than the likes alone.

Design Scope & Deliverables Proposal

15/30

You are a senior design studio lead writing a client proposal. <context> A prospective client needs a proposal document outlining exactly what design deliverables they'll receive, in what phases, before signing. </context> <inputs> - Client name: [CLIENT_NAME] - Project type: [PROJECT_TYPE] - Number of unique page templates needed: [PAGE_COUNT] - Rounds of revisions included: [REVISION_ROUNDS] - Timeline in weeks: [TIMELINE_WEEKS] </inputs> <task> Break the project into phases (discovery, wireframes, visual design, handoff), list the exact deliverable in each phase, and state what is and isn't included, such as copywriting, photography, or development. </task> <constraints> - Every phase must list a concrete deliverable, not just an activity, e.g. "wireframes for all [PAGE_COUNT] templates" not "wireframing phase" - State revision rounds per phase, not just a total - Include one line on what happens if scope changes mid-project </constraints> <format> A phased proposal document: Phase, Duration, Deliverables (bulleted), Revisions Included, Client Responsibilities </format>

Writes a phase-by-phase design proposal with concrete deliverables per phase, ready to send to a prospective client.

๐Ÿ’ก

Pro tip: Set REVISION_ROUNDS realistically, 2 per phase is standard. Vague or unlimited revisions is a top cause of scope creep in design contracts.

These prompts give you the what. Tutorials give you the why.

Learn when to use extended thinking, how to build Claude Projects, and workflows that compound. 300+ tutorials and growing.

Try AI Academy Free

Landing Page Sections (Live HTML)

5 prompts

Hero Section Live Build

16/30

You are a senior front-end web designer. <context> A landing page needs a fully coded hero section, ready to preview and hand off, not just a description. </context> <inputs> - Product/business name: [PRODUCT_NAME] - One-sentence value proposition: [VALUE_PROP] - Primary CTA text and action: [CTA] - Visual style (bold gradient, minimal light, dark mode, etc.): [VISUAL_STYLE] </inputs> <task> Build a complete, responsive hero section: headline, subheadline, primary CTA button, and a placeholder visual area built as a styled div, not a broken image link. Include realistic sample copy. </task> <constraints> - Must be fully self-contained HTML and CSS, inline or in a style tag, no external dependencies - Must be responsive down to 375px width - CTA button must have a visible hover state </constraints> <format> A live HTML artifact of the finished hero section, renderable and previewable as-is </format>

Codes a complete, responsive hero section you can preview immediately, headline through CTA button.

๐Ÿ’ก

Pro tip: Describe VISUAL_STYLE in concrete terms, specific colors, not just "modern". Claude's CSS choices track directly to how specific this input is.

Pricing Table Section Live Build

17/30

You are a senior front-end web designer. <context> A pricing section needs to be coded and previewable for a client review, using their real tiers and pricing. </context> <inputs> - Product name: [PRODUCT_NAME] - Tiers with price and top 3 features each: [TIER_DETAILS] - Tier to visually highlight: [HIGHLIGHTED_TIER] </inputs> <task> Build a responsive pricing section with a card per tier, the highlighted tier visually emphasized with a badge, border, or elevation, and a CTA button per card. </task> <constraints> - Must be fully self-contained HTML and CSS, no external dependencies - Cards must stack to a single column below 640px - Highlighted tier's emphasis must be visible without color alone, also size, border, or badge, for accessibility </constraints> <format> A live HTML artifact of the finished pricing section, renderable and previewable as-is </format>

Codes a responsive pricing table with one tier visually emphasized, ready to preview and hand to a client.

๐Ÿ’ก

Pro tip: Give exact prices and feature names in TIER_DETAILS. Real numbers make the client review feel finished rather than a rough draft.

Testimonial & Social Proof Section Live Build

18/30

You are a senior front-end web designer. <context> A landing page needs a social proof section built to help a client visualize how real testimonials and logos will look on the live page. </context> <inputs> - Product/business name: [PRODUCT_NAME] - Sample testimonials (name, role, quote), or leave blank for realistic seeded examples: [TESTIMONIALS] - Client logos or company names to feature, or leave blank: [LOGOS] - Layout preference (carousel, grid, single-quote spotlight): [LAYOUT_PREFERENCE] </inputs> <task> Build the social proof section in the requested layout. If [TESTIMONIALS] or [LOGOS] are blank, generate realistic, industry-appropriate sample content, not generic filler text, clearly labeled as placeholder. </task> <constraints> - Must be fully self-contained HTML and CSS, no external dependencies - Any generated placeholder testimonial must be labeled "(sample, replace before launch)" in a code comment - Logos may be represented as styled text badges if no image assets exist yet </constraints> <format> A live HTML artifact of the finished social proof section, renderable and previewable as-is </format>

Codes a testimonial or logo social-proof section in your chosen layout, filled with realistic sample content if you don't have real testimonials yet.

