ChatGPT prompts for Reddit titles, comments and AMAs
Copy-ready prompts for titles, posts, comments and AMA prep. No spam, no vote games, no invented personal stories. Paste rules and facts you can stand behind.
In short: This page contains 30 copy-paste ready prompts, organized into 6 categories with a description and pro tip for each. The first 5 prompts are free instantly, no signup needed. Drafted with AI writing assistance and checked against our editorial policy.
Post Titles
5 promptsEight titles from a post body
1/30✨ What it does
Drafts eight titles from a body you already wrote, labelled by type and tied to a sentence in the body. Unsupported lesson titles stay tagged and skipped; no result is invented.
Write 8 title options from a post body I already drafted. Body: [POST BODY]. Subreddit: [SUBREDDIT]. Title style the rules allow, if I pasted them: [RULE NOTES]. Output a numbered list of 8 titles, each 300 characters or fewer, labelled Question, How-to, Lesson, or Update. Every title must be supportable by a sentence in the body. If the body has no lesson, write [VERIFY] on Lesson titles and skip them. Do not invent a personal story. Do not invent a result. A title that promises 'I made a killing' when the body never said so is spam bait.
Pro tip: Paste the full draft, including the boring middle. Titles from the first line only tend to clickbait.
Title versus pasted subreddit rules
2/30✨ What it does
Tables each pasted rule against your title and offers fixes that only use words you already have. Unnamed flair stays tagged; no ban or vote ask is invented.
Check my title against rules I pasted. Title: [TITLE]. Rules: [PASTE RULES]. Output a table with columns Rule line, Title ok yes or no, Why in 15 words, Fix if needed. Fixes may only delete or swap words already in the title or body I add in [BODY SNIPPET]. If a rule is about flair I did not name, write [VERIFY] in Fix. Do not invent a rule. Do not invent a ban. Do not suggest vote manipulation such as asking friends to upvote. A 'mods love this format' claim I did not source is fiction.
Pro tip: Paste the sidebar and the posting guidelines, not a memory of last year's drama.
Question title versus statement title
3/30✨ What it does
Produces one question title and one statement title from the same facts, plus a short note on stories versus resources. Unsupported questions stay tagged; no identity is invented.
Write one question title and one statement title from the same facts. Facts: [FACTS]. Audience I want to hear from: [WHO I WANT]. Output two titles, then a 40 word note on which to use if I want stories versus if I want resources, using only my facts. If facts cannot support a question, write [VERIFY] on the question title. Do not invent a poll result. Do not invent that I am a parent, founder or patient unless those words are in the facts. A fake 'as a nurse' title is an invented personal story.
Pro tip: If you want resources, the statement title plus a clear ask in the body usually ages better.
Title length trim
4/30✨ What it does
Offers three shorter titles that keep a fact you marked as must-keep, with a risk line for cuts that hide it. A fact missing from the original stays tagged and is not slipped in.
Trim this title without losing the fact that makes it true. Title: [TITLE]. Must-keep fact: [MUST KEEP FACT]. Output three shorter titles, each with a character count I can see, plus a one-line risk if a cut hides the must-keep fact. If the must-keep fact is not in the original title, write [VERIFY] and refuse to add it as if it were already there. Do not invent a number. Do not add 'update' or 'you will not believe' unless I wrote those words. A shorter lie is still a lie.
Pro tip: Count characters after you paste. Mobile truncates earlier than you think.
Flair and spoiler labels from my facts
5/30✨ What it does
Chooses flair from a list you copied and spoiler from your call, with a short reason. An empty flair list stays tagged as copy-from-the-sub questions; no tag is invented.
Pick flair and spoiler labelling from facts I have, not from a guess at what mods want. Facts: [FACTS]. Flair list I copied: [FLAIR LIST]. Spoiler or not, my call: [SPOILER CALL]. Output: chosen flair from the list, spoiler yes or no from my call, and a 20 word reason. If the flair list is empty, write [VERIFY] and list questions I should copy from the subreddit before posting. Do not invent a flair. Do not invent an NSFW tag I did not choose. A wrong flair that I guessed is how posts get removed.
Pro tip: Copy the flair menu while you still have the compose window open.
Original Posts
5 promptsHow-to from steps I actually took
6/30✨ What it does
Writes a how-to from steps, tools and failures you actually had, ending with a question for the room. Missing click paths stay tagged; no success metric is invented.
