Is Lindy worth it in 2026?
Plan prices, the credit cost of one job, and how Lindy compares with Zapier, Make and n8n, with prices checked in October 2026.
The quick answer
Lindy is worth testing for a small team that repeats requests across Gmail, Slack and a CRM, and not for fixed two-app automations. The free tier gives $50 in credits that last seven days with no card. The Team plan starts at $49.99 a month per active user with 5,000 credits, billed monthly only. Every job is measured in credits, so model one month of real use before you commit. Zapier and Make are cheaper at entry for fixed flows. Prices checked on Lindy's pricing page in October 2026.
Paying for Lindy? Get 10x more out of it.
Step-by-step tutorials for Lindy, Claude, Midjourney and many other tools, plus member deals on software. 7-day free trial on the annual plan.
Lindy is worth testing for a small operations or support team that wants an AI agent to act on messy requests across Gmail, Slack and HubSpot, and that can live with a credit meter. The Team plan starts at $49.99 a month per active user, and the free tier gives $50 in credits. Everything is billed in credits rather than tasks, so the real price depends on what you ask Lindy to do.
We checked Lindy's pricing page and its FAQ in October 2026. The plan table alone does not answer the question buyers ask: what does this cost once the team uses it every day? Below are the plans, what one job costs in credits, how Lindy compares with Zapier, Make and n8n, and who should pay.
Lindy against the workflow tools buyers compare it with
Prices from each vendor pricing page, checked October 2026. Zapier and Make in US dollars, n8n in euros as published. Units differ (Lindy credits, Zapier tasks, Make credits, n8n executions), so compare entry prices, not unit counts.
| Feature | Lindy | Zapier | Make | n8n |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Free plan | $50 in credits, lasts 7 days, no card | 100 tasks a month, 1 user | 1,000 credits a month | Self-hosted Community, no price listed |
| Entry paid plan | $49.99 a month per active user, base Team tier (5,000 credits) | Pro from $19.99 a month billed annually (750 tasks) | Core from $9 a month (10,000 credits) | Starter €20 a month billed annually (2,500 executions) |
| Team plan | Top Team tier: 1,750,000 credits at $9,999.50 a month | Team from $69 a month billed annually (2,000 tasks, 25 users) | Teams from $29 a month (10,000 credits) | Business €667 a month billed annually, self-hosted only |
| Billing options | Monthly only, no annual option shown | Annual is 33% below monthly on Pro ($29.99 monthly) | Annual option the page says saves 15% or more | Cloud Starter and Pro billed annually |
| Best fit | An agent that reads a request and acts across apps | Fixed trigger-and-action flows with a known task count | Visual scenarios on a tight budget | Technical teams that want self-hosting or code |
What you get
- ✓Free credits with no card, so you can test a real workflow before paying anything.
- ✓Credits scale with job size: an everyday ask uses 2 to 250 credits, not a flat seat price for every request.
- ✓Pauses credit-using actions when credits run out instead of billing overage, which protects the invoice.
- ✓Broad app coverage: Gmail, Slack, Notion and HubSpot, plus 1,500+ more listed.
- ✓Top-ups you can buy as needed, with monthly billing and no annual commitment to start.
The trade-offs
- ✕Billed per active user at the base tier, so every active member of the team adds to the monthly bill.
- ✕Monthly billing only, and the page shows no annual discount to lower that figure.
- ✕Credits are pooled across the team while billing is per active user, and the page does not spell out how those combine.
- ✕Monthly credits do not roll over, so an unused month is money lost.
- ✕The proof is mostly Lindy's own: the G2 rating has no review count, and the skills and integration numbers are vendor claims.
Worth it if…
- →A small operations, support or sales team that repeats the same multi-app request every week.
- →You want an agent that reads a request and decides what to do, not a fixed trigger-and-action flow.
- →Your work already lives in Gmail, Slack, HubSpot or Notion, which Lindy names as integrations.
- →You can measure credit use during the free week and forecast a monthly pool before you roll it out.
Skip it if…
- →Your automations are fixed two-app flows. Zapier or Make are cheaper at entry and easier to predict.
- →You need self-hosting or code-level control. n8n fits that better.
- →You cannot forecast credit use and do not want a pool that can pause mid-month.
- →You need occasional help only, where the free credits are the most you should spend.
What Lindy costs, plan by plan
Lindy has three plans. The free tier is a trial. Enterprise is quoted on request. The Team plan is the only paid plan with published prices, running from 5,000 credits up to 1,750,000 credits at $9,999.50 a month at the top tier. Those are the figures to budget from.
The number that matters for a team is the one the FAQ spells out: every active user in the workspace is billed at the base tier's monthly price. That makes five active users $249.95 a month, or $2,999.40 over twelve months if they stay on the base tier (our arithmetic). The same page says the credits are pooled across the team. Read both before you buy. The first sets your bill, the second sets how much work that bill buys, and the page does not explain how the two combine. Confirm it in the billing screen during the trial, before you roll it out.
Top-ups cost $10 per 1,000 credits, which is one cent a credit and matches the base tier's price per credit. Monthly credits do not roll over. Removing a seat or cancelling takes effect at the end of the paid cycle, with no mid-cycle proration.
What one job costs in credits
Lindy sorts work into three bands. Everyday asks use 2 to 250 credits, deep work uses 250 to 1,000, and big builds use 1,000 to 2,500. At the $10-per-1,000 top-up price, an everyday ask costs about 2 cents to $2.50, deep work costs $2.50 to $10, and a big build costs $10 to $25 (our arithmetic from the published bands and top-up price).