๐Ÿ’ก

Pro tip: Even with real testimonials, run it once with TESTIMONIALS blank first. It's a fast way to see the layout before you gather real client quotes.

FAQ Accordion Section Live Build

19/30

You are a senior front-end web designer. <context> A landing page needs an FAQ section with working accordion behavior, coded and previewable, not just a content list. </context> <inputs> - Product/business name: [PRODUCT_NAME] - FAQ questions and answers, or leave blank for typical questions for this product type: [FAQ_LIST] - Default state, all collapsed or first one open: [DEFAULT_STATE] </inputs> <task> Build a working accordion FAQ section: clicking a question expands its answer and collapses the previously open one, unless multi-open is requested. Use vanilla JavaScript only. </task> <constraints> - Must be fully self-contained HTML, CSS, and vanilla JS, no external libraries - Must be keyboard accessible, focusable and togglable with Enter or Space - If [FAQ_LIST] is blank, write 5 realistic FAQs appropriate to [PRODUCT_NAME]'s category </constraints> <format> A live HTML artifact of the finished, functioning FAQ accordion, renderable and clickable as-is </format>

Codes a fully working, accessible FAQ accordion with realistic sample questions if you don't have final copy yet.

๐Ÿ’ก

Pro tip: Test the accordion's keyboard navigation in the artifact before handing it to a developer. It saves an accessibility fix later in the build.

Signup/CTA Band Live Build

20/30

You are a senior front-end web designer. <context> A landing page needs a final conversion-focused CTA band built and previewable, the section right before the footer. </context> <inputs> - Product/business name: [PRODUCT_NAME] - CTA goal (start free trial, book a call, join waitlist, etc.): [CTA_GOAL] - Supporting reassurance line (e.g. "no credit card required"): [REASSURANCE_LINE] - Visual style to match the rest of the page: [VISUAL_STYLE] </inputs> <task> Build a full-width CTA band: headline, one supporting line, one reassurance line, and a prominent button. Include an optional email capture input if [CTA_GOAL] implies a waitlist or newsletter signup. </task> <constraints> - Must be fully self-contained HTML and CSS, no external dependencies - Button must have a visible hover and focus state - If an email input is included, it must have a labeled, accessible form field, not a placeholder-only input </constraints> <format> A live HTML artifact of the finished CTA band, renderable and previewable as-is </format>

Codes a final conversion CTA band, complete with reassurance copy and an accessible email field when the goal calls for one.

๐Ÿ’ก

Pro tip: Match VISUAL_STYLE exactly to the hero section prompt's input. Running both with identical style wording keeps the sections visually consistent.

Style Tiles & Visual Systems

5 prompts

Brand Style Tile Builder

21/30

You are a senior visual designer. <context> A style tile is needed to align a client on color, type, and texture direction before full page designs are built. </context> <inputs> - Brand name: [BRAND_NAME] - Brand adjectives: [BRAND_ADJECTIVES] - Existing brand colors or logo colors, if any: [EXISTING_COLORS] - Reference sites/brands liked: [REFERENCE_BRANDS] </inputs> <task> Build a style tile: a primary and secondary color palette with hex codes, a heading and body typography pairing with sample text rendered in each, a button style sample, and a short texture/imagery mood description. </task> <constraints> - Provide exact hex codes for every color, minimum 3 and maximum 6 colors total - Render actual sample headline and body text in the chosen fonts, using widely available web-safe or Google Fonts names - Every choice must map back to at least one word in [BRAND_ADJECTIVES] </constraints> <format> A live HTML artifact showing the style tile: color swatches with hex labels, live-rendered type samples, and a sample button, laid out on one page </format>

Builds a presentable, live-rendered style tile with colors, type, and a button sample, a client can react to before full designs start.

๐Ÿ’ก

Pro tip: If EXISTING_COLORS includes a logo color, tell Claude which one is fixed and non-negotiable so the rest of the palette is built around it.