Turn steps I actually took into a how-to post. Steps: [STEPS]. Tools I used: [TOOLS]. What still went wrong: [WHAT WENT WRONG]. Output a post with a one-line title I already chose in [TITLE], numbered steps, a What still went wrong section, and a question for the room. If a step needs a click path I did not write, write [VERIFY] on that step. Do not invent a success metric. Do not invent a screenshot. Do not add a step I skipped. A tutorial that hides the failure is how people get stuck on step 4.
Pro tip: Include the dumb mistake. That is the part strangers can use.
I built this without invented metrics
7/30✨ What it does
Drafts a 150 to 220 word 'I built this' post with a limitation you wrote and a question. Missing limitations stay tagged; no user count or revenue is invented.
Draft an 'I built this' post from facts I can defend. What I built: [WHAT I BUILT]. Who it is for: [WHO IT IS FOR]. Link I am allowed to post per rules I pasted: [LINK OR NONE]. Output a 150 to 220 word post: what it is, who it is for, one limitation I wrote in [LIMITATION], then a question. If I did not give a limitation, write [VERIFY] and ask for one before finishing. Do not invent a user count. Do not invent revenue. Do not write a self-promo blast that ignores [PASTE RULES]. A fake 'thousands of users' line is spam.
Pro tip: Lead with the limitation. People stay when you sound like a person, not a landing page.
Discussion post from my real question
8/30✨ What it does
Shapes a discussion post around your real question, what you tried and shareable context. A blank tried-list stays tagged as a fill-in; no backstory is invented.
Shape a discussion post around a question I actually have. Question: [QUESTION]. What I already tried: [WHAT I TRIED]. Context I can share: [CONTEXT]. Output: title, 120 to 180 word body, and a closing question that matches [QUESTION]. If what I tried is blank, write [VERIFY] and add a 15 word prompt for me to fill before posting. Do not invent a backstory. Do not invent that I already posted this last year. Do not add a product pitch. A discussion seeded with a fake memoir gets spotted.
Pro tip: If you tried nothing yet, say so. Pretend research is obvious.
Resource roundup from links I own
9/30✨ What it does
Turns collected links and your notes into a numbered roundup with a short intro. Links without notes stay tagged and dropped or queried; no review is invented.
Build a resource roundup from links I already collected. Links and why I saved them: [LINKS AND NOTES]. Subreddit: [SUBREDDIT]. Output a post with a short intro in my words from [INTRO ANGLE], then a numbered list: link, 20 word note from my notes, who it helped in my notes if present. If a link has no note, write [VERIFY] and drop it or ask me for a note. Do not invent a review. Do not invent that I used every tool. A roundup of links I never opened is spam.
Pro tip: Only include links you opened this month. Stale bookmarks read as a dump.
Update post from the original plus new facts
10/30✨ What it does
Writes an Update-first recap of your original plus new facts in order. Unexplained contradictions stay tagged; no happy ending is invented.
Write an update on a post I already made. Original post: [ORIGINAL POST]. New facts since then: [NEW FACTS]. Output an update with a first line that says Update, a recap of 40 words using only the original, then new facts in order. If a new fact contradicts the original and I did not explain, write [VERIFY] beside it. Do not invent a happy ending. Do not invent that the community was right. Do not add a personal crisis I did not write. A cinematic update I did not live is still an invented story.
Pro tip: Link the original in the first paragraph if the UI does not do it for you.
Like these prompts? There are full tutorials behind them.
Learn the workflows, not just the prompts. Easy-to-follow tutorials inside AI Academy, and the library keeps growing.
AMA Prep
5 promptsAMA intro from a bio I wrote
16/30✨ What it does
Writes a 120 to 180 word AMA intro from your bio, proof, topics, off limits and hours you will stay. Missing proof stays tagged; no job title is invented.
Write an AMA intro from a bio I wrote, not from a brand page you invent. Bio: [BIO]. Proof I can show: [PROOF I CAN SHOW]. Topics I will answer: [TOPICS]. Topics I will not: [OFF LIMITS]. Output a 120 to 180 word intro: who I am in the bio's words, proof, topics, off limits, how long I will stay from [HOURS I WILL STAY]. If proof is missing, write [VERIFY] and keep the intro but flag it. Do not invent a job title. Do not invent a company. An AMA intro with a fake credential gets the room hunting you.
Pro tip: Match the proof to what mods asked for, such as a badge or a letter, before you go live.
Anticipated questions from my notes
17/30✨ What it does
Lists up to twelve expected questions grouped from your notes, past questions and personal topics you marked okay. Ungrounded questions stay tagged and dropped; no scandal is invented.