The useful thing to understand is how Lindy fails. When credits run out, it pauses the credit-using actions rather than billing overage, so the risk is a stalled workflow, not a surprise invoice. The cost of a stall is the work it blocks, which is usually worth far more than the credits Lindy saved. Lindy says bigger jobs use more credits, so a request that touches several apps is more likely to land in a deeper band than a one-line question. Budget a monthly pool, watch it the way you watch a cloud bill, and expect the first month to run hotter while you learn which requests cost the most.
What Lindy does, and what it says about itself
Lindy calls itself an AI teammate that plugs into your tools and takes routine work off your plate. The jobs it shows are concrete: tracking competitors, triaging a support queue, building a meeting deck, logging invoices, and month-end follow-ups. The integrations it names include Gmail, Slack, Notion and HubSpot, plus 1,500+ more. That breadth is the real case for it. If your team's requests span three or four of those apps, a single agent beats stitching together a separate flow for each one.
Three of the homepage claims are Lindy's own, and we have not verified them independently: "40+ skills" (the page shows 42 active), a G2 rating of 4.9, and the integration count. The rating appears with no review count, so treat it as a headline, not a sample. That is the honest gap in Lindy's proof: the pages show no user numbers and no third-party sample size, so the trial is the evidence that counts.
Lindy against Zapier, Make and n8n
Lindy fits one kind of job better than the others: a request that needs reading, judgement and several apps in sequence. Zapier and Make are better for fixed flows where the trigger and steps never change, because you can predict the task count and cost before you build. n8n wins if you want the workflow on your own server or need to write code, and its cloud prices are published in euros only.
The price comparison is not like for like. Lindy charges per credit, scaled to job size. Zapier counts tasks, Make counts module actions as credits, and n8n counts executions. For a fixed two-app flow, the cheapest paid entries are Make's Core plan at $9 a month for 10,000 credits and Zapier Pro at $19.99 a month billed annually for 750 tasks. Lindy's entry price buys a different job. Pay it when that job is the one you have, not because it is the newest tool on the list.
How to test Lindy before you pay
Use the free tier on one real workflow, not a demo. Pick a request your team repeats every week, such as a support triage or a deal update, and run it through Lindy while the free credits last. Write down the credits each run uses, then multiply by how often the team runs it. If the monthly total fits inside the base tier with room to spare, the plan is worth a team trial. If it does not, Lindy's per-job cost is the reason to pick Zapier or Make instead.
The Academy covers the hands-on side. Our tutorial Monitor Competitor Pricing with Lindy AI walks through a weekly competitor-pricing agent, which makes a sensible first workflow to test on the free credits.
The verdict
For a small team with repeated requests across Gmail, Slack and a CRM, Lindy is worth testing. The free tier shows whether an agent that acts on requests fits your work, and the per-active-user Team price is the number to model before a rollout. It is not worth paying for if your automations are fixed two-app flows, because Zapier and Make cover those for less at entry. It is also the wrong tool if you need self-hosting or code-level control, where n8n fits better.
The caveat most buyers miss is the credit meter. Lindy pauses credit-using actions when the pool runs out instead of billing overage, which protects your invoice but can stall a workflow. Model one month of real credit use before you commit, and treat the first month as the test it is.
Better alternatives?
If it is not the right fit, these are worth a look.
Zapier
Pro from $19.99 a month billed annually for 750 tasks, with a free plan of 100 tasks. Built for fixed trigger-and-action flows.
Make
Core from $9 a month for 10,000 credits at its headline price. A visual scenario builder for steady automations on a tight budget.
n8n
Cloud Starter from €20 a month billed annually, with a self-hosted option. The pick for technical teams that want control over code and hosting.
Frequently asked questions
Is Lindy worth it in 2026?▾
For a small team that repeats multi-app requests every week, it is worth testing, and worth paying for once its credit use fits the budget. The Team plan is billed per active user from a base monthly price. For fixed two-app automations, Zapier and Make are cheaper at entry, so the free credits are the cheapest way to decide.
How much does Lindy cost?▾
Lindy has a free tier with credits and no card needed. The Team plan starts at $49.99 a month per active user with 5,000 credits, and credit tiers go up to 1,750,000 credits at $9,999.50 a month. Top-ups cost $10 per 1,000 credits, and Enterprise is priced on request. Prices were checked on Lindy's pricing page in October 2026.
Is there a free Lindy plan?▾
Yes. Lindy gives $50 in free credits with no credit card. The credits last seven days, after which you need a paid plan to keep using Lindy. Treat the free tier as a trial for one workflow, not a permanent plan.
Does Lindy have an annual plan?▾
Not on the pricing page we checked in October 2026. Lindy bills monthly, so five active users on the base tier pay $249.95 a month, or $2,999.40 over twelve months if they stay on it.
What happens when Lindy runs out of credits?▾
Lindy pauses the credit-using actions rather than billing overage. You can top up with more credits or move to a higher monthly tier. Monthly credits do not roll over.
Is Lindy cheaper than Zapier?▾
Not at entry for a fixed flow. Zapier Pro is $19.99 a month billed annually for 750 tasks, or $29.99 monthly, and its free plan covers 100 tasks. Lindy starts at a higher monthly price, but it does a different job: reading a request and acting across apps. Compare them by the job you need done, not by the unit count.