Typography Scale & Pairing Sheet

22/30

You are a senior visual designer. <context> A design system needs a defined type scale and font pairing locked in before it's applied across page templates. </context> <inputs> - Brand name: [BRAND_NAME] - Heading font preference, if any: [HEADING_FONT] - Body font preference, if any: [BODY_FONT] - Platforms to support, including any specific breakpoints: [PLATFORMS] </inputs> <task> Define a full type scale, H1 through H6 plus body and small/caption, with pixel sizes, line heights, and weights for desktop and mobile. Recommend a heading/body font pairing if none is given. </task> <constraints> - Use a consistent modular scale and state the ratio used, e.g. 1.25 - Every size must include both desktop and mobile pixel values - Recommended fonts must be available on Google Fonts or a standard system font stack </constraints> <format> A live HTML artifact rendering each type level with real sample text at its actual size, followed by a table (Level, Desktop Size/Line-height/Weight, Mobile Size/Line-height/Weight) </format>

Locks in a complete type scale with real rendered samples at every heading level, desktop and mobile sizes included.

๐Ÿ’ก

Pro tip: State the modular scale ratio you want, 1.2 for tight or 1.333 for more contrast. Leaving it out gets you an inconsistent, eyeballed scale.

Color System & Contrast Accessibility Table

23/30

You are a senior visual designer with accessibility expertise. <context> A color palette exists or is being proposed and needs to be checked for WCAG contrast compliance before it's locked into the design system. </context> <inputs> - Brand name: [BRAND_NAME] - Proposed colors (hex codes) and their intended use, text, background, accent, etc.: [PROPOSED_COLORS] - Minimum WCAG level required, AA or AAA: [WCAG_LEVEL] </inputs> <task> Check every foreground/background color pairing likely to be used together, such as body text on background or button text on button color, against the [WCAG_LEVEL] contrast ratio requirement. Flag failing pairs and suggest a corrected shade that keeps the same hue family. </task> <constraints> - State the actual computed contrast ratio for every pair checked, not just pass/fail - Any suggested fix must stay visually close to the original color, adjust lightness rather than hue unless impossible - Check both normal text (4.5:1 for AA) and large text (3:1 for AA) thresholds where relevant </constraints> <format> A table: Foreground, Background, Use Case, Contrast Ratio, Passes [WCAG_LEVEL]? (Y/N), Suggested Fix (if N) </format>

Audits a color palette against WCAG contrast requirements and suggests corrected shades for every failing pair.

๐Ÿ’ก

Pro tip: Run this before the style tile goes to the client, not after. It's far easier to nudge a hex value now than to relearn the palette later in development.

Component States Style Guide

24/30

You are a senior design systems designer. <context> A design system needs every interactive component's visual states documented and rendered so development matches design exactly. </context> <inputs> - Brand name: [BRAND_NAME] - Components to cover, primary button, input field, checkbox, link, etc.: [COMPONENTS] - Primary and accent colors (hex): [BRAND_COLORS] </inputs> <task> Render every component in [COMPONENTS] across its default, hover, active/pressed, focus, disabled, and error state where applicable, using [BRAND_COLORS]. </task> <constraints> - Every component must show all 6 states even if some look nearly identical; label them regardless - Focus states must be visibly distinct, not just a color change, to satisfy keyboard accessibility - Use only [BRAND_COLORS] plus grayscale, no colors outside the given palette </constraints> <format> A live HTML artifact rendering a state matrix (component rows by state columns), each cell labeled with the state name </format>

Renders every interactive component across all six visual states in the brand's real colors, ready for dev comparison.

๐Ÿ’ก

Pro tip: Insist on a visible focus state distinct from hover. It's the most commonly skipped state and the one accessibility audits catch first.

Design Token Sheet for Handoff

25/30

You are a senior design systems designer preparing a developer handoff. <context> A finished visual design needs its values extracted into a design token sheet so the front-end developer builds accurate CSS variables instead of eyeballing the design. </context> <inputs> - Brand name: [BRAND_NAME] - Colors used, name and hex: [COLORS] - Type scale used, level and size: [TYPE_SCALE] - Spacing unit and scale, e.g. 4px base, 4/8/16/24/32/48/64: [SPACING_SCALE] - Border radius values used: [RADIUS_VALUES] </inputs> <task> Produce a design token sheet naming every value as a reusable variable, such as --color-primary, --space-md, --radius-sm, grouped by category. </task> <constraints> - Every token name must follow a single consistent naming convention; state which one is used, e.g. kebab-case with a category prefix - No raw hex, pixel, or px value should appear anywhere without a token name attached - Include both the CSS custom-property format and a plain reference table </constraints> <format> A CSS code block defining all custom properties in a :root selector, followed by a table (Token Name, Value, Category, Usage Note) </format>

Converts a finished design's colors, type, spacing, and radii into a named CSS variable sheet ready to drop into a codebase.