List questions I should expect, taken from notes I already have. Notes: [NOTES]. Past questions if any: [PAST QUESTIONS]. Output 12 questions grouped as Work, Limits, How-to, Personal I am willing to answer from [PERSONAL OK]. If a question cannot be sourced from notes or past questions, write [VERIFY] and drop it. Do not invent a scandal question. Do not invent that I was asked this on TV. Preparing for a question nobody has a basis to ask wastes the hour.
Pro tip: Include the rude-but-predictable work question. You will get it.
Short answers bank
18/30✨ What it does
Banks 40 word answers against expected questions, optional links and a do-not-say list. Questions with no supporting fact stay tagged; no statistic or quote is invented.
Bank short AMA answers I can adapt live. Questions I expect: [QUESTIONS]. Facts I will stand on: [FACTS]. Output a table with columns Question, 40 word answer from my facts, Link or none from [LINKS I MAY SHARE], Do not say from [DO NOT SAY]. If a question has no supporting fact, write [VERIFY] in Answer. Do not invent a statistic. Do not invent a customer quote. A canned lie is worse live than a slow honest 'I do not know'.
Pro tip: Practise saying 'I do not know' once so it is available when a question leaves the facts.
Off-limits card for live answers
19/30✨ What it does
Builds a glanceable off-limits card with a 20 word redirect you will actually use. Missing redirects stay tagged as a plain refusal; no later AMA is invented.
Make an off-limits card I can glance at while answering. Off limits: [OFF LIMITS]. Legal or work reasons I wrote: [REASONS]. Output a two-column card: Topic, Redirect sentence of 20 words that stays true to [REDIRECT I WILL USE]. If a topic has no redirect, write [VERIFY] and use 'I am not going to answer that'. Do not invent a gag. Do not invent a legal holding. Do not promise a later AMA I did not schedule. A joke that leaks the off-limits topic still leaks it.
Pro tip: Put the card above the keyboard. Searching a doc mid-AMA looks like stalling, because it is.
AMA closing comment
20/30✨ What it does
Writes a 70 to 110 word closing with hours stayed, threads you still owe and a follow-up place you actually have. Unnamed owed threads stay tagged; no gift or upvote ask is invented.
Write a closing comment I can post when I leave. Hours I stayed: [HOURS I STAYED]. Threads I still owe, if any: [THREADS I OWE]. Where people can follow up that I actually have: [FOLLOW UP PLACE]. Output 70 to 110 words: thanks, hours, owed threads I will return to, follow-up place. If I owe threads but named none, write [VERIFY]. Do not invent a gift. Do not invent that I answered everyone. Do not ask for upvotes on the AMA. A closing that brags about a count I did not tally is fluff.
Pro tip: Post the closer when you actually leave, not two hours after you went to dinner.
Helpful Answers
5 promptsAnswer from pasted docs
21/30✨ What it does
Answers from pasted documents with short quotes and a Gaps line. Unanswered parts stay tagged; no policy or product memoir is invented.
Answer a question using only documents I paste. Question: [QUESTION]. Docs: [PASTE DOCS]. Output: a 120 to 200 word answer with quoted short phrases from the docs, then a Gaps line. If the docs do not answer a part, write [VERIFY] on that part. Do not invent a policy. Do not invent a personal story of using the product. A helpful tone wrapped around a made-up clause is still wrong.
Pro tip: Paste the manual page, not a blog recap of the manual.
Step list for a how-do-I
22/30✨ What it does
Writes numbered clicks from a path you remember, with your software version in the first line. Fuzzy steps stay tagged; no menu from another version is invented.
Write a how-do-I answer as steps I have actually clicked. Question: [QUESTION]. Clicks I remember: [CLICK PATH]. Software version I am on: [VERSION]. Output numbered steps using my click path, with the version in the first line. If a step is fuzzy, write [VERIFY] on it. Do not invent a menu name. Do not invent that I am on a different version. A confident click path from memory of an old UI wastes an hour of someone else's night.
Pro tip: Open the software, click it once, then paste. Memory of menus lies.
This happened to me only from my story
23/30✨ What it does
Writes an 80 to 140 word first-person reply from a story and outcome you supplied, plus a may-not-match line. Neatening details stay tagged and omitted; no second incident is invented.
Write a 'this happened to me' reply using only a story I supply. Story: [MY STORY]. Outcome: [OUTCOME]. Output 80 to 140 words in first person, then a one-line 'this may not match your case'. If a detail would make the story neater but is not in the paste, write [VERIFY] and omit it. Do not invent a second incident. Do not invent a hospital, a court or a boss. If I did not live it, this prompt should refuse the anecdote rather than polish a fiction.
Pro tip: If you would not say it under your real name, do not say it in first person here.