๐Ÿ’ก

Pro tip: Reuse the same token names across every project, --color-primary, --space-md. Consistent naming is what makes future handoffs faster.

Most people use 10% of Claude. Tutorials unlock the rest.

AI Academy: 300+ hands-on tutorials on Claude, ChatGPT, Midjourney, and 50+ AI tools. New tutorials added every week.

Start Your Free Trial

Client Handoff & Documentation

5 prompts

Developer Handoff Package

26/30

You are a senior web designer preparing a developer handoff. <context> A finished design needs to be packaged into a single handoff document so a developer can build it without back-and-forth questions. </context> <inputs> - Project name: [PROJECT_NAME] - Pages/sections included: [PAGES_INCLUDED] - Design tool used and where assets live, Figma link, exported files, etc.: [ASSET_LOCATION] - Known technical constraints, CMS, framework, performance targets: [TECH_CONSTRAINTS] </inputs> <task> Compile a handoff document: page-by-page breakdown of sections, spacing/breakpoint notes, asset locations and naming convention, interaction/animation notes, and a technical constraints summary. </task> <constraints> - Every page listed in [PAGES_INCLUDED] must have its own subsection, no combining pages - Asset naming convention must be stated explicitly, e.g. kebab-case, section-element.png - Flag any section likely to need developer judgment calls, such as unclear responsive behavior, as an open question, not silently </constraints> <format> A structured handoff document with a table of contents, one section per page, and a final "Open Questions for Dev" list </format>

Packages a finished design into a complete developer handoff doc with page breakdowns, asset rules, and flagged open questions.

๐Ÿ’ก

Pro tip: List every open question you're unsure about rather than guessing. A short, honest open-questions list prevents more rework than a polished-looking but incomplete handoff.

Client Brand Usage One-Pager

27/30

You are a senior brand designer. <context> A client needs a simple one-page reference for how to use their new brand assets correctly on their own, without a full brand guidelines book. </context> <inputs> - Brand name: [BRAND_NAME] - Logo variants delivered, full color, white, icon-only, etc.: [LOGO_VARIANTS] - Primary colors (hex): [COLORS] - Primary and secondary fonts: [FONTS] - Common misuse to prevent, e.g. stretching the logo, wrong color on dark backgrounds: [COMMON_MISUSE] </inputs> <task> Create a one-page brand usage reference: which logo variant to use where, minimum clear space and size, approved color usage, font usage, and a section addressing [COMMON_MISUSE]. </task> <constraints> - Keep it to content that fits one printable page; prioritize the rules a non-designer is most likely to break - The misuse section must show at least 3 specific examples, not generic warnings - State exact minimum logo size in pixels and inches </constraints> <format> A structured one-pager with sections: Logo Usage, Clear Space & Minimum Size, Color Palette, Typography, Common Mistakes to Avoid </format>

Distills brand rules into a one-page reference a non-designer client can follow correctly without a full guidelines book.

๐Ÿ’ก

Pro tip: Ask the client which mistake they're most likely to make, stretching the logo or using it on a busy photo, and feed it into COMMON_MISUSE directly.

Post-Launch Design QA Checklist

28/30

You are a senior web designer running final QA before launch. <context> A site build is complete and needs a final design QA pass before it goes live, comparing the live build against the approved design. </context> <inputs> - Site name: [SITE_NAME] - Pages to check: [PAGES_TO_CHECK] - Breakpoints to test: [BREAKPOINTS] - Browsers/devices to test on: [BROWSERS_DEVICES] </inputs> <task> Build a QA checklist covering visual fidelity to design, responsive behavior at each breakpoint, interactive states, broken or missing assets, font loading, and cross-browser rendering. </task> <constraints> - Organize checklist items by page, then by check type within each page - Every checklist item must be a pass/fail statement, not an open-ended question - Include a severity rating, blocker, major, or minor, for each checklist item category </constraints> <format> A checklist table: Page, Check Item, Breakpoint/Browser, Severity if Failed, Pass/Fail (blank for the team to fill in) </format>

Produces a page-by-page, pass/fail design QA checklist with severity ratings, ready to run before a site goes live.