Tool comparison from use I logged
24/30✨ What it does
Tables tools you used against what you used them for, what broke and what you still do not know. Unused tools stay tagged and dropped; no ranking or plan name is invented.
Compare tools I have actually used. Tools: [TOOLS I USED]. What I used each for: [USE NOTES]. Output a table with columns Tool, What I used it for, What broke, What I still do not know. Stay inside the notes. If I did not use a tool, write [VERIFY] and drop that row. Do not invent a ranking. Do not invent a plan name. Do not mention prices. A comparison that includes a tool I only saw in an ad is an invented review.
Pro tip: Include what broke. Perfect tables read as marketing.
Local recs from places I have been
25/30✨ What it does
Lists up to five local recs from places you have been, with one fact and a last-went date if you have it. Unvisited places stay tagged and skipped; no menu is invented.
Recommend local places I have actually been. City: [CITY]. Places and what I did there: [PLACES AND NOTES]. Ask in the thread: [ASK]. Output up to 5 recs, each with a place from my list, one fact from my notes, and a 'last went' if I dated it in [DATES]. If a rec would need a place I did not visit, write [VERIFY] and skip it. Do not invent a menu. Do not invent a hidden gem. A rec of a place I only saw on a map is an invented personal story.
Pro tip: Say when you last went. A 2018 rec should wear that year.
Go from copy-pasting to actually mastering AI.
AI Academy: hands-on tutorials on ChatGPT, Claude, Midjourney, and many other tools. New tutorials are added regularly.
Community Fit Checks
5 promptsSubreddit fit from rules paste
26/30✨ What it does
Judges fit from pasted rules, with a rewrite that only deletes or reorders your sentences. Missing rules stay tagged and stop the job; no vibe or karma farm is invented.
Judge whether my post fits a subreddit using rules I pasted. Post: [POST]. Rules: [PASTE RULES]. Output: Fit yes, no, or rewrite, with quotes from the rules, plus a rewrite that only deletes or reorders my sentences. If a rule is about karma, accounts or votes, quote it and write 'follow the rule, do not game it'. If I pasted no rules, write [VERIFY] and stop. Do not invent a vibe check. Do not suggest building karma with junk posts. Fit is about the rules I pasted, not a growth hack.
Pro tip: If the subreddit has an automod comment, paste that too. It is part of the rules.
Crosspost rewrite for a second sub
27/30✨ What it does
Rewrites your post for a second sub using that sub's rules, keeping facts and dropping rejected in-jokes. Missing rules stay tagged and stop the job; no lurker backstory is invented.
Rewrite a post for a second subreddit I named, using that sub's rules. Original: [ORIGINAL POST]. Second sub: [SECOND SUB]. Rules: [SECOND SUB RULES]. Output a rewrite that keeps my facts, drops in-jokes the second rules would reject, and names the original sub only if [MAY NAME ORIGINAL] is yes. If rules are missing, write [VERIFY] and stop. Do not invent that I am a long-time lurker there. Do not suggest crossposting to farm votes. A second copy with a fake 'just found this community' line is spam.
Pro tip: Read the second sub for a week before you rewrite. Rules miss the local jokes.
Spam and self-promo check
28/30✨ What it does
Tables each line and link for promo risk against pasted rules, with keep, cut or disclose. Missing disclosure stays tagged; no extra links or vote pods are suggested.
Audit this draft for spam and self-promo against rules I pasted. Draft: [DRAFT]. Rules: [PASTE RULES]. Links in the draft: [LINKS]. Output a table with columns Line or link, Promo risk, Rule quote, Keep cut or disclose. If a link is my own site and the rules need disclosure I did not write, write [VERIFY] on disclose. Do not invent extra links. Do not suggest astroturfing. Do not suggest vote pods. Cutting the pitch is the usual fix, not a sneakier pitch.
Pro tip: If the post still works with the link removed, remove it and put the link in a comment if rules allow.
Vote-manipulation refusal
29/30✨ What it does
Removes vote, brigade and off-platform pile-on asks, listing what was cut. Ambiguous lines stay tagged and removed; no wink replacement is added.
Rewrite any part of this draft that asks for votes, brigade or off-platform piles. Draft: [DRAFT]. Output: a cleaned draft with those asks removed, a list of removed lines, and a 40 word note that vote manipulation is off limits. If the draft has no such ask, say so and return it unchanged. If a line is ambiguous, write [VERIFY] and remove it. Do not invent a wink that still asks for votes. Do not add 'like and subscribe' style language. A subtler vote ask is still a vote ask.
Pro tip: Ask for comments or corrections. Attention that has to be requested as votes is the wrong kind.
Remove invented anecdotes pass
30/30✨ What it does
Deletes first-person stories that are not on your lived list, or tags them, then lists the deletions. No replacement composite friend or customer is added.
Strip invented or unearned anecdotes from this draft. Draft: [DRAFT]. Anecdotes I actually lived: [LIVED ANECDOTES]. Output the draft with any first-person story not in the lived list deleted or tagged [VERIFY]. Then list deletions. Do not replace a deleted story with a similar one. Do not keep 'a friend of mine' unless that friend is in the lived list. A composite customer is still an invented personal story.
Pro tip: If a story is half true, cut it or rewrite it as the half you would swear to.
Free tool
Prompt Optimizer
Turn a rough idea into a structured, professional AI prompt.
Frequently Asked Questions
Prompts are the starting line. Tutorials are the finish.
A growing library of hands-on tutorials on ChatGPT, Claude, Midjourney, and many other AI tools. New tutorials are added regularly.
Related guides
Comments and Replies
5 promptsHelpful first comment
11/30✨ What it does
Writes a 60 to 110 word first comment from one fact you know and a source if you have one. A missing source stays tagged and the wording stays humble; no shared-problem memoir is invented.
Draft a first comment that adds one fact I actually know. Post I am commenting on: [POST EXCERPT]. Fact I can add: [FACT I KNOW]. Source I can name: [SOURCE OR NONE]. Output a comment of 60 to 110 words: one sentence of context, the fact, the source if I have one, one question. If the source is NONE, write [VERIFY] beside the fact and keep the wording humble. Do not invent that I had the same problem. Do not invent a credential. A 'when I was in your shoes' I did not live is an invented personal story.
Pro tip: If you only have a question, ask it. Fake expertise ages worse than curiosity.
Disagree without dunking
12/30✨ What it does
Writes a short disagreement that quotes their claim, adds your counter and evidence, and invites a correction. Missing evidence stays tagged as a question; no motive or vote ask is invented.
Write a disagreement that stays on the claim. Their claim: [THEIR CLAIM]. My counter, with evidence I have: [MY COUNTER]. Output a comment: quote their claim in short, my counter, evidence, an invite to correct me. If evidence is missing, write [VERIFY] and turn the comment into a question. Do not invent a study. Do not invent their motive. Do not suggest brigading or downvoting them. A dunk that needs a motive I cannot know is a fight, not a reply.
Pro tip: Quote the smallest clause you dispute. Whole-comment quotes look like a pile-on.
Clarify a confused thread
13/30✨ What it does
Restates the still-open question and lists answers already on screen, tagging gaps instead of filling them. No consensus, wiki or extra-year anecdote is invented.
Clarify a thread using only what is already on screen. Thread: [PASTE THREAD]. The question I think is still open: [OPEN QUESTION]. Output a comment that restates the open question, lists answers already given with usernames as they appear, and flags gaps as [VERIFY] rather than filling them. Do not invent a consensus. Do not invent a wiki. Do not add a story about how you solved this in 2019 unless that year is in the paste. A clarifying comment that sneaks in a new anecdote is still an invented personal story.
Pro tip: If two people used the same word differently, name both uses. That is the clarification.
Thank-you that adds a fact
14/30✨ What it does
Writes a 40 to 70 word thank-you that adds an extra fact, including whether it worked only if you said so. Unknown outcomes stay tagged and omitted; no upvote ask is added.
Write a thank-you that adds one fact so it is not empty karma. What helped: [WHAT HELPED]. Extra fact I can add: [EXTRA FACT]. Output 40 to 70 words: thanks, the extra fact, whether it worked for me only if I wrote [DID IT WORK]. If I did not say whether it worked, write [VERIFY] and skip that clause. Do not invent a before-and-after. Do not ask people to upvote the parent. A thank-you with a fake transformation is an ad.
Pro tip: Name the exact step that helped. 'Thanks, this is gold' teaches nobody.
Source request reply
15/30✨ What it does
Writes a 30 to 50 word source request that restates the claim and offers to update. An unquoted claim stays tagged; no report threat or downvote plan is invented.
Ask for a source without sounding like a cop. Claim I want sourced: [CLAIM]. Tone I want: [TONE]. Output a 30 to 50 word reply: the claim restated, a request for a link or name, a note that I will update my view. If the claim is not in the thread paste I add here [THREAD BIT], write [VERIFY] and ask me to quote it. Do not invent that the claim is false. Do not threaten a report. Do not organise downvotes. A source request that is actually a takedown will get ignored.
Pro tip: Ask for the link they would trust, not for a paper they cannot reach.