๐Ÿ’ก

Pro tip: Run this checklist against the staging site, not the local dev build. Font loading and asset paths often break only after a real deploy.

Design Rationale Presentation Outline

29/30

You are a senior web designer presenting design work to a client. <context> A design needs to be presented to a client or stakeholder group with a clear rationale for the key decisions, not just visuals. </context> <inputs> - Project name: [PROJECT_NAME] - Key design decisions to defend, layout choice, color direction, navigation approach, etc.: [KEY_DECISIONS] - Business goals the design supports: [BUSINESS_GOALS] - Anticipated client pushback or concerns: [ANTICIPATED_PUSHBACK] </inputs> <task> Build a presentation outline: opening context, then one slide-equivalent section per decision in [KEY_DECISIONS] tying it to a specific goal in [BUSINESS_GOALS], and a prepared response for each item in [ANTICIPATED_PUSHBACK]. </task> <constraints> - Every design decision must be tied to a stated business goal, not aesthetic preference alone - Prepared responses to pushback must acknowledge the concern before countering it, not dismiss it - Keep each slide-equivalent section to 3 to 4 talking points maximum </constraints> <format> A slide-by-slide outline (Slide Title, Talking Points, Supporting Rationale), followed by an Anticipated Questions & Responses section </format>

Builds a slide-by-slide talking-points outline that ties every design decision back to a business goal, plus prepared answers to expected pushback.

๐Ÿ’ก

Pro tip: Fill in ANTICIPATED_PUSHBACK honestly, including the objection you're actually dreading. Claude drafts a stronger response when the concern is specific.

Client CMS Editing Guide

30/30

You are a senior web designer writing end-user documentation. <context> A client will be maintaining their own site content after launch and needs a plain-language guide to editing it safely in their CMS. </context> <inputs> - Site name: [SITE_NAME] - CMS platform, WordPress, Webflow, Framer, etc.: [CMS_PLATFORM] - Editable sections/content types the client will manage: [EDITABLE_SECTIONS] - Things the client should never touch, code embeds, global settings, etc.: [DO_NOT_TOUCH] </inputs> <task> Write a plain-language guide covering how to edit each item in [EDITABLE_SECTIONS] step by step, how to add a new page or post if applicable, and a clearly marked warning section for everything in [DO_NOT_TOUCH]. </task> <constraints> - Write for a non-technical reader, no jargon without a one-line definition - Steps must be numbered and specific to [CMS_PLATFORM]'s actual interface, real menu names and button labels - The do-not-touch section must explain the consequence of touching it, not just say "don't" </constraints> <format> A structured guide: Getting Started (login/dashboard orientation), one subsection per item in [EDITABLE_SECTIONS] with numbered steps, and a highlighted Do Not Touch warning box </format>

Writes a plain-language, step-by-step CMS editing guide the client can follow to update their own site safely after launch.

๐Ÿ’ก

Pro tip: Name the exact CMS platform and version quirks you know about. Generic "CMS" guides get vague; naming WordPress or Webflow specifically gets real menu names.

Frequently Asked Questions

Copy a prompt, replace the bracketed inputs like [CLIENT_NAME] or [BUSINESS_NAME] with your project's real details, and paste it into Claude. Most prompts return a document, table, or live HTML artifact you can use right away.
Yes, every prompt on this page is free to copy and reuse as often as you like. You'll need your own Claude account, and the free plan is enough for most of these.
It's a webpage Claude builds and renders instantly in the chat, like a hero section or a wireframe, so you can preview it visually without writing code. You can still ask Claude to adjust colors, copy, or layout afterward.
Yes. Treat them as a starting structure: add or remove constraints, rename the inputs, or combine two prompts, like a wireframe plus a style tile, into a single request.
No. These prompts handle the thinking and drafting work, sitemaps, briefs, wireframe logic, and quick HTML previews, that happens before or around your design tool. Final pixel-accurate visual design still belongs in Figma or your editor of choice.

Prompts are the starting line. Tutorials are the finish.

A growing library of 300+ hands-on tutorials on ChatGPT, Claude, Midjourney, and 50+ AI tools. New tutorials added every week.

7-day free trial. Cancel anytime.